Reply With Quote
Bernays is a traitor for selling WW I under admitted propaganda.
Tons in the Bush Administration. Tons in the Obama Administration. That made sure that no one in the Bush Administration would ever face charges.
Bernays is a traitor for selling WW I under admitted propaganda.
Wilson Admin officials were complicit. Probably right up to Woodrow himself.
This is crazy talk. The capitol police exist to protect congress so the only explanation for why they didn't defend the naval yard is that it was a conspiracy. Wake up and connect the dots!
Can we get some indictments here?
I still fuggin like your style, snake. You always tickle my funny bone.
Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terry Gainer said that while the department's primary responsibility was to protect
the Capitol complex, which houses the US Congress, that mission did not allow it
to turn a "blind eye" when asked for help."It's a very serious allegation and inference to indicate that we were on scene
and could have helped and were told to leave," he said. "It crushes me if that's
the case."
So you named four people.
What charges are you calling for Jaco and Roc e?
Already told you. You weren't smart enough to pick it out of the quoted post.
So upon what precedent or statute are you proposing this prosecution you refuse to describe?
What crime is a traitor guilty of, Chump?
18 U.S.C. § 2381
18 U.S.C. § 2384
18 U.S.C. § 2388
OK, so how did the actions of each person you named, and all the others you didn't, meet the conditions of those statutes?
You have to be specific for each one. These are serious charges you are making.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 09-21-2013 at 07:16 PM.
Members of the media have been convicted for false statements affecting our armed forces before. Dont take my word for it though.
192 F.2d 338
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
IVA IKUKO TOGURI D’AQUINO
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 12383.
Oct. 10, 1951.
After having been employed in various jobs in 1942 and in the early part of 1943, appellant sought employment at Radio Tokyo and began her work as a typist for the Broadcasting Corporation of Japan in the fall of 1943. Shortly thereafter she began her broadcast work for this corporation which was under the control of the Japanese Government. There is evidence in the record that when the appellant took her voice test and accepted employment as an announcer and broadcaster for Radio Tokyo she knew that her work was to be concerned with a program known as “Zero Hour” which was to be beamed and directed specially to Allied soldiers in the Pacific. She was told and understood that the program would consist of music and entertainment designed to procure a listening audience among Allied soldiers, and that there was to be interspersed news and commentaries containing propaganda which was to be used as an instrument of psychological warfare. Their object was to cause the Allied troops to become homesick, tired and disgusted with the war.
That has no relevance here. Stick to the cases you are currently failing to make.
Bull . You don't have much imagination. Good attorneys do. I could use this precedent to prosecute a case.
How, counselor?
Successfully frame those interests pushing our nation to war (you would insist that these are imaginary, but the video above shows at least some members of the media to be complicit) as "enemies" of the United States, using propaganda to influence our foreign policy, place our troops in harms way, drain our resources, and otherwise and expose us to greater risk at the hands of extremists. In other words, the enemy using psychological propaganda via the media to instigate us into unnecessary conflict, thus waging war on our military, our coffers, and our national security.
Again, go ahead and show how each violated each code you listed.
You already missed the mark with with the instigate into unnecessary conflict. That had nothing to do with anything Tokyo Rose did.
Some precedent.
Do they use propaganda to achieve gun control aims? You bet your ass.
lol disappearing nose a closer look
Enemies use different tactics to bring America down. You can attack it overtly or covertly. Tokyo Rose used psychological to attack our forces covertly, thus placing them in increased danger. If someone uses psychological warfare (as Tokyo Rose DID DO and CNN did) via false news reports (as Tokyo Rose DID DO and CNN did as well) to effectively place our troops at an increased danger level (as Tokyo Rose DID DO and CNN did as well) and CAUSE HARM TO OUR NATION (as Tokyo Rose was convicted of doing and CNN definitely did) by inciting war (CNN DID DO, Tokyo Rose was acting during wartime)....wtf else do you need to hear?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
