Reply With Quote
I was discussing the actual topic, remember?
Before your meltdown.
Don't be angry. You can discuss the actual topic at hand for a change. But you won't. Your butthurt stings too much. It's been nice owning u again. Never gets old
I was discussing the actual topic, remember?
Before your meltdown.
You didnt ask anything. You immediately started with whitewash. I didnt get butthurt. I told you to stfu if that was the best you could do. Thats just good solid advice imho.
I commented that this is pretty old news that the government itself released.
You got butthurt.
I then asked what was your purpose of posting 15 year old news?
You stopped talking about it altogether.
After your expected meltdown I laughed while exposing your ban-able tactics u use to evade the facts in the OP, that make u so butthurt for being wrong so much
Keep up the butthurt. And post again in here off topic. I command u to.
Do it, now.
Obama sucks lol
Operation Northwoods was a plan by the govt to kill it's own citizens, and you can't change that fact..let the butthurt commence
Wait, where is the plan to kill US citizens?
Give a quote from the text of the do ent.
When chumps butthurt and losing a debate before it ever starts (which is always), he will lie and immediately call others butthurt
He won't discuss the actual topic, he'll deflect or spin, but won't discuss it.
He knows he'll get his ass handed to him, so he'll just talk about nothing for hours bc life and sex are not something he knows about, tbh
Back to the topic though. Yea this is important for ppl to know. Not many ppl know about it, and it should be spread as much as possible.
Sounds eerily like 9/11 in a lot of those plans.
Hey, while you were busy melting down about me again, I asked you a question about Operation Northwoods.
so ur butthurt and mad about someone posting a factual conspiracy that you haven't even read???
What a gutless ignorant sheeple turd. I don't need to do homework for you if you don't know. It's posted for u to read, you baby. I mean its been out for 15 years and you are complaining that point urself, but don't know about the plan in there on killing US citizens??
Either you're uneducated on it, or you're lying, and both are equally possible answers. Actually its probably both at the same time.
I did read it. I found nothing about killing US citizens.
What a gutless ignorant sheeple turd. I don't need to do homework for you if you don't know. It's posted for u to read, you baby. I mean its been out for 15 years and you are complaining that point urself, but don't know about the plan in there on killing US citizens??
Either you're uneducated on it, or you're lying, and both are equally possible answers. Actually its probably both at the same time.
Your positive claim is that it is a plan to kill US citizens.
Prove it. Should be easy for you.
Then what? Will you 'suddenly' crossover into reality and be a changed got? Will you then admit what our govt really is and does? Will you once and for all actually discuss topics like a human being without all the butthurt? Will you then think about questioning your government for a change? What is the purpose for asking for the quote?
You don't give a , pussy. You just want to spin anything that gets posted, period. That's what cowards with no guts do. You don't care about facts. Sniping and male tail chasing on the net is all your life is about.
lol meltdownThe purpose of asking is to have you prove your claim. Why would you pass up an opportunity to prove yourself right and me wrong?Will you then admit what our govt really is and does? Will you once and for all actually discuss topics like a human being without all the butthurt? Will you then think about questioning your government for a change? What is the purpose for asking for the quote?
lol meltdownYou don't give a , pussy. You just want to spin anything that gets posted, period. That's what cowards with no guts do. You don't care about facts. Sniping and male tail chasing on the net is all your life is about.
I asked you for the facts about Operation Northwoods. You said it was a plan to kill US citizens. If that's indeed a fact, it will be easy for you to prove using the text of Operation Northwoods you claim to know quite well.
No meltdown, just stating what you actually are, tbh. But u know that.
And thanks for confirming that u only want a quote so that you can spin it.
As far as an opportunity goes, the proof is there, I don't have your mindset of vendettas like you, but thanks also for admitting how you normally think.
Let's me know how badly I actually am in ur head.
So I am right and you are wrong: there was no plan in Operation Northwoods to kill US citizens.
No meltdown, just stating what you actually are, tbh. But u know that.
And thanks for confirming that u only want a quote so that you can spin it.
As far as an opportunity goes, the proof is there, I don't have your mindset of vendettas like you, but thanks also for admitting how you normally think.
Let's me know how badly I actually am in ur head.
The only question is were you lying about it or just completely ignorant.
Now you are doing everything in your power to not talk about Operation Northwoods.
You will never talk about it again.
Page 8. Paragraph 3.A. Now Chump, stfu and gtfo, tbh.
There is no mention of that ship's being manned. You made a faulty assumption.
Page 8. Paragraph 4. Planning terror campaigns in urban centers, which involve the detonation of bombs in public places.
Plastic bombs used "to the extent of wounding" Cuban refugees -- not US citizens.
Are you reading this for the first time?
A ship without anyone on board would not serve this purpose. We have to assume they would sink a ship with sailors on board.
Bombs detonated in public places within the U.S., yeah that just gets honorable mention, tbh. Pretty sure they aren't planning fatalities, but also pretty sure fatalities would help their cause, and that these planners wouldn't be opposed, tbh.
No, because in the very next paragraph they talk of sinking unmanned ships elsewhere.
Why do you assume that would be the only plan in this entire do ent that would kill potentially hundreds of sailors and why would their deaths be necessary if actual deaths were not necessary in any other plan -- especially the ones that include sinking boats?
And that whole "load a plane with CIA operatives, replace it midflight with a drone flight for later destruction...," I'll give that an honorable mention as well.
Sorry, it's not in the do ent.
SA210's claim is that was the plan. It's not the plan.
You are reading this for the first time.
I'm glad you learned this had nothing to do with planning the killing of US citizens.
SA210 was wrong.
Lets give a shout out to the lying, conniving, scheming, murderous, nefarious depths the MIC will go to start a war, tbh. Of which casualties serve the end goal, and are never ruled out even when not explicitly sought.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
