Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 113
  1. #26
    Believe. KL2's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    2,451
    I have a hard time believing that, I think Marco can be an average defender in this system, wheras Neal had some of the worst defense I've ever seen. Not only was he a horrible defender but the dumb fouls he committed were out of control, the late charges, and 1's etc.

  2. #27
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    4,829
    I have a hard time believing that, I think Marco can be an average defender in this system, wheras Neal had some of the worst defense I've ever seen. Not only was he a horrible defender but the dumb fouls he committed were out of control, the late charges, and 1's etc.
    Good points.

  3. #28
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Defense wins champ's but if one has no defense then some improvement in offense over an equally bad D player is better than nothing...
    These players are mere images of one another right down to assists and turnovers. A healthy Neal is going to shoot a better % and play a smidge better defense. Belinelli might have a little more play making ability but regardless of how you slice it, they are one in the same. Belinelli isn't the upgrade people are making him out to be.

    I guess you could say the only real major difference is that while Neal was a liability at SG, Belinelli will be one at both the SG and backup SF positions. Like I said, he'd better kick it up a couple of notches this year if he's going to make any kind of impact.

  4. #29
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    4,829
    These players are mere images of one another right down to assists and turnovers. A healthy Neal is going to shoot a better % and play a smidge better defense. Belinelli might have a little more play making ability but regardless of how you slice it, they are one in the same. Belinelli isn't the upgrade people are making him out to be.

    I guess you could say the only real major difference is that while Neal was a liability at SG, Belinelli will be one at both the SG and backup SF positions. Like I said, he'd better kick it up a couple of notches this year if he's going to make any kind of impact.
    . As I feared. We are older. Didn't adjust. Didn't add anyone that improves us. Are going to suffer all season over Turnobili and his epic Game Six Rimjob.

  5. #30
    you're a phony Holden_Caulfield's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Post Count
    6,508
    come in handy

  6. #31
    Believe. Roger Freemason Jr.'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    1,635
    I saw a couple great contests against Dwayne Wades turn around jumpers on Friday night, they went in, but his hands were as close as they could get without fouling or falling on him. I don't think he's as bad as Neal defensively, no way, and also he's 2 inches taller and has a longer wing-span (I think).

  7. #32
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    I kept laughing when the Heat commentators thought Neal was our back up SF.

  8. #33
    Believe. Roger Freemason Jr.'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    1,635
    I kept laughing when the Heat commentators thought Neal was our back up SF.
    I heard that as well. It's like he wanted to correct himself, but just kept talking.

  9. #34
    Veteran barakz21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,442
    Neal IS the better, purer shooter. But BellyNelly's a lot more well rounded.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    These players are mere images of one another right down to assists and turnovers. A healthy Neal is going to shoot a better % and play a smidge better defense. Belinelli might have a little more play making ability but regardless of how you slice it, they are one in the same. Belinelli isn't the upgrade people are making him out to be.

    I guess you could say the only real major difference is that while Neal was a liability at SG, Belinelli will be one at both the SG and backup SF positions. Like I said, he'd better kick it up a couple of notches this year if he's going to make any kind of impact.
    I think he has got more defensive potential than Gary Neal because of his height. He can at least contest shots, instead of having players shoot over the top of him and not being able to do anything about it (like In Neal's case). He's also got much more potential on the offense side of the ball, as he has some play making ability. Gary Neal displayed almost zero play making ability. Having said all that, I agree that Marco will still have to prove it and take it up a notch on the court to reach that potential.

    btw do you have something against Marco? It sounds like you do with nearly every post of yours.

  11. #36
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    12,323
    These things don't happen over night. Beli has to learn the Spurs system. And that won't happen right away. To think that it will is very unrealistic. He played decent defense for the Bulls. Once he gets acclimated I'm pretty sure he will be a lot better than Neal was on defense, but it may take awhile to see this.
    People have already explained his offensive advantages to Neal.

  12. #37
    Veteran Maddog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    2,057
    I've always liked Beli when watching him play for other teams. that said, you tend not to notice a players fault as much.
    A couple of thoughts-
    And I guess it really comes down to a Neal comparisons
    1. Offensively- neal is a better shooter, but Beli overall is a better offensive player
    2. Defensively at this point is a wash, but beli can be a lot better. He seems a lot bigger than 6'5"
    also younger than Neal

  13. #38
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    Beli has only been with the team a few weeks and is still learning the system. If no0b-Belinelli is on the same level as Neal was after years in the system...I'll take it.

  14. #39
    The 6th is coming... will_spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,969
    I don't know Belinelli... just looking at the box score he had pretty much exactly the same numbers as Neal last year, except he needed a few more minutes to get them, and his scoring % aren't as good. Reading this thread it appears it's a wash, with maybe a bit more upside for Belinelli on the defensive end, but this will require quite a bit of time anyway and we might just never see it.

    Right now Neal is being paid $500k more than Belinelli (both have a 2-year contract).

    So... why did the FO replace a guy who knew the Spurs system by a similar player who doesn't just to save $500k per year over 2 years? Were they really so fed up with Neal that they thought they might as well sign his clone and hope for the best?

  15. #40
    Veteran barakz21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,442
    Beli has only been with the team a few weeks and is still learning the system. If no0b-Belinelli is on the same level as Neal was after years in the system...I'll take it.
    Thats the goods right there.

  16. #41
    Veteran barakz21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,442
    Beli at least TRIES on defense and puts up a challenge. More often than not, Neal would just watch when his man blows by him and won't attempt to recover

  17. #42
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    I don't know Belinelli... just looking at the box score he had pretty much exactly the same numbers as Neal last year, except he needed a few more minutes to get them, and his scoring % aren't as good. Reading this thread it appears it's a wash, with maybe a bit more upside for Belinelli on the defensive end, but this will require quite a bit of time anyway and we might just never see it.

    Right now Neal is being paid $500k more than Belinelli (both have a 2-year contract).

    So... why did the FO replace a guy who knew the Spurs system by a similar player who doesn't just to save $500k per year over 2 years? Were they really so fed up with Neal that they thought they might as well sign his clone and hope for the best?
    Beli is a much better all around player than Neal. Getting him to sign for less than what Neal got was a very shrewd move. His shooting percentages will improve in the Spurs system.

  18. #43
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    12,323
    Beli is a much better all around player than Neal. Getting him to sign for less than what Neal got was a very shrewd move. His shooting percentages will improve in the Spurs system.
    As will his defense.

  19. #44
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325
    Beli is a much better all around player than Neal. Getting him to sign for less than what Neal got was a very shrewd move. His shooting percentages will improve in the Spurs system.
    Metal brethren?

  20. #45
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    Barry looked lost when he got here, too.

  21. #46
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    12,323
    Barry looked lost when he got here, too.
    So did Horry, Finley, even Timmy looked that way at first. It just takes time to adjust to a new system, and especially one as complicated as the Spurs is.
    All the new coaching staff will have to adjust too.

  22. #47
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931

  23. #48
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325

  24. #49
    Veteran Raven's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    17,954
    delusional tbh

  25. #50
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    I don't know Belinelli... just looking at the box score he had pretty much exactly the same numbers as Neal last year, except he needed a few more minutes to get them, and his scoring % aren't as good. Reading this thread it appears it's a wash, with maybe a bit more upside for Belinelli on the defensive end, but this will require quite a bit of time anyway and we might just never see it.

    Right now Neal is being paid $500k more than Belinelli (both have a 2-year contract).

    So... why did the FO replace a guy who knew the Spurs system by a similar player who doesn't just to save $500k per year over 2 years? Were they really so fed up with Neal that they thought they might as well sign his clone and hope for the best?
    Belinelli has more potential than Neal to be a better all around player. Why is it so hard for people around here to understand that?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •