What is it then?
Not at all, two gay men and a son would be ok. But why have two dads when you can have a mom and a dad, would that make any sense, of course not. How about a girl and two dads? How about a boy and two moms? What not just go with what's nornal if you can? Who needs two dads or two moms? That make any sense?
Why do some like cats better than dogs? Why do some prefer Bud over Coors? My favorite color is blue....why?
but you can choose to be gay at any time.
So be gay for a spell. Monday Night Raw.
This whole gay thing is always funny. You really get to see just how immature people in hiding really are. How many times have I mentioned the love of my life...Judy. How many times have I talked about what a woman needs/wants? Only immature people play this ridiculouis....you're gay...especially when they know damn well you're not.
Ok see the above, now it's....
You know what they say about those who try and convince people they aren......hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Grow the up people, damn!!!!!!!
Not as much as you have talked about professional wrestling.
It's a pretty glaring tell tbh. Any talk about women is merely compensating.
Interesting read
Even though the gay rights movement theoretically wants proof that sexuality is inborn, this particular hypothesis is, unintentionally, a little insulting. “The scientists behind the [maternal immunization] hypothesis talk about it as if they’re not making judgments, but there are implicit judgments,” says Jack Drescher, former chair of the American Psychiatric Association’s Committee on Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Issues. Drescher points out, correctly, that the hypothesis is fundamentally one of pathology. If Blanchard is right, then (at least some) gay people are indeed born gay, but there’s still something wrong with them. The hypothesis turns sexuality into a birth defect, an aberration: Gay people are deviants from the normative mode of heterosexuality. We may have been born this way, the hypothesis implies, but that’s not how it was supposed to happen.
Drescher is skeptical that scientists will ever uncover a single biological basis for sexuality—he suspects the root causes are more varied and complex—and suggests that it’s the wrong question to ask in the first place. But the hunt will go on. The gay rights movement, like the black civil rights movement before it, begins with the proposition that we should not discriminate against people because of who they are or how they were born. That’s a belief most Americans share, and it explains the success of the “born this way” anthem. If sexuality is truly biological, discrimination against gay people is bigotry, plain and simple. But if it’s a birth defect, as Blanchard’s work tacitly suggests, then being gay is something that can—and presumably should—be fixed.
That’s a toxic view, and one that must be abandoned. We might not yet understand the exact biological mechanisms underlying sexual orientation, but we will one day soon. And if, at that point, sexuality is seen as a disorder, the next step will be a search for a cure. That would be a tragedy—for society and for science. There’s nothing wrong with being gay: You know it; I know it; the Supreme Court knows it. But so long as large swaths of the country believe otherwise—places where phobic families still ostracize their gay sons and brothers—any research into its biological origins is fraught with peril for the cause of gay rights.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I realize it's not blowing my horn.
According to whom? It could just as easily be said it's simply less common but still normal.If Blanchard is right, then (at least some) gay people are indeed born gay, but there’s still something wrong with them. The hypothesis turns sexuality into a birth defect, an aberration: Gay people are deviants from the normative mode of heterosexuality. We may have been born this way, the hypothesis implies, but that’s not how it was supposed to happen.
If you believe in a creator, that creator created sexuality.You just talked about yourself.
Ok all good things must come to an end. While the first 20 pages were interesting we are now just chasing our tails. My legs are growing weary, one from kicking candyasses and the other from being humped on frantically for 22 pages.
This will wrap it up.
Last edited by Avante; 07-21-2013 at 05:48 AM.
now you claim you don't believe in god? This is getting even funnier given how many times you've hated on atheists on this site.
You have 245 out of 661 posts in this thread. No one else who has posted in this thread has even cracked 100. You've been chasing your own tail since this started and thinking otherwise is completely delusional.
Not to mention, he's clearly stated on here that he DOES believe in God, "just not the God of the Bible" (whatever the that means).... lol posting nothing but Jeebo propaganda this entire thread and then pretending to be an atheist
What the .
Let's see...now who is everyone talking to here, oh yeah...me. So what's that tell you, oh yeah I'll probably be responding...huh?
Wow~~~~~~~
If this is your way of wrapping it up, I bet Mason was never surprised at anything on Christmas morning
People should get locked up when they get this stupid.
I've never said I believed in God, never! I said I believe in a superior being, a master designer not a personal God. Something created all this, it did not just happen. The Bible has nothing at all to do with anything, it's just Homer and everyone buying into his stories.
sexuality is not biological, if you think it is you are 100% wrong.
Why don't you tell that to those who still posted here after me wrapping it up? Why not.."hey dummies he's wrapped it up"..well?
No one takes anything you say seriously tbh, why are you surprised?
as previously mentioned (by CD i think), your master designer created sexuality.
God you're stupid
Because you clearly haven't wrapped it up yourself.
You're still going just as strong and stupid as ever.
Apparently they do here we are on page 23. I ignore those I don't take serously just ask johnsmith anfd Chumtydumpty.
Stupid is thinking there is some message there.
You ever deal in facts moron? Do you know any facts? You seem totally limited and in awe of those of us who aren't. But your ignorance bothers you so you have to lash out instead of learn.
The fact is you welshed on your own thread closing.
lol lash out
If I cared enough about you, I might throw you a scientific bone.
But watching you wallow around in arrogant ignorance is more fun.
You won't do anything at all, you can't!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote