Damn strait.
If someone assaults me when I'm armed, they are dead. Period. No second thought. Not knowing their intent, it is them or me!
Now that we have that out of the way...........
Chump if you were on the ground getting your head bashed in and you were armedhow would you respond?
Damn strait.
If someone assaults me when I'm armed, they are dead. Period. No second thought. Not knowing their intent, it is them or me!
I would've followed procedure and not stalked the kid.
I specifically mentioned children in the hypothetical. Your bad.
Not in my hypothetical. Your bad.Simple assault.............LOL. In this situation it could only be considered simple assault because Zimmerman ended the attack. Had Zimmerman not been armed to defend himself he could have been beaten to death or suffered serious head injuries, then we are looking at murder or aggravated assault for Martin.
You already answered. Your bad.I can't answer your question specifically because it was a stupid question, not all assaults are the same. Each victim will respond differently depending on how threatened they feel. If they are armed and feel they need to use it to protect their life, more power to them.
Not everyone curls up in a ball like you when being assaulted.
I wouldn't get myself in that situation like Zimmerman did. He's an idiot. I am not.
So you would have done that in school to the kids who bullied you so mercilessly?
Just kill them all?
I wouldn't have followed him either. Again, George was a head.
School? Kids you know? Compared to a stranger with unknown intent?
Chumpy... Your stupidity is showing again.
Does that apple taste like an orange?
Well you should qualify your statement then.I'll give you a chance to amend your "kill 'em all" doctrine.
It isn't a "kill 'em all" doctrine, you head.
Can you stick with the facts of what is said, or do you always have to change the meaning?
"them" implies "all".
Them's the facts.
Is TSA a member of the UAS? UAS! UAS! UAS!
Called it.
I told you your hypothetical didn't apply and to stop reaching, seems you are the only one discussing your hypothetical.I specifically mentioned children in the hypothetical. Your bad.
Again, try sticking to they topic being discussed which is Martin/Zimmerman.Not in my hypothetical. Your bad.
I did answer, and my stance hasn't changed.You already answered. Your bad.
Awwwww now look who doesn't want to play the hypothetical game.I wouldn't get myself in that situation like Zimmerman did. He's an idiot. I am not.
Let's make this easy Chump, did Zimmerman deserve to be assaulted?
lets make this easy, what would you do if an unknown thug following you brandishing a gun indicated to you he was trained on you and got close enough for you to find an opening?
I personally would bash his head against a sidewalk!
POINT:
You don't know what went down. You think you know because one of the individuals involved was a young black male. Zimmerman may have flashed his piece at the kid at some point, you don't know that this did not occur.
So just stop it with the stupidity.
@ a young black kid involved being my reason for supporting self defense.
I'll touch in your other points later. That was funny.
Bull .
You don't know what went down before or during the scuffle, beat down, whatever...
You don't know.
So what would you do?
Just go along?
Wait, she divorced you. Might as well start pretending that I know exactly what your relationship was with your wife. You and TSA apparently know what happened between Martin and Zimmerman, I mean since you were there and all...
Lol @ "long". If one has to exaggerate, he already lost.
Not get out of the Fkn car with a gun.
Like he was told to do by 911.
Neither do you. All we have is the evidence presented in court. I believe Zimmerman is a piece of who should have stayed in his truck. I also believe Martin took Zimmerman by surprise and assaulted him. Don't assault armed people, don't get shot.
So you believe Martin took Zimmerman by surprise and beat him up. Therefore Martin should die.
I believe I really don't know what happened. I wish no one would have died.
About sums it up...
I believe Martin should not have assaulted Zimmerman, therefore anything happening after that point is on him.
No one really knows as it was just the two of them. I believe one was a dumbass wannabe cop, and the other assaulted the wrong guy. If there were any evidence proving otherwise I'd change my tune.I believe I really don't know what happened. I wish no one would have died.
About sums it up...
Maybe. Who knows?
"Martin should not have assaulted Zimmerman"
How do you know that Z didn't strike first?
How do you know TM didn't say something like "get off my back, you greasebag ****** beyotch" and Z hit him?
My God.
"We don't need you to do that" is not saying "don't do that"
You are a ing idiot, or a ing liar.
Which is it?
Also, he called the "non emergency" number. Not 911.
Do you know anything factual about the case?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)