Rockets: Dwight highlights

[N0 LyF3 ScRuB]

Wrong about whose troll MJ is
Cam Newton
"LeBron = T-Mac"
"Green and Diaw for Shumpert"

Chargers, clippers, nuff said

[Clipper Nation]

Chargers, clippers, nuff said

Your ty takes.... nuff said

[Koolaid_Man]

• Since 2005, Howard's teams have consistently outplayed the opposition with Howard on the court, usually by a significant margin. Beginning in 2007-08, his plus/minus numbers on the season, per NBA.com/stats, were +5.9, +7.0, +7.5 and +6.4. These are rare numbers. The Lakers and Howard had horrible 2012-13 seasons, but the team was +1.8 with Howard on the court.
• Howard joined the league out of high school, can't hit free throws worth a darn andhas one of the most criticized offensive games in the league. Yet, the lowest true shooting percentage of his career was 56.5 percent -- and he has often been much better than that, including an entire season at an incredible 63 percent. For fun and comparison, the player with the most polished offensive game -- Kobe Bryant -- has only surpassed 56.5 percent in three of his 17 seasons. Howard has a career playoff true shooting percentage of 62 percent.

Dumbass got

when Dwight wins a game in Houston then holla at me

[ambchang]

When adjusted for pace his advanced metrics scores were less than MVPau in fact, a case can be made that Dwight is not a top 5 center. His winshareper48minwithPERtrueshooting% is pathetic.

But dude. You are comparing him to the best player on a two time championship winning team. We all know 2>0.

[RsxPiimp]

if he's the best player, why is he 0-16 without kobe and 0-4 with DPOY Dwight and 2 time mvp nash?

[TheMACHINE]

19 points? Xavier Henry thinks only scrubs do 19 points.

[Captivus]

7/11 FTs....not bad...

[Killakobe81]

When adjusted for pace his advanced metrics scores were less than MVPau in fact, a case can be made that Dwight is not a top 5 center. His winshareper48minwithPERtrueshooting% is pathetic.

I was making fun of the stat nerds, I wasn't making fun of Dwight ... Stern veto made me.salty didn't want Dwight back at max ...heck not sure I would want any player except LeBron and Durant at a max deal in the new CBA. That includes Kobe post Achilles.

[Killakobe81]

7/11 FTs....not bad...

Won't last but he looked good last night.

[Captivus]

Won't last but he looked good last night.

You are probably right.
Im still saying granny style is the way to go for him.

[Leetonidas]

scrub getting shat on again, per par etc get back upstairs dumb

[ambchang]

if he's the best player, why is he 0-16 without kobe and 0-4 with DPOY Dwight and 2 time mvp nash?

Best players can't lose games in the playoffs?

And D12 won the DPoY last year? Really, I swear it was Marc Gasol.

And Nash won TWO MVPs last year? How is that possible? Do you include Finals MVP as well? Because those two MVPs were won by the Kang last year.

[Leetonidas]

Not surprised Lakerfan doesn't like advanced statistics since they don't favor Kobe the only stat that matters is PPG tbh...who cares about usage, MPG, TS%, efficiency, +/-, etc. PPG > all

[RsxPiimp]

Best players can't lose games in the playoffs?

And D12 won the DPoY last year? Really, I swear it was Marc Gasol.

And Nash won TWO MVPs last year? How is that possible? Do you include Finals MVP as well? Because those two MVPs were won by the Kang last year.

Best players don't go 0-16 in their playoff careers dumbass

[Clipper Nation]

Best players don't go 0-16 in their playoff careers dumbass

If MVPau sucks so bad, why did Kirby need to ride on his coattails to get any post-Shaq role-player rings?

[Leetonidas]

Best players can't lose games in the playoffs?

And D12 won the DPoY last year? Really, I swear it was Marc Gasol.

And Nash won TWO MVPs last year? How is that possible? Do you include Finals MVP as well? Because those two MVPs were won by the Kang last year.

Honestly if the Lakers last season had a healthy 2009ish Dwight with 2005 Steve Nash along with current Gasol they'd have probably made it to the WCF. at Lakerfans trying to prop Kobe up by ting on Gasol. One can easily say why was Kobe without a series win and missing the playoffs before Gasol came to town? At least Kobe had Odom and a young Bynum, Gasol's best teammates in Memphis were who? Stromile Swift? Washed up Bonzi Wells? Mike Miller? Old Bobby Jackson? Lorenzen Wright? Hakim Warrick? Chucky Atkins?

Gasol's teams in Memphis were , and he went up against superior teams in each season they were swept (Spurs in 2004 with GOAT PF Timmy, Suns in 2005 during Nash's MVP year when the Suns were a legit le threat, and the Dallas Mavericks in 2006 with 2nd GOAT PF Dirk Nowitzki who made it to the Finals and should have won the le) and the teams that beat them each had a player who was an MVP winner with a cast around them that was better at every facet than Gasol's cast. Meanwhile, the great Kobe Bryant, who some delusional Lakerfans think is equal or better than MJ, misses the playoffs completely in 2005 with a similarly ty cast (although Kobe is supposed to be an all-time great and Odom was better than any player Gasol played with), choked after being up 3-1 in 2006 and quit in Game 7, and got eviscerated to the tune of 4-1 in the first round of 2007. So Kobe is 4-8 in the playoffs without Daddy/Gasol and he missed them entirely one year in his prime. At the same time, Gasol is leading his fest to the playoffs year in and year out except for the year he missed 23 games to injury.

In short, Gasol carried KobePERIOD.

[ambchang]

Best players don't go 0-16 in their playoff careers dumbass

So a team went 0-16 in the playoffs. According to you, all their players are exactly the same, because they have no best player.

In other words, only a team of clones can go 0-16 in the playoffs, which has already proven not to be the case.

Wonder who the dumbass is.

Better yet, according to your logic, it is BETTER to miss the playoffs than to make it and be swept.

[AchillesHeel]

So a team went 0-16 in the playoffs. According to you, all their players are exactly the same, because they have no best player.

In other words, only a team of clones can go 0-16 in the playoffs, which has already proven not to be the case.

Wonder who the dumbass is.

Better yet, according to your logic, it is BETTER to miss the playoffs than to make it and be swept.

It actually is in terms of long term success. If your team's best years are making the playoffs and getting swept, it's time to blow it all up and re-build through the draft, which is exactly what the Grizzlies did after trading Gasol, they were a WCF team last season.

[ambchang]

It actually is in terms of long term success. If your team's best years are making the playoffs and getting swept, it's time to blow it all up and re-build through the draft, which is exactly what the Grizzlies did after trading Gasol, they were a WCF team last season.

Of course a team that goes 0-16, or 0-12 or whatever should be blown up because it has proven to be non-compe ive against elite teams, and too good to win the lottery. But there is still a best player.