Two days on and you still know nothing about the topic.
You keep using age appropriate. For a kinder kid what was it? How did kindergartners survive, throughout history, and not become crack head s without learning "sex ed?
1. What is the problem that this is to fix? You keep assuming alot about me.
2. Seems to me that Chicago should be working harder on keeping kindergartners alive, rather than teach them "sex ed".
You never learned how to look up something for yourself.
Or read.
Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2013/05/2...#ixzz2dlm9vjn8
Do you have the whole world on ignore?
It's funny when people say which isn't even true and misinform other people.
He's just repeating what the email told him!!!It's funny when people say which isn't even true and misinform other people.
Oh wow. Why did we think about this before. We should teach kids about sex before they learn their abc's. That way they won't have sex, or they'll have less sex than if they didn't take the class. Or they'll not get pregnant, because they'll be informed. Now at 14, she'll not perform felatio because of what she learned nine year prior.oh noes! my kids are gonna be educated about sex when they're younger instead of just experimenting with each other to see what it's like! now my daughter will be scared for life even though she probably would've sucked her 14 year old boyfriends because he said he loved her!
like...It's funny when people say which isn't even true and misinform other people.
Yeah I believe completely your link. I'll ignore the fact that all births of all age have dramatically dropped. That one of the states with the biggest decline is Utah. I'll ignore that and just assume like you that it is sex ed. Sex ed also is the reason to the dramatical decline of crime.
Read more: http://healthland.time.com/2013/05/2...#ixzz2dlm9vjn8
Do you have the whole world on ignore?
But a man who's paycheck comes from sex ed classes says that it is sex ed. So lets ignore everything else.
no more naps. In CO, they have to know 100 words, and know all numbers 1-100.
It's amusing to me that this conversation always inevitably turns into a concern for what poor, innocent, helpless little girls are going to do once their abundance of education and knowledge forces them to become s. Young women are particularly in need of better sex education, not only because their bodies are the greatest impacted by STIs and unplanned pregnancy, but also because a greater understanding of their own agency is essential in encouraging better and more thoughtful decisions in their sexual lives.
5 year olds dont get pregnant
Never said they did, eagle eyes.
5 years won't retain any information, and will probably be more confused.
That post that you quoted was a response to a specific post. Cool story tho
so far a bunch of you nuts have been using comparisons to sex ed for teenagers in your justifications for sex ed for 5 year olds. in reality it's not even the same case. most 5 year olds don't really know what sex is, you sickos aren't going to take away their innocence. approaching the age of puberty is the appropriate age for sex ed, not for 5 year olds.
"Mommies and daddies make babies together" isn't terribly confusing. Nor is is difficult to retain. My parents taught me where babies came from when I was six years old (using books and other materials made specifically to instruct children) and I've managed to remember it for twenty-nine years and counting.
I know. The fact that conversation was even taking place is precisely what led to my comment. What started out as outrage about teh gays and liberals brainwashing our children turned into fear of girls being turned into s by access to too much information; a good ol' patriarchal mainstay.
There is no one "age of puberty." Some girls can start menstruating and become pregnant at ten years old. And whether or not kindergarten-age children know the intricacies of sexual intercourse, or whether they should, you're beyond naive if you think kids as young as five don't have some understanding of sexuality as a vague concept. Whether that understanding is based on watching adults interact, or hearing funny noises coming from the parents' bedroom at night, or just recognizing certain pleasure responses in their own bodies, kids know a of a lot more than perhaps we want to believe they do.
I take it you guys who have been arguing against this for 4 pages still haven't read the actual law.
it doesn't matter what's in the law, i don't trust liberals to actually follow the law. they might lead you to believe they'll only teach something along the lines of "mommies and daddies make babies together" but in reality they'll be teaching sexual propaganda and vulgar material. i don't want a sick in the head liberal talking to our nations children about sex and brainwashing them, period. liberals are a sick antihuman cult and they must be exterminated.
K.
This would be a lot more provocative if I thought for even a second you actually believed it. But as just the latest of a long line of over-the-top shticks, I'm unmoved.
i'm as serious as the sky is blue, i have the utmost contempt and disgust for liberals. you may proceed with being provoked and offended for all i give a damn. you sickos are NOT getting your hands on our nations children and indoctrinating them to your sickness.
So that's what this is about? That's age appropriate? You are saying that you want to take away from the teachers teaching so they can be told that mommies and daddies make babies. Seems very legitimate. Exactly what I'd expect a liberal to say. "let's do this great idea and not think of any consequences."
How many of those kids live with a mommy and daddy?
What? What the are you talking about?I know. The fact that conversation was even taking place is precisely what led to my comment. What started out as outrage about teh gays and liberals brainwashing our children turned into fear of girls being turned into s by access to too much information; a good ol' patriarchal mainstay.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
