you're stupid. Guns sales have gone up, while the number of gun owners have gone down...medical technology is keeping more gunshot victims alive that previously would have died. These are factors that need to be accounted for when looking at the effects of guns on society.
Storming in here after sandy hook screaming Obama is gonna take my guns is highly emotional.
Demanding other posters have a moral obligation to go against protocol and help a kid while he's being beaten is emotional.
You're decision making process is highly emotional. It's fine. Just own it.
No, you're stupid. Medical technology has not made gun crime go down.
I didn't say that It did, but it has reduced the number of homicides.
Sure, never said it wasn't.
I never demanded anything and that is pretty ridiculous thing to even say considering we are posting on a message board. I simply called those who wouldn't step in, such as yourself, cowards. I'll own that.Demanding other posters have a moral obligation to go against protocol and help a kid while he's being beaten is emotional.
Glad we agree, emo.
Incorrect. You specifically said Blake (I believe) had a moral obligation...I'm not taking the time to find the post.
You're an emotional man and you rely heavily on emotion in your decision making process. I don't know why that bothers you so much.
Here was my original statement.
We agree that medical technology has lead to less deaths by guns.
We agree that gun sales have gone up.
We agree that gun crime has gone down.
So are you saying that more guns have not lead to more gun crime?
Incorrect. I said Blake and I obviously had a different set of morals.
we also agree the rate of gun ownership has gone down. I've already said that if you want to look at the numbers like a chimp and say more guns does not lead to more gun crime, you can. That was never my claim.
Because of the lack of research on the effects of guns, all we have is raw data on homicides and suicides as well as biased data from the NRA or the Brady campaign. I simply want unbiased scientific research into the effects of guns and gun violence so that we can make more informed policy decisions. Why is that so hard to comprehend? Why do you insist on me answering your chimp question? Never mind, I know the answer. You're and emotional wreck.
You think you've got me pegged based on some random posts on a message board?
You ever read Descartes' Error?
Sorry. You said the bus driver had a moral obligation, not Blake. Still emo.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post6796847
I have you pegged. Thats how I sniffed out your highly emotional posting style when you tried to go incognito under KingsFanWithNoName after you emotionally claimed you would no longer post under TSA, just like your hero DMC.You think you've got me pegged based on some random posts on a message board?
You ever read Descartes' Error?
The CDC is researching the effects of guns again and I'm sure they will come to the same conclusion as their last study.
Tried to go incognito........
You do realize all decisions are based on emotion, every single one of them.
i was we'll aware you were "mocking" DMC with your farewell post. That really has nothing to do with your attempt to go incognito with an account you'd been sitting on for 7 years.Tried to go incognito........
Some, like you, rely more heavily on emotion and eschew logic and reason.
He had a moral obligation to intervene...
you're dense, I wasn't trying to be incognito. Plenty of people here already know me by that name. If I wanted to be incognito I would as I always do. I've had plenty of conversations with you under a different handle in a different section of the forum and you've had no clue it was me
.
I'm laughing at you stating you're not going to take the time to find the post and then you take the time to find the post.He had a moral obligation to intervene...
This is an obviously lie as I haven't had any interaction outside of the political forum.I've had plenty of conversations with you under a different handle in a different section of the forum and you've had no clue it was me
Check your pm's dude
I don't have any PMs dude and your weak attempt to find an emotional post from me in favor of gun control was horrid. As CD mentioned, the post was not emo or advocating one position over the other.
I'm not going to take the time to find it. And I mean it when I say it.
I'm out for the day. Thanks for playing this month's episode of more guns=less gun crime! Boutons is still a coward. See ya next month.
I look forward to another emotional outburst from you. They're always amusing.
In order to scoff at a position you are either disingenuous or you hold an opposing viewpoint. Your MJ/Prince analogy is a bad one because there are other forms of music.
If I were a MJ fan and you scoffed at it, I could safely assume you're not a fan of MJ, and not only that, but you are somewhat opposed to MJ. That means you don't hold a neutral position.
Although it's convenient to back into a shadow after supporting or attacking a viewpoint, you cannot honestly claim neutrality by doing so.
The Center for Disease Control should study gun related fatalities?
You mean like "cold dead hands crew"? Wasn't aware one person could be a crew.
You're too much of a mental midget to be of any threat, you're barely entertaining and you're too intellectually cowardly to remain in the ring long enough to make a good showing. off.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote