They're gonna either start him at the 2 or Nate tbh.
...Andre Miller anyone?
They're gonna either start him at the 2 or Nate tbh.
If George Karl were still coach we'd see a Nate/Lawson/Miller/Foye/Hickson lineup, tbh...
That's worse than Danny Green at PF![]()
Nuggets said that they don't need Miller. I'd take him. Sucks that they don't need guards...
yea. He is better than nearly 80 percent of our guards tbh.
WAY too ball dominant, and can't shoot. He'd be a horrible fit here.
Oh, and he's also worse on defense than Neal at this point in his career.
Do. Not. Want.
Ball dominant yes. Worse than neal on D NO. Can he competently run the backup pg slot Yes. I can agree that he wont be the best fit here but he would be welcomed over our glut of marginal guards, but not likely to happen anyway.
Goddamn how many teams has this dude been on
We've already got 7 guards, 8 if you count Neal. Why would you want another one?
Would be good to get Wilson Chandler for the backup SF.. Doubt it with he's contract
cause he can pass the ball.
If he'd be willing to take on the role of Tony's backup / garbage time floor general I'd be all for it. I'm not sure he's willing to accept that role though.
The Spurs could definitely use a guy like him though. Someone on this team other than Tony and Good-Manu needs to be able to run an offense.
Wasn't he the backup in Denver though?
Miller's looking to start. Not likely that the Spurs are going to go after him.
He was, but Denver also played him at SG alongside Lawson to get him more minutes. Those SG minutes wouldn't be there for him in San Antonio because of Green/Manu/Belinelli.
Last time we won we had a backup PG that couldn't shoot but was a solid floor general (Jacque Vaughn). Miller's an even better passer.
5...cavs, 76ers, blazers, clippers, nuggets (twice)
but it feels like 29
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)