You should probably start betting against them every week if you want them to win, tbh....
After we spank the Panthers, and start getting people back who in the NFC can stop us? Keep in mind we are where we are without our 1 & 3 receiver and our best pass rusher.
You should probably start betting against them every week if you want them to win, tbh....
That coming from a guy who never steps out with any opinions at all...BEFORE...a game.
Ok little fella break down the Carolina vs Niner game for me, or can you?
While here...
Remember this name....Brenden Oliver. He's a tailback for Buffalo (school), just think of a faster more elusive Maurice Jones Drew. Oliver looks like a mini Hulk, muscles on muscles on muscles and has amazing quicks. One of those 5-8 205 types. A constant.......WOW!
Saints will beat the Niners in the dome next weekend.
They can't beat the Seahawks. Doesn't matter where the game is played.
They haven't won at SF in 5 years.
Carolina and SF are both hot right now--the Panthers D is only 2nd to the Chiefs (questionable opponents aside) and the 49ers are getting some players back on the D side so this one will be a good one. I see a close low scoring first half and a more explosive 2nd half. I am hoping the Newtons win but I think the 49ers win by 7.
That questionable opponents line was meant for both those teams I hope...
Predictions: SF by 17, Cam Newton does horrible (just can't trust him tbh). Peyton Hillis makes a suprise appearance at half time, runs a 4.3 out of nowhere, incidentally causing Avante to choke on his corn dog and asphyxiate himself to death.
They're due!
You can make the case for all the teams mentioned--each have played lousy offensive teams and I really thought your Bills should've won it against the Chefs. So it will be interesting to see who comes out on top this Sunday.
Wanna bet on that?
Peyton Hillis is the slowest back in all of football, high school kids could beat him.
Uh-oh, ring the alarms, tbh..
I do buy...commercials...curse. Look at all those guys who do commercials and what happens to them.
When was the last time the Niners lost both Seahawk games in a season...2007.
Avante, are you afraid of the Super Bowl curse, tbh?..
Let's look at reality....
Seattle isn't playing like they did and they've lost Rice for the season.
The Pack without Aaron Rodgers.
The Saints can't beat the Jets.
The Niners will be getting players back, and stand as good a shot at winning the NFC as anyone else. Once in the SB anything can happen.
History clearly states that the 49ers will not be returning to the SB this season. People can try and convince themselves all that they want that the 49ers will get back to the Super Bowl because of their talent. But the numbers don't lie. A Super Bowl loser hasn't been back to the Super Bowl the next season in 20 years. All of those Super Bowl losers were talented the next season, but still couldn't get back there. The 49ers will not be returning to the Super Bowl this season. Evidence below.
……………………………………………………
** How the Super Bowl losers have fared the following season:
2012 49ers: 11-4-1; lost to Ravens, 34-31, in Super Bowl XLVII
2013 49ers: ????
……………………………………………………
2011 Patriots: 13-3; lost to Giants, 21-17, in Super Bowl XLVI
2012 Patriots: 12-4; lost to Ravens, 28-13, in AFC Championship Game
……………………………………………………
2010 Steelers: 12-4; lost to Packers, 31-25, in Super Bowl XLV
2011 Steelers: 12-4; lost to Broncos, 29-23, in AFC wild-card playoffs
……………………………………………………
2009 Colts: 14-2; lost to Saints, 31-17, in Super Bowl XLIV
2010 Colts: 10-6; lost to Jets, 17-16, in AFC wild-card playoffs
……………………………………………………
2008 Cardinals: 9-7; lost to Steelers, 27-23, in Super Bowl XLIII
2009 Cardinals: 10-6; lost to Saints, 45-14, in NFC divisional playoffs
……………………………………………………
2007 Patriots: 16-0; lost to Giants, 17-14, in Super Bowl XLII
2008 Patriots: 11-5; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
2006 Bears: 13-3; lost to Colts, 29-17, in Super Bowl XLI
2007 Bears: 7-9; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
2005 Seahawks: 13-3; lost to Steelers, 21-10, in Super Bowl XL
2006 Seahawks: 9-7; lost to Bears, 27-24 in NFC divisional playoffs
……………………………………………………
2004 Eagles: 13-3; lost to Patriots, 24-21, in Super Bowl XXXIX
2005 Eagles: 6-10; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
2003 Panthers: 11-5; lost to Patriots, 32-29, in Super Bowl XXXVIII
2004 Panthers: 7-9; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
2002 Raiders: 11-5; lost to Buccaneers, 48-21, in Super Bowl XXXVII
2003 Raiders: 4-12; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
2001 Rams: 14-2; lost to Patriots, 20-17, in Super Bowl XXXVI
2002 Rams: 7-9; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
2000 Giants: 12-4; lost to Ravens, 34-7, in Super Bowl XXXV
2001 Giants: 7-9; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
1999 ans: 13-3; lost to Rams, 23-16, in Super Bowl XXXIV
2000 ans: 13-3; lost to Ravens, 24-10, in AFC divisional playoffs
……………………………………………………
1998 Falcons: 14-2; lost to Broncos, 34-19, in Super Bowl XXXIII
1999 Falcons: 5-11; missed playoffs
……………………………………………………
1997 Packers: 13-3; lost to Broncos, 31-24, in Super Bowl XXXII
1998 Packers: 11-5; lost to 49ers, 30-27, in NFC wild-card playoffs
……………………………………………………
1996 Patriots: 11-5; lost to Packers, 35-21, in Super Bowl XXXI
1997 Patriots: 10-6; lost to Steelers, 7-6, in AFC divisional playoffs
……………………………………………………
1995 Steelers: 11-5; lost to Cowboys, 27-17, in Super Bowl XXX
1996 Steelers: 10-6; lost to Patriots, 28-3, in AFC divisional playoffs
……………………………………………………
1994 Chargers: 11-5; lost to 49ers, 49-26, in Super Bowl XXIX
1995 Chargers: 9-7; lost to Colts, 35-20, in AFC wild-card playoffs
……………………………………………………
1993 Bills: 12-4; lost to Cowboys, 30-13, in Super Bowl XXVIII
1994 Bills: 7-9; missed playoffs
There are trends that make sense and those that don't.
We are going to on you guys so hard
9ers by 17? You won't even put up 17
I'll wager 30 days self bannishment from this forum on the game, ya got balls or bb's? Put up or shut up!
Based on your betting record, the trends that you base your picks on clearly don't make sense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)