Is there a Bible/ New Testament expert in the house?

[The Reckoning]

i do find it interesting that there are no roman records, although the romans were very scrupulous record keepers, of Jesus. however, there are several of his pals. very very interesting.

[The Reckoning]

You may hate the Bible trumpeters and not believe in a God it's your right, but keep in mind many Scientists and well respected Historians over the years admit the Bible is an still a credible source of records from the past.

yes it is, and there have been many instances, particularly from the old testament that verify historical accuracies. it's an awesome do ent. the greatest book ever written and has shaped the very foundation of western society. however, sometimes it's better to take things as they're worth and not make connections that have yet to be proven.

[Blake]

you lost me at Blake

Saved yourself the trouble of getting lost later.

[mouse]

however, sometimes it's better to take things as they're worth and not make connections that have yet to be proven.

Like the Science books do today?

[The Reckoning]

I humble myself to the point that I'm doing God's will and not my own...and that's to spread the Gospel...and let me tell you it has been more fulfilling than the life of sin I was living before

that's awesome and i'm happy you lead a life that makes you happy without doing harm to yourself and others.


the basic rule of interpretation is you need to know your cons uents. the bible is a source of data that is meant to be interpreted and reinterpreted. yet its interpretation is only valuable to those who are looking for it. self exaltation on the internet is wasting time that some in here could be using on leading by example in person.

[mouse]

Saved yourself the trouble of getting lost later.

Translation: I have yet to win a debate with mouse so I would toss in the towel now if I was you.

[Blake]

/thread


and yes Jesus still says OP is a got

Jesus wants to come inside you.

[Skull-1]

because the 'correct' point of the parable is only correct in how you interpret it? you're exalting yourself by believing that only you have a connection to the word because you're so righteous. get over your holier than thou at ude, and maybe people will take you seriously.

I am not the only one who knows the meaning (indeed I did not even myself claim to have it--you presumed it). I will state with certainty, however, that the meaning is veiled. That your implied definition of self-exaltation IS flawed, however, shows you don't know the meaning at all.

[ismael-robert]

You did see my extra-biblical evidence above too right

[Skull-1]

Translation: I have yet to win a debate with mouse so I would toss in the towel now if I was you.

Has flake ever won a debate? My sources say no.

[Blake]

Has he ever won a debate? My sources say no.

lol sources.

Did SBM send you a "hey bro" private message?

[mouse]

Jesus wants to come inside you.

You see why I learned years ago to refuse myself to lower the IQ bar when trying to debating Blake.

I would hope many would do the same but I can see from the numerous pages of this topic many of you share the same IQ as him so its business as usual here in the Club.

[Skull-1]

yes it is, and there have been many instances, particularly from the old testament that verify historical accuracies. it's an awesome do ent. the greatest book ever written and has shaped the very foundation of western society. however, sometimes it's better to take things as they're worth and not make connections that have yet to be proven.

Let us look back at a small town of 300 people 2000 years hence and see how much of the record exists.

Not exactly show stopping.

[Skull-1]

You see why I learned years ago to refuse myself to lower the IQ bar when trying to debating Blake.

I would hope many would do the same but I can see from the pages many share the same IQ

. Associating fake with a debate compliments the little turd far too much. He doesn't debate. He sh-ts out his mouth.

[The Reckoning]

You did see my extra-biblical evidence above too right

yes and they all occurred after Jesus supposedly died. i'm looking for primary data during his lifetime. these guys were playing the telephone game back then - they wrote down whatever news they heard years after the fact.


anyway, im done here. Blake is starting with his sexual innuendos again.

[Blake]

Fuzzynuts and Flake are moronic bags. They don't desire the truth and I don't desire to waste my time on them.

how Christ like of you.

All with a sincere desire to learn shall find me patient and kind. The rest will get the sword. I have an accurate Bullsh-t detector which is why lumpyfuzznuts and flake got skewered quickly. I persisted longer than I should for the sake of those reading. Perhaps someone will be led to truth by my persistence.

Those with ears let them hear.

All anyone hears is butthurt and name calling.

What a spiritual weakling you are. I guarantee nobody finds you to be a credible Christian.

[mouse]

Has flake ever won a debate? My sources say no.

What do you consider a winner?

The person with the most meth who just happens to stay up late enough to be the last person to reply to a topic hes in , or the first person who finally realizes hes wasting his valuable time and research replying to an immature person online?

[mouse]

. Associating fake with a debate compliments the little turd far too much. He doesn't debate. He sh-ts out his mouth.

True.

But if hes still replying, and your still responding, then that makes him an active participant in the debate.

[Blake]

anyway, im done here. Blake is starting with his sexual innuendos again.

Oh, should I have waited for you to call me a got for a third time?

keep quoting the word of Jesus, young Christian.

[mouse]

anyway, im done here. Blake is starting with his sexual innuendos again.

I look forward to reading your replies when you do return.

[mouse]

Oh, should I have waited for you to call me a got for a third time?

keep quoting the word of Jesus, young Christian.

If this is True then BLAKE does have a point calling someone a " got" during a debate really downgrades your credibility.

Sorry I have to agree with Blake on this point.

[Blake]

Again not as technical as skull but here's some quick info...especially show that writings have been found less than 3 centuries separated:IS THE BIBLE RELIABLE?- Superior to any other Ancient Writing
The Bible is a historical do ent. Interestingly enough, if you subject it to the same tests that you subject other historical do ents to, you’ll discover that the Bible proves itself to be far superior to any other ancient writing.

Well no, it's not reliable.

See: op.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Let us look back at a small town of 300 people 2000 years hence and see how much of the record exists.

Not exactly show stopping.

How about you look to the Roman seat of power in the region where a guy trashed the bankers kiosk at the religious center, the roman governor got involved because the bankers were pissed and executed the guy..

[mouse]

Well no, it's not reliable.

See: op.

Blake is actually making points.

Is this really due to some powerful weed and Rolling Rock beer or is it public knowledge? (remember the www and it's postings will be the Bible of 2116

and many posters will scoff at it.

[xmas1997]

What do you consider a winner?
The person with the most meth who just happens to stay up late enough to be the last person to reply to a topic hes in , or the first person who finally realizes hes wasting his valuable time and research replying to an immature person online?

Is this really due to some powerful weed and Rolling Rock beer or is it public knowledge? (remember the www and it's postings will be the Bible of 2116
and many posters will scoff at it.