Reply With Quote
Very relevant! I think i will add you to the list! Another stupid comment by you! You should stop trying to act like a tough guy in purpose to hide your stupidity!
Should've fouled James. He would've missed at least one. Oh well...14 days till the first pre-season game. I'm ing pumped!!!
Very relevant! I think i will add you to the list! Another stupid comment by you! You should stop trying to act like a tough guy in purpose to hide your stupidity!
I'm not acting like a tough guy just pointing out that you're a massive, whiny pussy who doesn't have his priorities in life in order. lol crybaby , it'd almost be worth it to see the Spurs fail next season if it led to you offing yourself
I believe Chump would really and sincerely like to know, "are you dead yet"?
Chump, Chump, Chump... is Chump is your life? are You eager to suck him? It sound like it!!!I believe Chump would really and sincerely like to know, "are you dead yet"?
You're the one who seems to like sucking, you talk about it so much.
Seriously? The point of this thread was to see whether should we, or should we not foul up 3 with 10secs to go. This has nth to do with Game 6, or whatever. Cant we just talk about basketball, without bringing in who caused us to lose the game etc? I brought up some points, to contradict the popular belief that we should foul, and all I asked for was arguments against my points. I guess ST has basically turned into a forum for pop and manu haters to fight with pop and manu supporters? It used to be lakers fans against spurs fans below, but now its like we have been split into catholics and protestants.
I, for one, enjoyed reading the posts on both sides of this issue.
Great points have been made so far.
I am sorry that the thread has to suffer the pollution from the "hate" BS trolls.
I feel partly responsible for feeling compelled to criticize their adverse activity.
For that you have my apology.
However, I seriously doubt anything you, or I, or anyone else does, will stop them.
You are the one who was ruin your own thread, calling me troll for no reason after I made legitimate comment to prove you wrong!
Speak of the devil.
I could have predicted the above post.
What!!Speak of the devil.
I could have predicted the above post.
tell me again, what does legitimate comment mean? same way, i called you a troll without explaining. Just following what you did.
My argument was that you must foul in that situation cause you can look at this anyway you want but The Percents will be by far in favor of should foul if you want to make the right decision... You can try to think on some slim scenarios of what will happened if we do foul, like you did, but it's just pathetic to think that because of those not to foul is the right decision.
tell me again, what does legitimate comment mean? same way, i called you a troll without explaining. Just following what you did.
the % have been favoring just defending instead of fouling. There's already a stat in my original post. Thus, you have NO argument and I should stop feeding the trolls.
I don't sure about your % stuff but the common-sense and logic are clearly in faver of should foul if you want to secure the win in that situation...
Game 6, 5.6 secs on the clock. Heat just scored 3 pt on Allen shot. Spurs immediately inbound the ball and are near half court in less than 1.5 sec. BUT an official who I will not name, stops play to review the 3 pt shot that was obviously behind the line. Before his whistle, the Heat were running back to try to stop the quick advancement of the ball. They are not set in a defensive position. With the FREE timeout, the Heat are allowed to set their Defense. Pop is livid about the call. Without the help, the Heat are open to an easy score by the Spurs. The game changer was not the 3 pt make, but the clock stopage by an official, who could have rotated his finger for review at the next clock stop.
I was surprised by Duncan on the bench like everyone else, but a Bosh 2 pt does not tie. Only the 3 ties. Pop wanted everyone to stay on their man even after the shot. Seems like someone forget about Allen and it wasnt Green.
Common sense and logic also tells me you are a re ed 5 year old.
See? Does that convince you? No?
On that shot, even though TP went to put his hands up, I was really hoping Leonard could at least jumped and tried. He jumps so high and is so long he could have just blocked off Allen's vision or whatever and maybe altered it a little. Note: I AM NOT BLAMING KL HERE. Just saying, he could have done that thats all.
If you really think that you are right here about not to foul, then I really don't want to discuss with a re ate human being without common sense...
Agree, other than the fact that you can still lose up 3 and playing defense. It's possible to foul when playing defense (particularly if Gary Neal is closing out on shooters! Not that he was in the game then)
kobyz continuing to act like a re in the face of numbers proving him wrong? sounds familiar...
Tell us again how Tolliver is a better defender, shooter, and finisher than Bonner despite the numbers proving you dead wrong.
I could use the laughs.
I don't want to return to the bonner-tolliver argument, you can search it yourself if you want to remember, all I will say now is that you keep being superficial thinking numbers in basketball is the all story(what about what the eyes see and personal judgment and interpretation?), and also you keep being a liar take things out of context, that argument was about amnesty your beloved bonner, that spurs could be better bringing tolliver instead after amnesty your beloved bonner cause it also will be good financial wise, will have gave the team better cap situation to work with, and also for the reason that tolliver could not be worst than your beloved bonner who is nothing come playoff time, can't play and worthless...
Last edited by kobyz; 09-29-2013 at 07:51 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
