Dude where have you been, the rebels already admitted guilt for the attack. They said it was an accident mishandling weapons from Saudi Arabia that they supposedly didn't know were chemical weapons.
He should have went to Congress immediately after the chemical attacks. Instead he dithers and talks tough, embarrassing himself on the world stage by getting slapped by the Brits, and pushing Russia to go on a state of alert. Dangerous . Going to Congress now is a joke. They're all on recess and won't get around to discussing this for a week or longer. We warned you clowns that this community organizer would make a lousy President.
You have stated that the strike will be either ineffectual, either purposefully or unintentionally.
There really isn't another way to interpret it.
The implication, that BHO was either unwilling, or unable to do more than hit abandoned buildings was pretty clear.
Given your irrational dislike of him, it is logical to assume that the impetus for saying this was more emotional, than based on any information you had or have. This is par for the course in how you have, in the past, formed opinions that you vomit up here from time to time, then run the away from when you get called on your bull .
Kinda like you are doing here.
Random_cuckold you couldn't even keep your muzzled while she ran around supporting polyamory, you have no right to call anyone out.
LOL Krauthammer.
He has said anything and everything bad about any Democrat that you put in front of him. "Democrat bad! Republican good!"
Dude could be replaced with a 'bot.
He isn't wrong because he is a partisan hack of course, but one should be very very skeptical when he says things about Democrats.
People like them let their emotions cloud their analysis, and are not to be trusted about such things.
If you have sucked it up without any degree of skepticism... well, that's on you.
Blah blah blah cuck cuck cuck
LOL personal attacks.
When you have to fall back on that, you might as well be waving a giant white flag, trollboy.
It screams "I am outclassed intellectually and am really insecure about it, so let me change the subject to something I think I can win on!!!"
Sorry. Any personal failings I may or may not have will still not make you right about any given topic and me wrong.
Fail.
Let me know when you want to get back on topic. Until then, I see no need to feed some immature little boy's ego.
(edit)
And by this I mean, I am simply not going to give you any more attention, which is what you want.
Who's right and who's wrong about what topic? This is my first time ever addressing you, I'm just calling it like it is . Didn't even read what you two are arguing on about..I'm sure it wasn't any more interesting than any of your other posts mr plain vanilla cuck
Vice President Palin.
Those words make any regret I might have vanish in a puff of smoke.
The GOP then offered an elitist rich guy as an alternative that obviously didn't give two s about anybody with less money.
Made the choice easy both times.
grow some balls and vote third party then cuck
I got your Palin RIGHT here.
August 31, 2013
Dead is dead; let Allah sort it out
The usual war on women liberals who mocked vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin (R) for not attending a prestigious college were baffled that she made it on her own, not with inherited wealth or her husband's influence.
And so they laughed when she predicted death panels under Obamacare; they're not laughing now. And they continued their laughter and their mockery over the past few years including more than two months ago, pre President Barack Hussein Obama's (D) allegedly broken "red line" in Syria, when she bluntly stated,
"Militarily, where is our commander in chief? We're talking now more new interventions. I say until we know what we're doing, until we have a commander in chief who knows what he's doing, well, let these radical Islamic countries who aren't even respecting basic human rights, where both sides are slaughtering each other as they scream over an arbitrary red line, 'Allah Akbar,' I say until we have someone who knows what they're doing, I say let Allah sort it out," Palin said at the Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference.
more
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...rt_it_out.html
So what happens to this opinion, if President Obama orders a large crushing military strike?
The people who pay attention to such things who don't have poltical axes to grind say that preparations for that are underway.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3829847.html
CCC buildigns will likely be hit, but I would guess that more likely targets will be air assets. Helicopters, airfields, AAA, ADA, and the like.
I think that what will be targeted will be similar to what happened in Libya. The kinds of heavy weapons and air power that give the Assad government the upper hand when fighting lightly armed rebels.
The most logical thing here would be to seriously degrade Assad's military capabilities.
This is, to me, the most logical outcome.President Obama's national security adviser, Susan Rice, sent out a Tweet on Friday, calling what happened "an apparent CW (chemical weapons) attack." And the commander of U.S. forces in the Mediterranean has ordered Navy warships to move closer to Syria to be ready for a possible cruise missile strike.
Congress OK or no, I am pretty sure something will be done.
Assad has called, and we will get to see what Obama is holding.
I am rather comfortable voting for Democrats generally. I haven't seen anything in any third party candidate that has made me think that voting for them is a good idea.
When I was younger I thought Perot was a good idea (shudders). Now I subject such things to a wee bit more skepticism.
It is also quite probable that any known caches of WMD's that have been identified to now will be hit, IMO.
Based on what the administration is saying and what observers are seeing in the movement of assets, it points to a strike, and likely not a small one. Anything less would be a serious loss of face for the US, and despite what Fox news wants people to believe to get better ratings, that is something that any presidency takes seriously, D or R.
Meh. She jumped the shark years ago.
I can't think of anybody who takes anything she says seriously any more. Do you?
Its a bit like paying attention to a reality TV "star"
Any significant targets have more than likely been moved because our blustery President thought it was a good idea to look and act tough without thinking things through. And what happens if we do hit a stockpile of Sarin gas and it spreads and kills scores of civilians? Will 0bama win another Nobel Peace Prize for that?
Judging from that quote of hers, she has a better grasp of the situation than the Community Organizer in Chief.Meh. She jumped the shark years ago.
I can't think of anybody who takes anything she says seriously any more. Do you?
Its a bit like paying attention to a reality TV "star"
Sarah Palin
Maybe not brilliant, but...
Obama's 'Blink' On Syria Is Politically Brilliant
by Brett LoGiurato at Business Insider
http://www.businessinsider.com/obama...boehner-2013-8"SNIP............................
Obama blinked, but he blinked with a dare. He is daring Congress to say no to limited action against a dictator for the brutal use of chemical weapons against his own people — an attack that the U.S. says killed 1,429 people, including 426 children.
"Here's my question for every member of Congress and every member of the global community: What message will we send if a dictator can gas hundreds of children to death in plain sight and pay no price?" Obama said in a statement from the Rose Garden Saturday.
"What's the purpose of the international system that we've built if a prohibition on the use of chemical weapons that has been agreed to by the governments of 98 percent of the world's people and approved overwhelmingly by the Congress of the United States is not enforced?"
In taking this move, Obama answered the waning enthusiasm from the American public and his allies overseas for intervention. He answered the calls from more than 100 members of Congress who sent him a letter saying he needed their approval. And he answered the American public, 80% of whom want congressional approval.
BusinessInsider pegged it.
AmericanStinker, ignorant non-thinking right-wing toilet paper, still thinks pitbull has ANY merit.
made it on her own?
toxic pitbull single-handedly took McLiar out of the running
death panels?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-31-2013 at 10:07 PM.
boutons stop denying my zionist allegations and stand trial like a man
In his speech Saturday, 0bama said he'll seek Congress's approval but also said that he doesn't NEED their approval. If he really believes Syria needs to be attacked why doesn't he just DO IT. By waiting for Congress to reconvene, 0bama is allowing Assad to kill thousands more of his own people. Don't think for a moment 0bama won't be asked that question.
RG: "Irrational dislike" (for a child mass murdering Nobel Peace Prize winner)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
