Reply With Quote
The Bible itself says the Bible is error free.
The men that left out the apocrypha and other scrolls would probably tell you they were divinely inspired to do so.....much like Joseph Smith would tell you his brand new add on was a divine gift.
so you're just noting the ridicule without feeling ridiculed. Ok noted.
The Bible itself says the Bible is error free.
The men that left out the apocrypha and other scrolls would probably tell you they were divinely inspired to do so.....much like Joseph Smith would tell you his brand new add on was a divine gift.
It's an error because crimson is not purple. It's pretty simple.
You're crazy.
Thank you, yes.
I noted and commented on it but was not fazed by it.
On the contrary, I found it amusing.
I love humor, but ridicule is rather childish, and only mildly funny because of the fool it makes of the one doing the ridiculing. And most of the time the one doing it does not even realize how foolish they are making themselves look in a feeble attempt to make someone else look foolish.
Who, and where does it ever say it is error free? OT? NT?
I am just right. Label it what you will, dork wad.
Well you're stupid, because I have already shown from multiple angles how it is.... Obviously not simple enough for a simpleton like you.
Last edited by Skull-1; 10-13-2013 at 08:13 PM.
Just right about what?
You being a loser.
Why so salty?
Salty enough to make dorkwad two words.
As long as you didn't say you were just right about the Jesus, that's cool.
Not just. But, yes. I am.
Salty as Morton.
And what makes you right about that?
The scriptures.
Which ones?
Written by whom?
Which translation?
Approved by which scripture committee meeting?
Now it's appropriate!
I'm just glad God has such wide ranging sense of humor!
He would be awfully boring if He didn't, and the same goes for the Bible.
I just regret it is not complete enough to tell the whole story and had to have so many veils. But then IMHO all of the Truth is veiled in real life as well.
I wonder sometimes why is real truth that way, why is it veiled?
this thread
Every once in a while we get one of those 'god of the gaps' dudes
words in Bold are not really needed when debating a subject online.
There are some on here who cannot accept the idea that others have arrived at parts of the truth as they see it simply because to them it defies reason and rationality.
That in and of itself does not make it a false truth just because someone cannot accept it.
Plus we've been discussing opinions for the most part which are different than facts in that opinions in nature are not subject to empirical method.
However, even when the holes in someone's argument which is based upon opinions are pointed out, they resort to ridicule and insults because they have no other recourse, and they do not have the confidence in their own point of view in order to discuss it in a rational and mature manner.
No one is here trying to change anyone's point of view or opinion except for a few self appointed individuals who for whatever reason feel bound to do so.
The pity is that when they find something that they can not accept, they then resort to ridicule hoping to draw them into pissing contests rather than a decent discussion, thus sidetracking the issue. But all they accomplish by the use of that tactic is to bring about how foolish and childish they are. Their attempts to insult end up backfiring on themselves instead of giving them the satisfaction of making their target look like fools.
Thus they gain nothing from the discussion.
That is a shame, because all could expand their minds if they did not approach it with minds that were closed and narrow.
It is what it is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
