So he gets credit for joining a war to that killed other humans for the sake of American greed. I wonder how many innocent people he killed while "serving"....could it be Karma
Thanks for not providing any insight into the answers I seek. Who's responsible for the gross coverup of white on black violence?
So he gets credit for joining a war to that killed other humans for the sake of American greed. I wonder how many innocent people he killed while "serving"....could it be Karma
crime for the most part is a local issue that is reported on a local level via the local media outlets. some of those local events get carried by the AP and crack into national media coverage. most of those events don't. Do you need your feelings validated with national news coverage of every crime against a white person by a minority?
Man, you s are obsessed with Trill![]()
Look, the reality is that violent crime in the United States is a downward slope. We can't let these stories whether it's black on white, white on black, whichever skew our perception of that.
Could these have been Obama's Sons as well?
The truth should be reported. You're just as dumb as the OP to choose apathy as the better option.
if obama had a grandfather, he would look like delbert belton.
this. my gramps died quite some time ago but fortunate he didn't have to go out like this or even read about it. pretty ing sad. i'm not even shocked by this , this country is full of savages.
Really sad. An Okinawa vet too--bloodiest pacific battle that USA was involved in. Smh
At least he wasn't killed by a band of cops (thugs in uniform) on the su ion of murder or abduction or whatsoever.
Killing the evil is probably the best way to save the innocent imho. He joined a war to fight the fascists who were slaughtering innocent people, and the sooner the war was ended the more innocent people would be saved. Nonetheless, soldiers just executed the orders of their commander and even if they were sent overseas to kill people that you think are innocent, it wasn't their fault. Like, Manstein might be considered a war criminal because he served for the Nazi, but he was still a nation's hero to Germany. He was also just a soldier who had nothing to do with the Fuhrer's decisions imho
Another Trayvon mercy killin...
Lol I see they teach the same revisionist history in china also. The Germans weren't bad at all, they only wanted a stronger unified Europe to be protected against soviet ambitions and sent peace offerings to Britain 24 times while winning the battle against them. They were looking after White interests and wanted a stronger united europe, NOT world domination loke what is tought in allied textbooks. They didn't even want war and most of the countries they annexed submitted willingly and peacefully like Austria. There were no death camps (they were labor internment camps, it was a war afterall) in Germany that was a myth, although I believe the Croats had them.
yup, Janesovic (sp?) was pretty foul
Black physical crime on whites is higher than white physical crime on blacks in this day.
Apathy?
Where in my post did I suggest/advocate apathy, smart guy?
Proxy you are no stranger to making completely misguided statements. Not long ago, maybe a year back, you were off-base on interpreting a statement I made. It's ridiculous. You come on here with your "smarter than thou" at ude and yet lack basic reading comprehension skills. You're all bark, no bite. Substantively, you are a ing dumb .
and do what? Ride their rascal scooters around the town in protest?
You advocate ignoring the racial variable in the crime. Racism is still very prevalent, so it would be moronic to assume that ignoring it would serve as any kind of solution to the division it creates. Easier for you to understand?
I agree Race is always the biggest thing most talk about, when in reality race aside the kids were a bunch of ing idiots. That is the bottom line.He is dead too, what is the point you ignorant bas ? What else did I expect from you?
If everyone was as ignorant as you the world would be a mess to say the least![]()
You are simply restating what you first posted. So I'll ask you again: point out, exactly, where in my first post I suggested advocating apathy toward the racial variable. You are putting words in my mouth. It's not that I don't understand you, it's that I don't get how you extracted what you extracted from my first post. Easier for you to understand?
All these race threads are more about racial masturbation than shedding light on the racial variable in the crimes, in case you havent noticed. This can be seen from the fact that the people who post about this only post about x race be wronged, when in fact there's racism by both races.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)