Reply With Quote
I'm not salty about anything. I just continue to marvel at your inep ude.
You're so salty about your failure you won't even talk about the subject anymore. The difference was posted. You didn't read it and now you're mad at me for reading what you should have read before hitting post thread.So you don't know what you're talking about. Got it.
Stick to posting pasty selfies for mail order brides.
I'm not salty about anything. I just continue to marvel at your inep ude.
You're the one who got owned by boutons of all people.
Riiiiiiiiiight. What I said is true. It hasn't been refuted. But keep living in your own fantasy world if you wish.
boutons exposed you in one sentence.
Weak!
I just exposed you in one word.
Don't be mad. Just have your together next time you try to say something in this forum.
Who's mad? I've got facts. You're the one with .
Wait, what fact do you have again?
The fact he pretends effective rates don't exist.
Really? Where did I reference effective rates?
And since you're such a tool here's some more information for you...
http://taxfoundation.org/blog/anothe...ax-rates-world
Another Study Confirms: U.S. Has One of the Highest Effective Corporate Tax Rates in the World
Most people know by now that the United States has the highest corporate tax rate in the world. At 39.1 percent, it sits 14 percentage points higher than the OECD average.
However, many will point to all the “loopholes” that narrow the corporate tax base and say: “sure, we have the highest statutory rate, but no company pays that!” The implication is of course that U.S. corporations don’t pay a high tax rate compared internationally.
Contrary to this claim, studies show that not only does the United States have the highest statutory rate, but one of the highest effective tax rates. Our 2011 study on effective corporate tax rates shows this. It reviews a number of recent studies and concludes that the average effective rate is around 27 percent, while the average around the world is 20 percent
And by the way I hate having to reference stuff for tools like you...
You people should already know this !
Why wouldn't you? That's the only rate that matters. Only an intellectually dishonest jackass, or an idiot, would focus on nominal rates. Especially when you can use effective rates and still make your point.
As scott succinctly put it, that's precisely the point.
As usual boutons turns every topic into a repub/liberal name calling debate. Hes more worried about pushing blame every time than the actual topic.
Those benefitting from social programs the most will be hurt the most. The risk of trying to make big bucks seem not worth it when the tax dollars get bigger.
lol a subsidy receiving farmer complaining about how the gubbamint treats him
I paid many many times more in than what I've received.
Irregardless I won't be rioting and looting like most of the cities will be if the the dollar collapses along with it budget cuts.
lol admitting you received gubbamint subsidies
keep sucking det teet
Everyone does in. One form or another. Subsidized cars and gas. Subsidized water for towns built in the desert.
Your lieing if you deny it.
And what were your thoughts on the recent farm bill that passed the house?
you guys really took my thread off topic smh
No denying that but farmers are some of the biggest takers in America
Billions in annual subsidies in exchange for a bunch of ty GMO-filled crops
my biggest regret on a daily basis is having to eat that crap because i don't truly have any alternative. the assholes making that stuff ought to serve prison time tbh s banned in most european countries.Billions in annual subsidies in exchange for a bunch of ty GMO-filled crops
Only alternative is spending a lot more money and taking a lot more time shopping for groceries to ensure you're buying organic which I basically do every Sunday. The GMO stuff was my final straw once I read up on it tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions