Lakers: People run out of town by Kobe

[whitemamba]

sidekick les should count as .5

Duncan 4 Kobe 3.5, Pippen 3.

when i search google it says

kobe 5
duncan 4...

dont slit dem wrists thouugh

[ElNono]

^ Then, we went up 3-1 on Spurfan.

^ Then you went down 0-4. Swept

[spurraider21]

when i search google it says

kobe 5
duncan 4...

dont slit dem wrists thouugh

google search also confirms a sweep

[whitemamba]

google search also confirms a sweep

also confirims

5
4

histroy will remember rings not sweeps. u better than that.

[Arnold Toht]

^ White

[spurraider21]

Boiled down:::

Kobe: 5
Duncan: 4

^ White

wannabe Thread

[Arnold Toht]

^ 4-time NBA Champion

[spurraider21]

also confirims

5
4

histroy will remember rings not sweeps. u better than that.

yeah well, if you wanna go and discuss sidekick rings from over a decade ago, go ahead and have fun with that.

kobe has been the frontman of 2 championship teams, and of those 2 alpha rings, he was only the best player in that series once.

[spurraider21]

^ 4-time NBA Champion

^1-time NBA Champion

[Arnold Toht]

yeah well, if you wanna go and discuss sidekick rings from over a decade ago, go ahead and have fun with that.

kobe has been the frontman of 2 championship teams, and of those 2 alpha rings, he was only the best player in that series once.

Looks like a post, sounds like 5-4, Kobe over Duncan.

[spurraider21]

^1 time NBA champion

[whitemamba]

yeah well, if you wanna go and discuss sidekick rings from over a decade ago, go ahead and have fun with that.

kobe has been the frontman of 2 championship teams, and of those 2 alpha rings, he was only the best player in that series once.

Again, your not seeing the point, everytime you hear a great player througout history, they always talk about their play, their game, their clutch, their ringcount, like when i hear or see MJ vids or stories, i dont hear how much help horace grant gave them, or ron harper, all you hear is MJ and rings.

[Arnold Toht]

^1-time NBA Champion

I'm a 5-time NBA World Champion.


You: 4

[spurraider21]

Again, your not seeing the point, everytime you hear a great player througout history, they always talk about their play, their game, their clutch, their ringcount, like when i hear or see MJ vids or stories, i dont hear how much help horace grant gave them, or ron harper, all you hear is MJ and rings.

i don't think people look at Pippen's 6 rings and think he's better than Bird even though he has 3

[ElNono]

^ Look like a Sweep... 0-4 Spurs over Lakers

[spurraider21]

I'm a 5-time NBA World Champion.


You: 4

^1-time NBA champ.

1 and done

[Arnold Toht]

^1-time NBA champ.

1 and done

[whitemamba]

i don't think people look at Pippen's 6 rings and think he's better than Bird even though he has 3

thats because pippen was clearly in the shadows of MJ, bird was the man on the celtic teams. People can talk all the beta talk about kobe, but you wouldnt hate him so much if he hadnt caused you so much misery, least you could do is respect the mans game. The same way i respect duncans game (thats it) tbh, ive lost what ever respect i had left for him, but he is still up there with the greats as a BASKETBALL player.

[spurraider21]

thats because pippen was clearly in the shadows of MJ, bird was the man on the celtic teams. People can talk all the beta talk about kobe, but you wouldnt hate him so much if he hadnt caused you so much misery, least you could do is respect the mans game. The same way i respect duncans game (thats it) tbh, ive lost what ever respect i had left for him, but he is still up there with the greats as a BASKETBALL player.

exactly. Kobe was clearly in the shadows of Shaq during the Lakers 3-peat dynastyPERIOD

respect for his game has nothing to do with that

[whitemamba]

exactly. Kobe was clearly in the shadows of Shaq during the Lakers 3-peat dynastyPERIOD

respect for his game has nothing to do with that

Kobe was not in the shadow, yes shaq was the more dominant, but lakers dont win 3 straight with just shaq, thats a fact.

[spurraider21]

Kobe was not in the shadow, yes shaq was the more dominant, but lakers dont win 3 straight with just shaq, thats a fact.

the bulls don't win without Pippen. point? every batman needs his robin. doesn't change the fact that robin is a sidekick and thus in the shadows

[whitemamba]

the bulls don't win without Pippen. point? every batman needs his robin. doesn't change the fact that robin is a sidekick and thus in the shadows

to the contrary and im not trolling i swear, i think the bull still win without pippen, everyone on this board worships MJ, like he did all by himself, every spurfan would agree with me that he still wins without pip. REspect to pippen though, he is also one of the greatest players , i dont want to take anything away from him.

[AchillesHeel]

Kobe was not in the shadow, yes shaq was the more dominant, but lakers dont win 3 straight with just shaq, thats a fact.

And neither does MJ, what's your point? Kirby in his first 3 rings didn't have as much of an impact as Duncan had on his first 3, Duncan won more FMVPs, MVPs and led his team to the Finals 5 times in his career and only lost once whereas Kirby has cost his team the le more than once.

all-time Duncan is still ahead of Kirby

Russell has more rings than Kirby and Duncan combined, but you don't see Celtic fans brag about that, do you? You can't cope with the present so you talk about the past, you didn't even win a playoff game this year. We swept your ass.

[LkrFan]

Don't forget 2008: Bruce Lee Bowen was given his walking papers. Any of you Popsuckers disagree?

[AchillesHeel]

We lost to Miami in the Finals but I don't see Heat fans posting and bragging about it all day.