again, why is this ignored?
weed or not, trayvon had a history of fighting. my point is quit making assumptions because you think "you don't find something believable"
again, why is this ignored?
If that was the case then why didn't the Defense use it to scare more white people into believing that he was a drugged out violent black thug?
It obviously wasn't necessary considering the verdict.
Trayvon got a history of getting into fights? Looks like you are the one assuming?
Oh please.
yes, he did, and that doesn't even require assumption tbh
what history? where is the proof?
Show me.
Trayvon: “I lost da 1st roundbut won da 2nd nd 3rd.”
Friend: “Ohhh So It Wass 3 Rounds? Damn well at least yu wonn lol but yuu needa stop fighting.”
Trayvon: “Nay im not done with fool….. he gone hav 2 see me again.”
Friend: “Nooo… Stop, yuu waint gonn bee satisified till yuh suspended again, huh?”
Sounds like a story changed but at which end who knows. It's moot anyway isn't going to happen to him. He still seems to be on a downward spiral. Hopefully he doesn't kill anyone else.
wait this is your evidence ? so you mean to tell me you're going to take the tweets of a fire lean sippin', gun totin', hoodie wearing thug as the truth?
![]()
who's word would you rather have? as opposed to the kid himself
So how you know the person he fought is a "creepy ass cracca"? Are you assuming that part?
Lol all he got is a tweet. Zimmerman got police records.
that's trayvon's quote as well, according to the witness on the phone with him
and do those police records prove guilt? nope
You didn't answer my question, are you assuming the guy he fought is white?
Seriously that's the stance your taking about police records? They sure do prove a whole lot more guilt than text from an adolescent teen trying to be hard.
i never said the dude he fought was white. all i said was he has a history of fighting, and that he called zimmerman a creepy ass cracka
what part of the police record proves zimmerman's guilt in the trayvon martin case or in this latest 911 call?
so you're assuming what they said and the tweets are true? you have no proof or police statements or school records? gotcha.
lol suddenly you want proof... a second ago you were so sure Zimmerman was guilty without any proof.
point made
i was sure he has a violent past, which he does and there is proof lol. i am sure he attacked his wife which she said and later retracted and i based that off of his violent past. you claimed trayvon had a violent past and the only proof you have are tweets lol.
what was your point?????
violent past =/= guilty of this crime
how can you possibly and moan about the justice system if you are "so sure" this guy is guilty when there is never any evidence or proof at all
You said,
I guess the confusion came from the bad grammar since it's a fragmented sentence. Looks like you said he has a history of fighting a white guy.is it more believable than a drug using kid with a history of violence attacking a creepy ass cracka?
I was talking about his police reports that details his physical confrontations such as the one in a bar because he got busted letting a minor drink.
^neither of which bear any relevance to the case at hand
WTF, we're not talking about the case. We are talking about this S ie situation and George's past violence.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)