Reply With Quote
Skull obsessed with rewriting the history of Manu Ginobili. Good luck with that.
Italian League / Olympics > NBA ------ NOT!
Skull obsessed with rewriting the history of Manu Ginobili. Good luck with that.
Yes. Here's an example: Manu Ginobili was awesome in the 2013 Finals. He was clutch, made good decisions, and was our best player. Without him we would have been swept by the Heat, but he rose up like a champion and almost single-handedly stemmed the Heat Horde.
Oh, is Skull-1 a TheGreatYacht troll? I had TGY on ignore and just noticed that they have inverted matching avatars.
Just another for my list I guess.
Yes, sticking one's head in the sand or fingers in their ears when confronted with unpleasant truth makes that truth null and void. Good strategy.
Last edited by Skull-1; 11-12-2013 at 12:02 PM.
Works for ObamaYes, sticking one's head in the sand or fingers in their ears when confronted with unpleasant truth makes that truth null and void. Good strategy.
You have a point.
So much irony in this post...Yes, sticking one's head in the sand or fingers in their ears when confronted with unpleasant truth makes that truth null and void. Good strategy.
So much irony in this post...
Again, you haven't refuted a thing I have said. Lying to yourself doesn't change that fact. Now get back to school before you're truant.
, he is still arguably a top 5-10 SG. The talent level of SGs in the NBA is lacking these days tbh.
You've yet to make a point.... what's there to refute?
Did he beat Duncan, Wade, Lebron, etc as "the man" in his team, yes or no? simple question.
Don't give it much thought really. Superstar doesn't always translate to winner.
Plus "superstar" is a fairly loose term... everybody has it's own idea of what that is. There's no doubt he was a star in some of his teams though.
Manu's career is like a storybook. What hasn't he done? Who that has truly watched him over the years hasn't been aware that eventually he would slow down? I like the way he is playing now and think Marco can help in making sure his minutes are reasonable.
on a serious note. I have to agree Manu was a superstar at some point. Because of his international fame, similar thing as scrub Yao Ming. Manu brought many latin and especially argentine fans to the NBA and should be commended for that. Most argentines hardly knew what a rebound was, or any rules of the game (most still don't tbh)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950_FI...d_Championshipon a serious note. I have to agree Manu was a superstar at some point. Because of his international fame, similar thing as scrub Yao Ming. Manu brought many latin and especially argentine fans to the NBA and should be commended for that. Most argentines hardly knew what a rebound was, or any rules of the game (most still don't tbh
Bolivians on the other hand...
Based on how decorated his career has been I'd personally call Manu a legitimate superstar in his prime. He's the most celebrated athlete in his home country, he's won multiple NBA championships, and personally led his country's team to an olympic gold medal against Team USA. That's a superstar if I ever heard one.
How easy is for the haters to remember every wrong Manu did for the Spurs to lose a championship they even include .4 which is rather pathetic, but then they forget the other "could have been" championships where Manu was the only one showing up, or worse when he was injured and missed a playoff run, can you guys remind me how far did the Spurs go?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions