There isn't much to do in La Villa but post gifs and wonder where the we come from, eh?![]()
There isn't much to do in La Villa but post gifs and wonder where the we come from, eh?![]()
Yes, but actually psychologists think their degree to be among the sciences.
You are correct about philosophy.
What about you?
Its a pretty boring town tbh.
The only pro-evolution evidence I need is to see the people who argue against it.
tbh do you ball?
Still in the Valley TE?
Play basketball? naw man, back in high school but not anymore
It's not, because psychology often does not meet the five basic requirements for a field to be considered scientifically rigorous: clearly defined terminology, quantifiability, highly controlled experimental conditions, reproducibility and, finally, predictability and testability.
Sure some online universities offer a BS in Psychology, from the UT website:
College of Liberal Arts
Department of Psychology
I'm familiar with science.
Do you base your discussions on philosophy, theology or science? Or do you try to hybrid them together and if so, to what end? Theology discounts all other studies that point away from God as the prime mover.
I usually go to the university on days like today to ball with them s, your welcome to come.
We all know you're a laude from MIT.
What is lost in all this is the fact some things "Evolve" look at a caterpillar into a butterfly or an egg into a chicken.
I many times make the mistake of labeling an Atheist with someone who supports Darwin and that isn't always the case.
You can separate yourself from Religion and the Bible and still not support Darwin, as you can Support the bible and believe Science.
The problem is your like a kid in a gym when both sides are picking teams. Maybe you don't even want to participate in the game.
Why must you choose? Maybe your just sitting back and evaluating the data.
But as the jury is still out on the final verdict of this debate I still refuse to accept a lie we our all from some random Universe that exploded from Nothing.
![]()
I might stop by one of these days, never been but sounds like fun. Any females or are you married?![]()
haha, from the ladies at pan am?![]()
kinda, not really. You'd be surprised at the amount of good looking females nowadays there. It's like the females of this half-generation graduated in looks down here.
I would never base anything on theology although I have studied much in the field due to my insatiable curiosity.
I base my theories primarily on physics, but I also know they are tinged to a certain extent by philosophy.
Creativity demands this I think, because I am also a musician so I tend to think outside the box. My studies of various faiths and many of their great books are a hobby.
But I believe there is a mathematical principal behind everything.
So you may be right in describing it as a hybrid. Yet I still tend to put everything to and through scientific methodology.
I grant you that my opinions on spirituality are quite unorthodox.
I don't think we ever stop learning, and that there is no telling where the next inspiration or discovery will come from. In fact, believe it or not the last time I had a light go off inside was right here on this forum a few days ago. Surprising to say the least.![]()
Last edited by xmas1997; 10-15-2013 at 06:29 PM.
I don't see scientific methodology in your responses. I see basically sbm.
SBM? That is a new term for me.
Society of Behavior Medicine?
Anyway, that is fine. Science is just another tool to use.
Last edited by xmas1997; 10-15-2013 at 06:41 PM.
As long as she is a she, and was always a she, and foxy as too, I'm ok with that.
But then again, I've probably had more than my share of hot horny groupies while gigging in my day.
I'm probably being a bit greedy wanting more.
Why is it something tells me you were not referring to that?![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)