Reply With Quote^ Still spreading his paranoid conspiracies but can't prove them ^
^ still angry that he was outed as a snitch and a snitch sympathizer^
^ Still spreading his paranoid conspiracies but can't prove them ^
^ outed himself as a tinfoil hat conspiracy nut
Wanted to discuss this in the Spurs Forum but since i cannot post there at present....
As you stated my opinion, because in being given the silent treatment as to banning i do not for a fact know.
I try to give people the benefit of the doubt as i would like done to me. I also have, well had no interest in "outing" a mul roll who does not wish to be outed. That having been said, after 8 years, it's gotten old. It's like the two or three year old that we cover our eyes and pretend we cannot "see" them. The child is thrilled and thrives on the attention. Even tho we can see them, he/she is thrilled they think we do not know where they are. When they reach 5 6 7 8 years old, this game gets old and they grow to want a more mature game. Spurtalk Mul roll/Multimod seems stuck in the 2-3 year old game and wants the attention.
That being said:
1. Posted a thread on "Helping, understanding our Mul rolls". Showed and linked an article on "juvenile narcissism" which sized up SpursTalk mul roll very accurately. Seemed to be not well taken by a multimoderator. The thread was locked after only a couple days. When i referenced this article years later, -boom banned.
1a. Commented on pic mouse posted by saying it was Paki, Chumpdumper in a lobster net dress (was actually ashbeeigh photoshopped), and another seemingly prominent ST Troll as a Glee character. Banned shortly thereafter. My posting was all in good fun, i did not mean any serious hurt to any of these if they are indeed Multimoderators, and i think some of them are.
I do not buy the fabrication for one second that it was my posting re Pop. I was very happy with his strategies in the 2nd half reg season and the playoffs until he gave away yet another Championship in Game 6. All kinds of other posters bashing Popped, rightly so.
and sadly, it could have been:
No, of course you had absolutely nothing to do with it.
The fact that FABBS destroyed you repeatedly had absolutely nothing to do with it either.
lol another poster states his belief of my power over him.
^ but of course - he believes - he is innocent - and everyone just has it out for him ^ amusing that he is too much of a coward to own this treacherous and cowardly behavior. ^ the fact that he works very hard to get others banned for the exact same thing that he has spent his life doing - is just the crowning achievement to this coward-troll ^
well chump can you get the ban hammer rolling again? i mean if i could get you banned I would and you can call me a snitch while you are looking at the invalid login screen.
So, in other words - you have done nothing worse than what other posters have done before - and after - but you were singled out and banned and not even given the respect of a reason why?
Sounds eerily familiar - and ty.
On top of that - the chumpie - connection - has validity. How shocking!
Who have I worked very hard to get banned?
Step up.
^ SBM does not snitch ^ hard for snitches to understand this ^
SBM has already snitched. Hard for him to understand. He thought he wasn't racist either.
ChumpDumper do you post on SpursTalk under any other profile name?
^chumpie deflection in 5,4,3....^
If you don't like your perception of things here, you can always just leave.
I stated a few days ago that I have not posted under another profile name for over four years, and none of those names had over 50 posts.
^boldface lie ^ no shame ^
what about prior to those 4 years?
^ lies and deflections in 5,4,3,...^
^ SBM added bald-faced lying to his list of crimes^ no shame ^
^lol no answer ^
SBM, what do you think my other screen names are?
Just post them and stop being an old gossipy woman.
Already answered.
^post the names^
^I asked you first.^ 20 times.^
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
