Ok cool. Your back pedal is noted.
so it's subjective five years ago, but today it's definitive.Subjective. But regardless it sure as aint the best now, nor does it look like it can be anytime soon.
smh utsa .
That's terrible logic per the usual from lolutsa.... the "best conference" is cyclical, it's not always going to be the SEC.... smart programs join conferences that fit geographically, culturally, and/or academically, not which conference has the most media hype at the moment, tbh....
Aggy could have made their own third tier TV deal but ran away butthurt about UT's.They get payed the same amount of $ as everyone else in the conference
Still butthurt.
lol ok
Keep thinking a move to the SEC doesnt benefit any Big 12 member just because it doesnt benefit UT.
If the Big 12 had won seven consecutive national championships prior to 2007 it wouldnt have been subjective. But they didnt.so it's subjective five years ago, but today it's definitive.
smh utsa .
Most schools should move to a better conference except for greedy ass UT. To me the SEC is the pinnacle.
Yeah FkLA ........... Colorado, Nebraska, Missouri and A&M were all delusional about the B12. LMAO!!!!!
Ok, keep moving goalposts around, re .
les aren't a sole indicator of overall conference power. it's still subjective.If the Big 12 had won seven consecutive national championships prior to 2007 it wouldnt have been subjective. But they didnt.
You're still re ed.
What has Colorado gained by joining the Pac 12?
Call it what you want. Truth is UT is a terrible example.
Never said its the only one but when you win 7 of them in a row, youre kinda dominating tbh.les aren't a sole indicator of overall conference power. it's still subjective.
You're still re ed.
Please post your list of things that determine the power of a conference, though. Id love to see it.
Theyre in a better, more stable conference for one. Getting a fair share of revenue, including revenue from the PAC 12 Network, must be nice as well.
The team itself is terrible and wouldve been just as bad in the Big 12.
If you don't like using UT, then your premise fails.
It was the only criteria you used.Never said its the only one but when you win 7 of them in a row, youre kinda dominating tbh.
Please post your list of things that determine the power of a conference, though. Id love to see it.
Rankings during the year are a great determining factor. Expert consensus opinion is nice too. Maybe throw in some individual accolades as well.
You kinda suck at this.
Oh look what I'm doing
Smh utsa s
aside from A&M, as they have been discussed entirely too much... have any of those schools truly benefitted from leaving the B12?
oh so in other words it really only benefits crappy schools to leave for "better" conferences?
Bottom line, the SEC is a better more well run conference that is fair to ALLLLLL of the teams in it. In the B12, there is UT and everyone else period. We all know this, except for you Flake.
OU seems to be fine in the B12, as is K-State, Tech, Okie State, and WVU.
LOL..........OU wanted out a couple of years ago too, and was convinced to stay by a financial agreement from UT. TT was hanging onto UTs ballsack just like all the leftovers. Im surprised WVU jumped ship.
do you know how much the big 12 distributed to each school this past year?
Do you know how much the sec distributed to each school this past year?
nothing to discuss with you until you show some numbers.
smh utsa
Ok, here ya go. Look at these numbers I found on google......uhhh, ohh...damn look at the time. Hey man, I gotta roll out home now. Going to chase my woman down lick her asshole and squeeze her massive breasts before I plow into her sweet kitten. Have a great evening.
thank your woman for me for allowing you to have just enough time to roll in here and look ignorant and stupid.Ok, here ya go. Look at these numbers I found on google......uhhh, ohh...damn look at the time. Hey man, I gotta roll out home now. Going to chase my woman down lick her asshole and squeeze her massive breasts before I plow into her sweet kitten. Have a great evening.
Smh dumb utsa
wear a tongue condom
No it's not, just ask Arkansas, who got ed out of their traditional Thanksgiving matchup to accommodate lolaggie, or LSU, who's getting screwed by the SEC's current "temporary schedule" plan while they work out a long-term schedule format.....
There's a reason why the SEC's headquarters are so close to Alabama's campus, tbh
The Pac-12 is best as far as equal fairness/revenue sharing to all the teams imo. It's not by any stretch of the imagination a well run conference though given how much it's routinely embarrassed on the national stage by a Pac-12 ref ing up and changing the outcome of a game.
Ok, it fails for UT. For everybody else, unless theyre getting money from the LHN, it doesn't. Can you atleast agree to that dummy ?
Not much else needs to be looked at when you win 7 consecutive national les. Even using the criteria listed though, which conference comes close ?It was the only criteria you used.
Rankings during the year are a great determining factor. Expert consensus opinion is nice too. Maybe throw in some individual accolades as well.
Explain why Texas Tech should go to the SEC.
Go.
that's fine.Not much else needs to be looked at when you win 7 consecutive national les. Even using the criteria listed though, which conference comes close ?
If you have a clear path to the le game through your conference, why would you want to make it tougher on yourself by moving to a tougher conference?
Hmm, lets see. In my personal opinion...
1. You can pitch the SEC to the best recruits. You cant really pitch the Big 12 since youre the 3rd-4th option for most of them in your conference.
2. You would get money from the SEC Network once it gets going.
3. Youre not one of those schools that has a clear path to the le game through the Big 12.
4. The SEC is a better, more stable conference than the present day Big 12.
5. The SEC has a larger national audience. More exposure for Tech and Lubbock.
Spur|n|Austin come in here and redeem Tech. Please tell me if the SEC came calling you would want your AD to jump on the chance to join. Otherwise Tech fans will go down as the dumbest of all-time imho.
Is that your way of admitting that even using your list its definitive that the SEC has been the best ?that's fine.
UT is probably the only member that wouldnt benefit one way or another. Even OU would still benefit financially. Tech would benefit in all the ways I listed above.If you have a clear path to the le game through your conference, why would you want to make it tougher on yourself by moving to a tougher conference?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
