i know you think you're real cute with your little be@ner troll whoever the you are but it's lame and obnoxious
u first racist
i know you think you're real cute with your little be@ner troll whoever the you are but it's lame and obnoxious
i am cute
ur just a bich
gotspeak
Specificly, he consistently denounces programs as wasteful and against the public good and then uses them. He thinks it's funny that his generation has left a big burger for the rest of us because he is going to be dead by the time it really starts going to go to to . As long as he gets his he doesn't care about how it will effect the whole. He has made that clear and seems to take pride in it. At least he fronts as if he does.
If you want to argue on behalf of objectivism then go right ahead.
it. Why not just repeal vigilante laws too. It will be great!
hypersensitive little got...
Quit voting for that and I'll quit taking advantage of it. You want to promote the use of electric vehicles by giving tax credits? Fine. You modified my behavior. I took advantage of them and got free electric vehicles. You want to promote the use of solar energy by giving tax credits? Fine. You modified my behavior and I took advantage of them and am saving $100+ a month that I can spend on cigars and booze. You want the Federal government to subsidize health care? Fine. You modified my behavior. I'll quit providing health care for my employees and you can have what you want and I can save a load of money...I'm tentatively thinking about 50K a year. Thats a lot of hookers and blow. Thanks, !
I just point out that these liberal programs you support aren't necessarily in your best interest.
If giving a about the future of society makes me hypersensitive then I can live with that.
I don't 'vote for that .' Try again.
Way to not take personal responsibility though. Modified your behavior? What a ing cop out. You will take whatever as long it doesn't cost you and you don't give a damn what it costs anyone else.
I just want it pointed out that people that despise freeloaders can look to you for their vitriol.
I work 60+ hour weeks. I'm not freeloading off anyone.
Do you intentionally pay more taxes that you are legally obligated to pay?
I don't vote a tax reduction for myself as a matter of course. I am going to go out on a limb and say that you do.
And for someone who works 60 hours a week you seem to have plenty of time to off on this forum most of every day. ing off on the internet while you have work crews out doing is hardly compelling. Taking handouts is taking handouts and it's obvious you will take any that you can. You call it having your behavior modified rather than taking responsibility for it. It's typical cognitive dissonance. Cliche really.
@ mr. righteous and high and mighty ing off on the internet all day.
McCain
You and he are equally irrelevant attention s.
What are you talking about. I have time while stuff assembles to browse from time to time but I am not even at work right now. I am guessing you on the other hand are at 'work.'
At least you are not trying to deny what you are anymore. Instead you are trying to paint me as just like you. That also is very telling.
And you would think that McCain is irrelevant. Shows how much a en you have ie none. Do you do anything but bluster? Makes me wonder really.
I heard some people were shot yesterday.
Yeah.
"He was an IT contractor. He had medium security clearance, high enough to work at multiple Navy offices over the summer. He had an ID badge to enter the Navy Yard. His employer says the shooter jumped through all the right hoops. "
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/17/us/nav...owns-unknowns/
show me obamas proof.
Show me your proof that the UN report says Obama is full of .
obama made the accusation. he needs to provide the evidence chump
There is nothing in the UN report that contradicts Obama's information on what occurred. You act as if this report totally contradicted Obama's account of what happened, so he went ahead and had 12 Americans killed to distract the public. You're ridiculous.
You just made an accusation. You need to provide the evidence.
As I understand it the UN report just verified Sarin was used, and didn't have an opinion on who used it.
If we are going to claim Assad used it a little real proof isn't out of the question.
Saying "Trust me, I've read the classified reports and he did it" doesn't really fly anymore.
Iraq and WMD's pretty well poisoned the "trust me" well.
While the report’s authors did not assign blame for the attack on the outskirts of Damascus, the details it do ented included the large size and particular shape of the munitions and the precise direction from which two of them had been fired. Taken together, that information appeared to undercut arguments by President Bashar al-Assad of Syria that rebel forces, who are not known to possess such weapons or the training or ability to use them, had been responsible.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/wo...d-nations.html
What other possible conclusion could you come to?
Lol believing what you hear from the Zionist puppet committee..dude you're something else
OK, what do you say happened and what is your source?
The U.N. didnt say it was the Syrian Govt... what evidence is the US using, they havent even been in Syria, they are watching from a distance, and making these accusations.. Tell me Chump, did they find the "WMD's" in Iraq yet?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)