Reply With Quote
yes he is and someone should contact the proper authorities for having kiddie porn on his computer
Rogue, why the are you showing us an upskirt panty shot a kid in your sig? Get that crap out of here...
yes he is and someone should contact the proper authorities for having kiddie porn on his computer
...a human being will look "there" because we're only human, obviously. Thereafter, one must confront one's heart. Is it one of light, or, one of darkness? Me? I just want to pat her on the head and get in the buffet line before all the good stuff is picked over.
That little girl is so cute the pic is like one of my top3 most favorite Scarlett pictures tbh (along with the ones from bobby long press conference and the 12' democratic national convention), I really feel sad that some people only saw the white panties while totally ignoring the angel's cute face. Beauty or ugliness only depends on the beholder's eyes, everything looks evil in an evil's eyes imho.
s don't believe in pedophilia
What you don't see behind the scenes
^At least she has a bra on.
wtf is wrong with youWhat you don't see behind the scenes
Who's rogue?
The picture is quite innocent, one would need to actively be looking between the girl's legs to notice a very minor exposure of children's undergarments.
I guess that those who think I'm a pedophile just because the little angel in my sig shows a tip of her panties must be avid "fans" of Ballet in the real life. They attend theaters to watch Ballet despite the price being high and their income being low, but they don't go there just to watch "Ballet"... More often than not, those persons are also big "fans" of volleyball and figure skating.
What you don't see behind the scenes
Sad to say but I was thinking the same thing tbh. Weird to have an upskirt pic of a little girl on your sig. I don't care if it's goddess hot Scarlett as a toddler or what. Still wrong. Please remove brah. It's weirding me out and could get u in trouble tbh. The bads abound on dis one.
I think that some posters (like BR, djohn etc...) use sigs that are really obscene and salacious, and I never heard they ever fell in any sort of trouble because of their sigs tbh. I'm sorry if anyone of you feel uncomfortable with my sig but imho, the evil only exists in the beholder's eyes imho.
If the white soft pair of panties is the only thing you can see on a girl's body, you probably have been living your entire life in the narrow crevice between her fat butt cheeks, besides which the only part of the girl's body you've ever touched is the fingertips of either her left hand or the right one, but no direct contact... you can only feel them fingertips at the other side of several layers of toilet paper which looks just as white as her panties.
Last edited by Rogue; 07-29-2013 at 03:16 AM.
lol chinese ot
nsa be lurking this mfker
I don't see anything wrong with the pic. The first thing I noticed is how cute Scarlett was when she was a kid. Too bad, she devolved when she grew up.
TBH the scarlett from age 10 to 15 looked rather gross, skin on her forhead was rough like the surface of the moon and her teeth looked pretty ed-up which was easily seen when she smirked. But things began to turn around quickly in her favor when she started smoking at age 15, and the girl named "Charlotte" was simply gorgeous in "lost in translation". During the two years from age 15 to 17 it seemed like she was living in a cocoon refining herself, and the metamorphosis was completed just in time for her to impress the world with her brilliant performances in both films of "Lost in Translation" and "Girl with a pearl earring", both of which earned her golden globe nominations
she's kinda cute thoWhat you don't see behind the scenes
everyone who has seen the pic has looked up the girls skirt whether you're a Pedo or not. When I look a pic I look at the totality of it. When I first saw the pic I looked to see if baby beaver was showing. Since it wasn't I dismissed the Rogue Pedo idea. I think what does Rogue in is his constant dribble about how much he hates women and pussy but yet loves Scarlott, this view of his makes him seem like a freak. I've seen enough court cases of weirdo's and coupled with his hate for women the pic seems like an attempt to see if he can skirt the lines of Pedoism in a very subtle manner without getting caught. Not that he is but I can see this theory being submitted as potential evidence
kool n pedo shood be in jail
please...here we go again with the Spur fan self righteousness..didn't not the whole fiasco of :"Tim Duncan is a squeaky clean guy" not teach you guys anything?
Just because you looked up the kids skirt in the pic doesn't make a you pedo it makes you observant. You're a got dam liar if you say you haven't looked up the skirt in that pic to see if her baby beaver was showing. Not that you desire it but you still looked to see if you could see it. I know I did..it was one of the first things I did tbh. I was hoping I didn't see it and I didn't
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
