Boston Bomber on the cover of Rolling Stone causes HUGE backlash

[redzero]

Yay, more vague accusations of lying.

[Jacob1983]

How do we know that this bubba did this? What if he was some type of patsy like Oswald or Keenan Ivory Wayans in Most Wanted or Mark Wahlberg in Shooter? Or what if he is some type of agent for Russia? We don't know all the facts so can you really convict the guy? Well, some people already have because that's the American way. When something bad happens, we always want someone to blame. How do we know that this guy isn't just being used as a patsy? Like what if the cops and feds saw this guy at the marathon and just decided that it would be a good story for him to be the bomber?

[ChumpDumper]

How do we know that this bubba did this? What if he was some type of patsy like Oswald or Keenan Ivory Wayans in Most Wanted or Mark Wahlberg in Shooter? Or what if he is some type of agent for Russia? We don't know all the facts so can you really convict the guy? Well, some people already have because that's the American way. When something bad happens, we always want someone to blame. How do we know that this guy isn't just being used as a patsy? Like what if the cops and feds saw this guy at the marathon and just decided that it would be a good story for him to be the bomber?

I would say the video of he and his brother throwing bombs at the police probably convinced me.

And all the eyewitnesses.

But you wouldn't know anything about that.

[redzero]

How do we know that this bubba did this?

Already answered.

What if he was some type of patsy like Oswald or Keenan Ivory Wayans in Most Wanted or Mark Wahlberg in Shooter? Or what if he is some type of agent for Russia?

There is no evidence to suggest that he was set up, so one should not believe that he was set up. It's quite simple.

We don't know all the facts so can you really convict the guy?

How can anybody be convicted if we go by your ridiculous standards?

Well, some people already have because that's the American way.

Nah, it's because he did it.

When something bad happens, we always want someone to blame.

And in this case, you want to blame the government based on zero evidence, while at the same time ing about those who disagree with you and actually have evidence for their position.

How do we know that this guy isn't just being used as a patsy?

Burden of proof. You believe that he was a patsy, so prove it.

Like what if the cops and feds saw this guy at the marathon and just decided that it would be a good story for him to be the bomber?

Wow, what a coincidence! The brothers just so happened to be at the place where the bomb went off. People just so happened to claim to have witnessed them placing the bomb. Tamerlan just so happened to have connections to radical Islam. Yep, your position seems more reasonable.

[CuckingFunt]

I like how conspiracy nuts following other conspiracy nuts think they're not sheep.

[monosylab1k]

How do we know that this bubba did this? What if he was some type of patsy like Oswald or Keenan Ivory Wayans in Most Wanted or Mark Wahlberg in Shooter? Or what if he is some type of agent for Russia? We don't know all the facts so can you really convict the guy? Well, some people already have because that's the American way. When something bad happens, we always want someone to blame. How do we know that this guy isn't just being used as a patsy? Like what if the cops and feds saw this guy at the marathon and just decided that it would be a good story for him to be the bomber?

That would be some Holocaust level racism against whites tbh

[Jacob1983]

I stand by what I said. I have my opinion. You have yours. Obviously, you don't like my opinion so you're gonna do everything you can to make me feel stupid about my opinion. With that being said, I'm sticking with my opinion. Until there is more evidence, I will say that this guy is suspected of being the Boston bomber instead of being the judge, jury, and executioner.

[mouse]

Actually, they gulped down the first conspiracy posted on the internets.

precisely my point. A conspiracy takes time to develop so it took a little thought process (something you avoid) which means the person took the time at seeking other reasons an event took place.

So in your own words you despise people who think first and investigate the total opposite of a Sheeple.

I really thank you for finally proving my point my views about you.

[ChumpDumper]

I stand by what I said. I have my opinion. You have yours. Obviously, you don't like my opinion so you're gonna do everything you can to make me feel stupid about my opinion. With that being said, I'm sticking with my opinion. Until there is more evidence, I will say that this guy is suspected of being the Boston bomber instead of being the judge, jury, and executioner.

You don't even know what evidence is out there.

precisely my point. A conspiracy takes time to develop so it took a little thought process (something you avoid) which means the person took the time at seeking other reasons an event took place.

So in your own words you despise people who think first and investigate the total opposite of a Sheeple.

I really thank you for finally proving my point my views about you.

Sorry, your conspiracy began before the brothers were identified.

Thank you for proving me right again.

[mouse]

I like how conspiracy nuts following other conspiracy nuts think they're not sheep.

Not BA-aaaaaaaa..aaadddd


In a way that is true, no matter which Shepard you support your part of a flock.

The huge difference is our flock investigates ask questions when your flock just reports to work each week pay taxes and turns on CNN for your daily life updates when you are done watching cable TV and checking your FB page.

[ChumpDumper]

Actually, your sheeple answer questions that have already been answered and pretend they haven't.

That's how stupid people like you are -- you believe anything they say without questioning them yourself.

You worship idiots.

[mouse]

You don't even know what evidence is out there.

Sorry, your conspiracy began before the brothers were identified.

don't be sorry just correct your mistakes and move on.

Thank you for proving me right again.

Your welcome.

BTW which ChumpDumper is in the government cubicle tonight?

[ChumpDumper]

don't be sorry just correct your mistakes and move on.



Your welcome.

BTW which ChumpDumper is in the government cubicle tonight?

Which government agency do you think I work for?

This is where mouse s himself and tried to change the subject.

[mouse]

Actually, your sheeple answer questions that have already been answered and pretend they haven't.

Has it ever occurred to you maybe we don't like the answers we are given at first? That is the very definition of a clone your just imitate life where I explore it.

That's how stupid people like you are -- you believe anything they say without questioning them yourself.

Who said i was done investigating how do you know what I "believe" in? a racist and not be aware of it.

You see that's your problem you just assume everything is black and white you have no gray,tan,or brown in your mindset and I take it you may be a closet and not know it.

You worship idiots.

what is the alternative?

[ChumpDumper]

Has it ever occurred to you maybe we don't like the answers we are given at first? That is the very definition of a clone your just imitate life where I explore it.

I just said you adopted the first conspiracy theory you were fed.

Who said i was done investigating how do you know what I "believe" in? a racist and not be aware of it.

I say you have never done any investigating about anything in your life. You have posted YouTubes and that's it.

what is the alternative?

Not worshiping idiots.

[lefty]

Mouse and SA210 with the Tsarnaev Truth Bombs !!!!!!!

[mouse]

Which government agency do you think I work for?

The one with a meth lab and no girls.

Your up at all hours of the day and you have time to post , so i figured 2 + 2 equals... ( Psssst! I did the math)

This is where mouse s himself and tried to change the subject.

What do you know about subject

You never stay on it.


Look Chump your cyber ass deserves a break now and then so I give you a lifeline or a backdoor to leave the subject with a percentage of your reputation intact I am not a total asshole I take no pride waxing your ass in every debate your brave enough to follow me in but I owe it to the readers to live up to basic standards of this site so I lower the bar just enough to keep you replying but that all will end tonight if you have nothing more to add to a topic instead of your lame ass re fried outdated smack.



just for you.

[ChumpDumper]

The one with a meth lab and no girls.

Your up at all hours of the day and you have time to post , so i figured 2 + 2 equals... ( Psssst! I did the math)

But you didn't mention a government agency.

What do you know about subject

You never stay on it.

You're the one who wants to make it about me.

Look Chump your cyber ass deserves a break now and then so I give you a lifeline or a backdoor to leave the subject with a percentage of your reputation intact I am not a total asshole I take no pride waxing your ass in every debate your brave enough to follow me in but I owe it to the readers to live up to basic standards of this site so I lower the bar just enough to keep you replying but that all will end tonight if you have nothing more to add to a topic instead of your lame ass re fried outdated smack.

Hey more stuff about me and not the topic.

[mouse]

But you didn't mention a government agency.

The post office is a government agency, I'm not going to list everyone. the point is your an employee it's nothing new to the posters.

You're the one who wants to make it about me.

Trying to point out your mental capabilities and it's hard to do w/o getting a little personal.

Hey more stuff about me and not the topic.

You are the one using the cubicle tonight.

[ChumpDumper]

The post office is a government agency, I'm not going to list everyone. the point is your an employee it's nothing new to the posters.

You only have to post one. You are failing.

Trying to point out your mental capabilities and it's hard to do w/o getting a little personal.

On the contrary, you could just post what you believe actually happened at the Boston bombings.

Why can't you just do that?

You are the one using the cubicle tonight.

You are the one desperately trying to make it about me and not the topic.

Post what you think really happened at the Boston bombings without whining about me.

[mouse]

I am overhauling a 9300 Dell laptop , and as you would know if you know about Dell's the real work is locating the drivers activation.

so please don't mistake my late comebacks as a weakness I'm sometimes occupied.

[mouse]

Mouse and SA210 with the Tsarnaev Truth Bombs !!!!!!!

That just leaves the Bull lie Bombs!!!!

[mouse]

I will just wait till "your" shift ends... and wait to talk to pDumper #3 when he replaces you at 0800 hours. At least that Chump knows enough to add to the subject matter.


Your truing to win a heckling contest and your losing it.

but keep responding at least we can leave a paper www paper trail others can Google later on how to get cyber ass waxed debating a subject you haven't at least done the slightest research on.

[mouse]

[redzero]

I stand by what I said. I have my opinion. You have yours. Obviously, you don't like my opinion so you're gonna do everything you can to make me feel stupid about my opinion. With that being said, I'm sticking with my opinion. Until there is more evidence, I will say that this guy is suspected of being the Boston bomber instead of being the judge, jury, and executioner.

Your opinion is stupid and not based on anything. Again, there is more than enough evidence to convince a reasonable person that Dzhokhar perpetrated the Boston Marathon Bombings. You haven't given a single explanation for why you believe that he was set up. Not one.

None of you conspiracy theorists will even bother saying what YOU think happened that day. You're lazy cowards who pat yourselves on the back for not accepting the official story, while providing no story of your own.