2013 Patriots Thread

[Blake]

moving the goalposts from "They chose Amendola over Welker!" to "They didn't express the desire to give Wes Welker a rim job like they should have!"

They offered him more money than Denver gave him. What else should they have done? Paid you to fly to Foxboro and suck his ?

It's not about what Denver gave Welker. It's about what they ended up giving Amendola.

you and Mono's disdain for Welker still amazes me.

It's got you so bad that you backed yourself into a horrible $100 wager that I should easily win.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

It's not about what Denver gave Welker. It's about what they ended up giving Amendola.

you and Mono's disdain for Welker still amazes me.

It's got you so bad that you backed yourself into a horrible $100 that I should easily win.

now it's about what they ended up giving Amendola? How? They offered Welker a better deal than what they offered Amendola and he rejected it. By the time Welker got a reality check about what he was really worth they had already agreed in principal with Amendola.

I like how you pick and choose what it is/isn't about after I debunk whatever made up point you make about it.

lol using the bet you're barely winning after one week only because the refs gave Welker credit for a drop as proof that I'm biased. The fact you think the bet is such a sealed deal says a lot more about your bias than it does mine.

[J.T.]

I was about to take Vereen in det fantasy draft where I drafted for home girl and some other chic sniped me like 2 picks ahead. Ended up taking Mark Ingram, which is a ty pick as it is but I was just looking for a bye week body at that point anyway. Home girl lost week 1 by 12 points but her opponent had Peyton and the starters I drafted for her ing owned so not feeling that bad about the loss when the opponents QB went off for 7 TDs which won't happen again.

[spurraider21]

Why does Blake still pretend they deliberately chose Amendola over Welker when that's not at all how it happened?

Spygate re s
They're the flukiest play in NFL history and a dropped Welker pass/Gronk injury away from having two rings since the Spygate incident happened. Raiders fans would kill for the post spygate stretch New England has had from 2007-2012 where they've supposedly been terrible without cameras.

lol you were a bull call from not making your first superbowl in the brady era, after which they would have handed the reigns back to Bledsoe and ed it all up.

[spurraider21]

It's not about what Denver gave Welker. It's about what they ended up giving Amendola.

you and Mono's disdain for Welker still amazes me.

It's got you so bad that you backed yourself into a horrible $100 wager that I should easily win.

sour grapes is all it is

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

lol you were a bull call from not making your first superbowl in the brady era, after which they would have handed the reigns back to Bledsoe and ed it all up.

Cool. Idk how that has anything to do with what I said.

I also don't see how a call was bull when it was exactly according to an NFL rule. Before you turn that into a strawman like every Raiders fan does, I agree the tuck rule itself is total bull , but the call made was according to NFL rules.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

sour grapes is all it is

sour grapes is Raiderfan still complaining about a call that was made over a decade ago

[Blake]

now it's about what they ended up giving Amendola? How? They offered Welker a better deal than what they offered Amendola and he rejected it. By the time Welker got a reality check about what he was really worth they had already agreed in principal with Amendola.

I like how you pick and choose what it is/isn't about after I debunk whatever made up point you make about it.

lol using the bet you're barely winning after one week only because the refs gave Welker credit for a drop as proof that I'm biased. The fact you think the bet is such a sealed deal says a lot more about your bias than it does mine.

I have no idea what you're ranting about here.

All i see is Welker rage.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

I have no idea what you're ranting about here.

All i see is Welker rage.

That's telling me

[spurraider21]

Cool. Idk how that has anything to do with what I said.

I also don't see how a call was bull when it was exactly according to an NFL rule. Before you turn that into a strawman like every Raiders fan does, I agree the tuck rule itself is total bull , but the call made was according to NFL rules.

it wasn't even accurate, thats the problem with the whole thing. brady had both his hands on the ball at the time of the fumble, meaning the pump fake and the "tuck" was already complete. not sure where the strawman came from though. you make a claim about how you were a fluke play from winning since spygate. i'm saying you were a bull call from never winning anything in the first place

[spurraider21]

sour grapes is Raiderfan still complaining about a call that was made over a decade ago

thats saltiness . sour grapes is a different thing tbh

sour grapes over tuck rule would have been like "oh we got ed over? whatever, didn't want to win the superbowl anyway." which is the defensive mechanisms a lot of pats fans are going to with welker gone. "well he was a choker anyway"

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

thats saltiness . sour grapes is a different thing tbh

sour grapes over tuck rule would have been like "oh we got ed over? whatever, didn't want to win the superbowl anyway." which is the defensive mechanisms a lot of pats fans are going to with welker gone. "well he was a choker anyway"

If that's sour grapes, then it's not what I have over Welker. Ask Blake, mono and I have been arguing with him about Welker saying we hated him well before he left. It's not like we're Lakers fans who went from saying #stayD12 to saying we never wanted Dwight.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

random question Blake, who's the "Christian Soldier" you're referencing in the UTSA thread?

[Clipper Nation]

sour grapes is Raiderfan still complaining about a call that was made over a decade ago

Tbh, the two Patsfans that existed pre-Brady probably still whine about the Sugar Bear Hamilton roughing the passer call from 1976

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

Tbh, the two Patsfans that existed pre-Brady probably still whine about the Sugar Bear Hamilton roughing the passer call from 1976

And that would still pale in comparison to your butthurt over New England because they repeatedly beat your team of perennial chokers.

[monosylab1k]

it wasn't even accurate, thats the problem with the whole thing. brady had both his hands on the ball at the time of the fumble, meaning the pump fake and the "tuck" was already complete. not sure where the strawman came from though. you make a claim about how you were a fluke play from winning since spygate. i'm saying you were a bull call from never winning anything in the first place

Yeah two hands on the ball doesn't matter, especially considering Brady had a second hand on the ball for about .01 seconds before getting earholed by Woodson. It was called the "TUCK" Rule for a reason.

And Belichick was never going back to Bledsoe, and the Patriots would still have 2 les without the Tuck Game.

[HI-FI]

The Pats MVP should have at least a decent year, like usual....

"Tom, 54 is the Mike"
"I'm an excellent driver."
"uh oh, fifteen minutes to Judge Wapner."
"January 12, 1965. Very snowy that day. 7.2 inches of snow that day."

[Avante]

it wasn't even accurate, thats the problem with the whole thing. brady had both his hands on the ball at the time of the fumble, meaning the pump fake and the "tuck" was already complete. not sure where the strawman came from though. you make a claim about how you were a fluke play from winning since spygate. i'm saying you were a bull call from never winning anything in the first place

Everyone who knows football knows that was the worst call ever. You got it bro!

I had never seen a ..tuck rule. before or after. I didn't know there was one and neither did anyone else.

[spurraider21]

Yeah two hands on the ball doesn't matter, especially considering Brady had a second hand on the ball for about .01 seconds before getting earholed by Woodson. It was called the "TUCK" Rule for a reason.

And Belichick was never going back to Bledsoe, and the Patriots would still have 2 les without the Tuck Game.

If its so lightning close that you can't tell, call on the field shouldn't be overturned. There's a big reason it's widely considered one of the worst blown calls in sports. It was a dumb rule, sure. But the rule didnt even apply

[Blake]

random question Blake, who's the "Christian Soldier" you're referencing in the UTSA thread?

i can't remember his name. Do you remember who it was that had "galatians 1:1" under his avatar?

[Avante]

If its so lightning close that you can't tell, call on the field shouldn't be overturned. There's a big reason it's widely considered one of the worst blown calls in sports. It was a dumb rule, sure. But the rule didnt even apply

paste

Walt Coleman: "There wasn't much conversation with the other officials because everybody's looking at something different. Nobody sees the action of the quarterback except me. Based on what I saw and the information that I had, I ruled it as a fumble. If you ruled it incomplete you could not correct that with replay. That's basically just the way we were trained."

[Clipper Nation]

The Tuck Rule was bull , and before the Patsfans tell me I'm "just salty about their success" again, note that I hate the Raiders just as much....

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

i can't remember his name. Do you remember who it was that had "galatians 1:1" under his avatar?

no

Are you thinking of that SKULL1 gnsf or whatever who has regular meltdowns upstairs and has a sig full of jeebo ism and "Semper Fi, mother er!" mili type ?

[monosylab1k]

If its so lightning close that you can't tell, call on the field shouldn't be overturned. There's a big reason it's widely considered one of the worst blown calls in sports. It was a dumb rule, sure. But the rule didnt even apply

BRADY'S LEFT HAND ON THE BALL IS IRRELEVANT. Your reading comprehension is .

Also, the reason most people think it's a "blown" call is because nobody bothered to read the rule. They followed on like the sheep they are. Just because it's a bad rule doesn't mean it shouldn't be enforced. People think just because it's a ty rule that it's a bad call. Absolutely not. It's a ty rule that was absolutely called correctly if you ever bothered to read the actual rule.

[DUNCANownsKOBE]

The Tuck Rule was bull , and before the Patsfans tell me I'm "just salty about their success" again, note that I hate the Raiders just as much....

You won't find many Patsfans who think the rule itself wasn't bull .

arguing strawmans with yourself