Anyone?
Jesus did exist, so does David Blaine. They are both decent magicians, but I'd give the edge to Blaine.
Who is arguing that position? Are you so ing deluded, stubborn, and plainly stupid to not grasp that not a single person has claimed that jesus didn't exist at all outright? This from the dumb that keeps whining aboutwhen did I say I was a christian
![]()
It's also been seen in various animal populations, such as female mice missing the FucM gene being attracted to other female mice and exhibiting masculine sexual behavior, tbh.... that suggests that Jeebo s' re ed take that sexuality is a sin that evil humans made up and chose is indeed re ed....
Okay then. So I was right all along, I am not arguing that Jesus was or wasn't a miracle worker or son of God. I am simply stating that a man named Jesus did exist in ancient times.
It's too bad that all those trolls belong to Mouse instead of someone who's actually funny, because they do have potential, tbh....
1. Re ed opinions/point of view
2. Posts laden with logical fallacies
3. Consistently responds with ad hominem
4. Ignores people who are ting on him
5. Parroting the same thing over and over without acknowledging that no one is arguing that point
6. Thinks sexuality is something you can just wake up an choose to do
7. Sources wikipedia and the Bible
8. Makes claims about the majority of long dead "scholars" believing something making it true yet refusing to acknowledge modern science's consensus that the bible is full of and doesn't understand how this is the same logic he is using to support his "faith"
9. Openly admitted already that he has no real evidence and that it's just "faith"
10. Sucked off Koolaid man and applauded him for his "truth bombs"
massive got confirmed
point of the op
You're slow
Not necessarily.
We only know that God does not approve of the ACT of sexuality, not the sexuals themselves.
There is written evidence already spoken of above.
There is archeological evidence in such things as the Shroud of Turin etc.
"so jesus existed so i am right! take that idiots even though no one said jesus didn't exist! im right all along!
"
Virtually all modern scholars ofantiquity agree that Jesus existed, and most biblicalscholars and classical historians see the theories of his non-existenceas effectively refuted.[1][3][4][9][10][11] In antiquity, the existence of Jesuswas never denied by those who opposed Christianity.[28][29] Robert E. Van Voorst states that the idea of thenon-historicity of the existence of Jesus has always been controversial, andhas consistently failed to convince virtually all scholars of many disciplines.[9] There is, however, widespreaddisagreement among scholars on the details of the life of Jesus mentioned inthe gospel narratives, and on the meaning of his teachings.[5]
![]()
i think i'll start calling myself a biblical scholar.
Religites can't even agree on the validity of religion at all
Here we have this smelly bean3r making all kinds of stupid claims and supporting his claims with bible verses and claiming victory when no one disputed jesus' existence to begin with
Then we have xmas, a religious person who accepts that the Bible is not infallable and acknowledges that sexuality is most likely a result of gene mutation
Then we have Skull, a zealot who would say both of these guys are completely stupid and their understanding of their religion is completely wrong and twisted
ST makes me laugh![]()
i've determined that kony is a biblical scholar.
Still trying to claim victory regarding the existence of Jesus when it has been stated like a million ing times that no one here is arguing that except the scholar who will be holding a press conference on the 19th?
I'm just waiting for the "I was trolling you guise all along!" admission of complete failure
so according to the gots in the club, people are born gay, god doesn't exist, and banging another mans wife is ok? you all are some sick s.
Joe Chalupa, imo. Same difference I guess.
Not according to Leetonidas and RandomGuy, who I was mostly replying to in all of my comments
it's true that in academia "biblical scholars" are a dime a dozen and hardly anyone takes them seriously. usually they're extremely biased christians, radical atheists or plain nutcases.
and lol at over 70 people viewing this thread.
for example that one "biblical scholar" yall claimed to have found atlantis
i GUARANTEED that you would never hear of it again because that guy was full of . usually they are if they go to the popular media first before publishing in peer-reviewed journals.
but nooooooo0o0o0o you faygos wouldn't believe the Reck.
To be fair, I don't think it's a mutation per se, I think it's just a genetic trait, no different from hair color, eye color, skin color, etc. that depends on the expression of genes during development....
Yet you spend all of your time arguing with them on ST? ing loser. Your life must really be sad and pathetic.
Why does thinking someone is born make them a sick
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)