Suns: Official thread for teams that won 3 championships in the last decade (2003-2013)

[LkrFan]

OP dumb, no counting ass logged out! Either he couldn't take the heat, or he couldn't spell it.

"Apologize for your math."

[Arnold Toht]

OP

[AchillesHeel]

le clearly says 2003-2013

read the ing le, 2-timers.

[AchillesHeel]

10 years is 10 years, if you were born in 2003, you'd be 10 years old in 2013, not 11. If Spurs won a le in 2003, in 2013 it would be 10 years from when they won it in 03.

You do the math, dumb s.

And once again, read the ing le, 2-timers.

[AchillesHeel]

Spurs have won 3 championships in the last 10 years, Lakers have won 2. This thread is only reserved for 3-timers. Heat and Spurs are the only 3-timers, so I'll have to ask you to leave now.

needed a Pisstons fan to even dare post here

it's 11 years, not 10, learn to do math pls

[LkrFan]

I bet the P is a natural blonde

[JamStone]

10 years is 10 years, if you were born in 2003, you'd be 10 years old in 2013, not 11. If Spurs won a le in 2003, in 2013 it would be 10 years from when they won it in 03.

You do the math, dumb s.

And once again, read the ing le, 2-timers.

You can't be serious. If you were born in 2003, you turn 10 in 2013 ELEVEN years later because you starting counting at 1 in 2004. You're not 1 year old on the day of your birth. That can't be a serious comment.

Here, this will make it clear and simple. I'm going to list the years from 2003 to 2013 and we count how many they are together. Ready class?

2003 - 1
2004 - 2
2005 - 3
2006 - 4
2007 - 5
2008 - 6
2009 - 7
2010 - 8
2011 - 9
2012 - 10
2013 - 11

2003-2013 is 11 years, son. I'm not sure why you're trying to fight it. How many NBA championship teams have there been in "your" version of the "past decade" if you include 2003? 11, not 10. Pal, listen up. Look at me. That's wrong, buddy. The last 10 NBA championship teams run from 2004-2013. That's the past decade of championship teams. It does not include 2003.

If you wanted a loose interpretation of the word "decade," you could have said "in the past decade or so." But it's clear you didn't want a loose interpretation of the word decade because you wanted to set a line of demarcation right at 2003 to include 2003. So you wanted your decade to be 11 years, not 10, not 12, not 43. But a decade is specifically 10 years.

Instead of getting mad and being defensive and defiant, you could have just acknowledged your mistake and owned it. , we all make mistakes. We all post stupid on the messageboards from time to time. When you get called out for it, you should own it. Accept it. Now be a good little boy and apologize to the forum for your stupid math.

[Arnold Toht]

OP a heat fan

[LkrFan]

You can't be serious. If you were born in 2003, you turn 10 in 2013 ELEVEN years later because you starting counting at 1 in 2004. You're not 1 year old on the day of your birth. That can't be a serious comment.

Here, this will make it clear and simple. I'm going to list the years from 2003 to 2013 and we count how many they are together. Ready class?

2003 - 1
2004 - 2
2005 - 3
2006 - 4
2007 - 5
2008 - 6
2009 - 7
2010 - 8
2011 - 9
2012 - 10
2013 - 11

2003-2013 is 11 years, son. I'm not sure why you're trying to fight it. How many NBA championship teams have there been in "your" version of the "past decade" if you include 2003? 11, not 10. Pal, listen up. Look at me. That's wrong, buddy. The last 10 NBA championship teams run from 2004-2013. That's the past decade of championship teams. It does not include 2003.

If you wanted a loose interpretation of the word "decade," you could have said "in the past decade or so." But it's clear you didn't want a loose interpretation of the word decade because you wanted to set a line of demarcation right at 2003 to include 2003. So you wanted your decade to be 11 years, not 10, not 12, not 43. But a decade is specifically 10 years.

Instead of getting mad and being defensive and defiant, you could have just acknowledged your mistake and owned it. , we all make mistakes. We all post stupid on the messageboards from time to time. When you get called out for it, you should own it. Accept it. Now be a good little boy and apologize to the forum for your stupid math.

LkrFan Productions presents, The Ownage! starring Jamstone (Pippen) v. AchillesHeel the village idiot (Ewing):





Will he wise up and finally apologize for his math? Stay tuned...

[Banzai]

here here...at firest i thought 2000=2013 woops

[spurraider21]

You can't be serious. If you were born in 2003, you turn 10 in 2013 ELEVEN years later because you starting counting at 1 in 2004. You're not 1 year old on the day of your birth. That can't be a serious comment.

Here, this will make it clear and simple. I'm going to list the years from 2003 to 2013 and we count how many they are together. Ready class?

2003 - 1
2004 - 2
2005 - 3
2006 - 4
2007 - 5
2008 - 6
2009 - 7
2010 - 8
2011 - 9
2012 - 10
2013 - 11

2003-2013 is 11 years, son. I'm not sure why you're trying to fight it. How many NBA championship teams have there been in "your" version of the "past decade" if you include 2003? 11, not 10. Pal, listen up. Look at me. That's wrong, buddy. The last 10 NBA championship teams run from 2004-2013. That's the past decade of championship teams. It does not include 2003.

If you wanted a loose interpretation of the word "decade," you could have said "in the past decade or so." But it's clear you didn't want a loose interpretation of the word decade because you wanted to set a line of demarcation right at 2003 to include 2003. So you wanted your decade to be 11 years, not 10, not 12, not 43. But a decade is specifically 10 years.

Instead of getting mad and being defensive and defiant, you could have just acknowledged your mistake and owned it. , we all make mistakes. We all post stupid on the messageboards from time to time. When you get called out for it, you should own it. Accept it. Now be a good little boy and apologize to the forum for your stupid math.

tbh, it is currently 2013. what year was it 10 years ago? 1 year ago was '12. 2 years ago was '11. 3 years ago was '10. 4 years ago was '09, 5 years ago was '08, 6 years ago was '07, 7 years ago was '06, 8 years ago was '05, 9 years ago was '04. 10 years ago was '03.

[AchillesHeel]

I'm not apologizing for my "math", ok, I shouldn't have used the word "decade" and I thought before posting y'all s would start crying about it, which is why I added 2003-2013 to my le, I'm sorry if some of you s can't read. 2003-2013 is what I said, Lakers won 2 les after their threepeat, Spurs won 3 les after the Lakers threepeated.

Oh and READ THE ING LE. Spur and Heat fans only, you know, the teams that have been relevant and who were the best of their conference.

[Arnold Toht]

^
If you're going to arbitrarily include the 2003 le, at least le it 2002-2013 because the Spurs won in the 2002-03 NBA season. The first season from 2003-2013 is the 03-04 season.

So shut the up.

[elmanutres]

^
If you're going to arbitrarily include the 2003 le, at least le it 2002-2013 because the Spurs won in the 2002-03 NBA season. The first season from 2003-2013 is the 03-04 season.

So shut the up.

2 timer since 2003 speaking

[Arnold Toht]

^ 0-timer since 07 speaking

[elmanutres]

^ 0-timer since 07 speaking

why you so scared to use the quote button pussy.

[Arnold Toht]

^ Why won't you admit 6?

[elmanutres]

^ Why won't you admit 6?

I do admit 6. In fact i have admitted this to you a thread long ago. The problem I have is that the lakers are not the ones that have caused 6. Like i'm gonna kiss laker fans ass. laker fan are the ones that are supposed to be kissing spursfan ass from the sweep. while spur fan kisses miami fan ass. But Laker fan refuses to and they try to reap the benefits of 6 like if they were heat fan.

[Arnold Toht]

^ You salty over 6.

[elmanutres]

^ You salty over 6.

no I'm not. I got over it a week after the finals. It's just pathetic you are too scared of revealing that laker jersey under your heat jersey