Reply With Quote
Shocked that spurstalk "men" eat quiche
You should probably finally come out of the closet, you might be less paranoid and stop seeing sexuality where it doesn't exist, tbh...
Shocked that spurstalk "men" eat quiche
Do you even know what quiche is or is that the only book you read since 1982?
I'll help you out SBM.
Good that you drew your own conclusions
I concluded you haven't read a book since 1982, and probably only read the cover.
I didn't draw it. It's a really old picture. Avante is the one that likes to draw.
Draw your own conclusions as to whether ^ any snitching went on ^
If this is truly the case, then my hope is that there can be some sort of openness and a lot less obsessive trolling, because the alternative is the gravitation to the abyss and thus a complete loss of credibility for the entire forum as a whole. When the pissing contests pervade and thus hijacking every single thread, it discourages people from coming here, much less posting an opinion. IMHO the ridicule and baseless accusations just because someone has a contrary opinion undermines the purpose of an informational forum.
Well it has been this way for years.
If someone complains - the chumpies and blakes will label it whining.
If someone fights back and returns insults - the chumpies and blakes - snitch you out and report you for "ruining" and " ting" on the forum.
If someone "trolls" in different ways than their "trolling" they will disapprove and snitch you out.
What did I leave out?
You left out your paranoid meltdowns when people agree that you're painfully unfunny and trying too hard, tbh....
Thanks,
another one -
when you point out hypocrisy - it is a "meltdown"
when they "meltdown" it is just "not serious"
When you want to have fair rules for all - "why take it so seriously - it's the godammn internet!"
When you return their insults - "you are ting on the forum - let's snitch him out and ban him - this is serious!"
^ Exhibit A of a typical SBM paranoid meltdown
^ deflecting truth bombs ^
On whom did I snitch, SBM?Well it has been this way for years.
If someone complains - the chumpies and blakes will label it whining.
If someone fights back and returns insults - the chumpies and blakes - snitch you out and report you for "ruining" and " ting" on the forum.
If someone "trolls" in different ways than their "trolling" they will disapprove and snitch you out.
What did I leave out?
^ disingenous deflection ^ of course he has absolutely nothing to do with anyone ever getting pinked or banned in this place ^
Avoiding the question.
Realizes his conspiracy theory is .
If you know he has something to do with it, then it shouldn't be hard to name names of who Chump has supposedly snitched on, tbh.... your continued deflections show that you're really just talking out of your ass per par and have to keep deflecting to maintain your schtick....
^ the confirmed snitch is calling for others to snitch on the snitch ^ that is rich ^
You've been trying to snitch on me for months -- but you never say who I got banned or pinked.
Must be because you fear my power.
^ snitch tap dancing ^
Either name names or admit that your "snitch" conspiracies are bull .... it's that simple....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
