Reply With Quote
Reece only ran for 271 last year (on 4.6 ypa) but he had over 50 receptions which is where his value lies. He was a WR in college. They'll line up in an old school I-formation then motion him out wide where he'll have a linebacker on him
That's telling me
Reece only ran for 271 last year (on 4.6 ypa) but he had over 50 receptions which is where his value lies. He was a WR in college. They'll line up in an old school I-formation then motion him out wide where he'll have a linebacker on him
You know, if mr reading comprehension read that post a little closer, you would realize I never actually accused pats fan of doing so. Also, hyperbole is a common form of sarcasm. I wouldn't "rather talk pats" but nobody on this forum (understandably so) talks about the raiders. Ill save that for my raider forummono said "Dobson looks like he can develop into a solid receiver"......how exactly is that " ing about how great he's gna be"
your reading comprehension being , per the usual
So you never accused pats fans of " ing about how great he's gna be" but felt like scoffing pats fans for " ing about how great he's gna be"
That makes tons of sense.
your reading comprehension must be . i didn't even mention the pats or patsfan once in that post
your backpedaling and deliberate intellectual dishonesty is hilarious
i pressed control+f and typed "pats" and nothing came uptbh my team isn't really relevant. it's why the raiders thread has like 11 comments on it. its why nobody would comment if somebody opened a bobcats thread downstairs except for
Yeah, I totally buy that.
Context would clearly tell you I was responding to his "why do you tal about the pats more than the raiders" which is why my entire ing post was about why I don't bother talking raiders that much on ST
Yeah, I totally buy that.
Okay well then go ahead and give some reasoning for why you think Dobson = Louis Murphy. I gave reasons why i think he could possibly develop into a good receiver. Give reasons why you think he'll have the Murphy career path.
Or just admit you're a bitter, jealous Raiders fan with no intent to talk football and only came into this thread to talk mindless .
I think they're both physically talented. Both had ability to get separation on the NFL level. Murphy was a big play guy that was havin moderate success early on with ing jawalrus at the helm. He had solid not great hands and would make head scratching plays after a big play. Would make dumb mental mistakes too like running the wrong routes.
I just saw a lot of similarity based on the limited action I've seen Dobson in. Fwiw it's also why I'm not incredibly high on Denarius Moore. Loaded with talent/potential. Moore was one of the best rookie receivers in the league a couple of years ago (of course not on the tier of Julio or AJ) but was/is a bonehead. Granted Moore has more upside than Murphy ever did.
Like anybody else, it's not like I've seen miles of Dobson footage, but I drew a comparison. Sorry if it hit you in a sensitive spot
Wow! All this instant analysis and ability to chart an NFL career after one game of pro experience! You can make projections faster than most NFL coaches and scouts! Where do you pull out all this analytical data? Oh wait, don't tell me I already know - your ass.
He's played in one NFL game. It's more than reasonable to say "he showed potential". It's also reasonable to say "he looked godawful and has a really long way to go if he ever wants to be a decent player." It's ing re ed to say "He'll have a ty career like this other guy".
But nice try, Bitter Raiders Fan.
Dobson's biggest issue was simply having the drops. That could be a number of things. I won't hold a receiver playing in his first game dropping passes against him. There were also a few finesse passes to him Brady simply missed on as Brady has never been an extremely accurate finesse passer. He's basically the anti-Phillip Rivers, since Rivers sucks at every kind of throw except finesse passes
The one aspect of the Murphy/Dobson "career path" comparison I'd agree with is the fact they were launched into WAY too much a role their rookie year simply because the other receivers on their respective team sucked.
On a side note, it's also one thing when Brady yells about running the wrong route as that's a case of the receiver not preparing, but yelling at a young receiver for dropping the ball is counter productive and accomplishes nothing. All it does is make the receiver more nervous the next time a ball's thrown his way.
I saw a physically talente receiver run wrong routes and let several balls get away from him despite having one if the best qb's of all time puttin it between the numbers no also saw Murphy making big plays when the biggest bust in league history chucking it up. Murphy also had big games with Bruce gradkowski. I'm saying for a guy that got plenty of first team reps throughout camp (where he was reportedly having a tough time), preseason (where he had some dubious drops and fell behind thompkins) he still looked lost out there despite natural talent. He's soft between the ears.
Brah, i know he's only played one game, but what kind of career path do you project for Robert Woods? I'm thinking Randy Moss.
Can't wait for the tidal wave of I'm going to get when Dobson has a good game
Don't worry too much about it. Calling people who down New England bitter is a defense mechanism that most of the Pats fans have on this board for some reason. During the AFC Championship thread last year, a few of them were calling me bitter and biased for saying that Flacco puts up better numbers in Ravens/Pats match-ups than Brady does. They pretty much ignore me now.Can't wait for the tidal wave of I'm going to get when Dobson has a good game
As as Spurs fan, I'm sure you understand why they're so dismissive of Raiders fans, though. It's pretty much the same relationship that a lot of Spurs fans have to Suns fans.
Go find the thread where this happened. We called you bitter because you were saying the Texans should beat New England.
This exchange comes to mind since it involves you. We were game-planning during the AFCC thread.
Go find the thread where this happened. We called you bitter because you were saying the Texans should beat New England.
Funny, after you lost your ad hominem argument, you didn't have too much to say on the topic. The point is that your only way of deflecting what turned out to be sound criticism of the Patriots is that I was obviously biased.
Also, how is what I'm saying a straw man? There's no other argument I am ignoring by bringing this up. If you're referring to the Dobson discussion, don't worry. I don't think I have any room to make fun of anyone's receiving corps right now.
I called you biased for saying Brady hasn't been as good. Where did I call you biased for saying Flacco put up better numbers?
you even had to "clarify" what you were saying
Actually I didn't even call you biased for that now that I re-read it. I called you biased about predicting the Ravens would win. Yes that was laughably wrong but that's not relevant to you revising what the exchange was.
Stupid double-post.
Chinook better thank Football Jesus everyday that his team fluked their way to a le. His re ed homer takes wouldn't get the time of day from anyone here if it wasn't for that.
Then you should have just said "Aaron Dobson reminds me alot of Louis Murphy". But of course your salty ass had to word it re edly. But your point was never to seriously talk football. Just admit that and quit backtracking.
Everybody is a homer and biased except for pats fans tbh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions