Andrew Luck
Robert Griffin III
people actually defend JaWalrus?
![]()
So many great takes from Team Black in this thread...
it only took one year for this question to be proven rhetorical
in idiots. I like rg3 but there's no question now.
Team Black avoiding this thread bump like the plague
RG3 won rookie of the year. Division Championship. Round 1, RG3.
This season ain't over. Round 2, TBD.
if by some divine miracle Luck was black and RG3 was white (but they played the same way) they'd have chosen Luck.racists
Luck turned around the 2-14 colts into an 11-5 team and didn't exactly have a run game to take pressure off, which is something pretty much all other young qb's have had when they are successful (Ryan with Turner, Flacco with Rice, Tannehill with Bush, Wilson with Lynch, etc. RG3 had Alfred Morris who was the NFL's second leading rusher. The Skins went from 5-11 to 10-6. Luck spearheaded a 9 game turnaround, RG3 was in charge of a 5 game turnaround.
Huh? Why would "team black" be scared of this thread? This thread was created last season and RG3 straight dominated Luck last season so I don't know why yall are bumping this thread. It only shows how wrong you guys were.
I would still start my franchise team with RG3 without a doubt.
he predictably dominated Luck in rushing yards and tore up his ACL as a result. Kudos
He had a better passer rating and less interceptions as well. He was all around better than Luck last season. There's a reason why he's rookie of the year over Luck. This season is still early so we'll see. Also Colts tanked that year with talent like Reggie Wayne but RG3 made a mediocre Redskins team relevent.
Option offense. One-read then take off and run. Easy to minimize interceptions. Luck didnt have the luxury of a 1400 yard rusher, so more picks are expected. Is Russell Wilson a better qb than luck too? Lol
He's great at throwing dumpoffs, slants, and screens...can't take that away from him. Much like his playoff performance, where he didn't complete a pass over 11 yards
Meanwhile, Luck torched Sherman and Browner, and the entire Legion of Boom enroute to victory.
Has Russell killed a wide open hall of famer receiver in the open field? Nuff said.![]()
I'm a fan of Russell Wilson. barking up the wrong tree. but he's no luck
Im glad he's no Luck or else he'd be breaking the knees of his wide receivers lol. Just terrible. Will the other receivers still put their knees onthe line for him or will the moral be the same?
and that's why people think you're re ed.
outta here. You're re ed to think other nfl teams wouldn't snatch up RG3 in heartbeat and start him if let go right now.
too bad that's not the discussion. the discussion is whether you'd rather have Luck or RG3. at this point that's a pretty obvious choice.
no ing on what you said, teams like the Jags would obviously rather have rg3 than gabbert. way to move the goalposts.
Obvious choice would be not to pick the one that would break your wide receiver's knees on an open play lol.
Goodnight folks!
Russell Wilson is better than either one of them.
Wilson is good but the Seahawks could win games if he got hurt. The Colts wouldn't survive without Luck. He's much more important to his team. I think Wilson is still a very good QB for his age and experience but Luck definitely better at playing QB.
Luck is a good one, but I like Wilson better. Wilson is clutch, he never gets rattled, and he seems to have a 6th sense for when he's about to get hit. The Seahawks would be no better than .500 without him. Luck will have a chance to show what he's made of now that Reggie Wayne went down.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)