Reply With Quote
you need to take that screen door on tour.
Mate, this is really unnecessary. Have a little class.
you need to take that screen door on tour.
you're full of logical fallacies such as this one.
basically why you suck at debating.
I don't think xmas really meant to call you a cuck - take it easy.
You are a cuck - but I don't think he meant that.
I really don't think it is possible for him to do that, that takes some mental effort, something apparently he does not have enough of to expend.
Plus people are not born with "class", they have to spend the time to develop it, and usually by your middle 20s, you either have it, or you never will.
About the only time he posts anything of relevance is when fuuzzy talks about the Spurs, and when he does that, it is usually a concise, civil, and knowledgeable post.
But about anything else, uh uh, not going to happen. It is beyond his intellect IMHO.
That is why I encourage him to stick to Spurs related material, or try joking a little bit.
What?
Neither you, nor fuuzzy, nor woo, can take a little constructive criticism from some of the wisest men of our ages?
That is a sad legacy IMHO.
Hey at lest you stopped calling people, chap, which is not how kiwis speak.
Oh. And now you are an authority on New Zealanders too?
Your ego knows no bounds!
Quoting them does not mean you applied what they said to the situation. I applied your Franklin quote to yourself. You applied it to nothing. The Plato nonsense is 'the hidden world' bull which again there is no basis for much like the notion of 'god.' You didn't even demonstrate how it applies.Hmm, so you are saying that not only am I full of , but so are Benjamin Franklin, Roger Bacon, and Plato, among other great thinkers?
Let's quickly examine your contentious and fallacious post, shall we?
I wasn't labeling anything or anyone.
I was quoting recognized authorities on the word "atheism".
More of your pseudo-intellectualism on display.
You are the guys who were making up your own definitions as if you were both authorities.
The record of posts will show and prove this.
Maybe you should go to work for Dictionary.com, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, or Wikipedia, since apparently you think you know more than they do.
Words have more than one definition.
You are a charlatan.
I'm on a ventrilo server right now with 7 aussies and a kiwi. They say that 'chap' if anything is a brit thing and they say people do not talk like that.Oh. And now you are an authority on New Zealanders too?
Your ego knows no bounds!
My ego? GFY.
You're full of unintelligence.I don't think xmas really meant to call you a cuck - take it easy.
You are a cuck - but I don't think he meant that.
Oh look. Another logical fallacy.What?
Neither you, nor fuuzzy, nor woo, can take a little constructive criticism from some of the wisest men of our ages?
That is a sad legacy IMHO.
Keep em coming.
And this is more of the same ol, same ol straight out of the brain of pseudo intellectual.
You do not understand so you try ridicule or obfuscation, or both.
And all of that fails because none of your arguments have any basis in reality, or at least the reality that most of us commonly share, consequently that is why I quoted those sages.
But it apparently went right over your head.
Instead you counter with more baseless accusation, ridicule, and baiting, none of which has anything to do with the central point, and thus weakens your premiss, if you ever had one in the first place.
You cannot arbitrarily set yourself up as an authority on something, and especially not on definitions where established authorities already exist, and are in disagreement with you.
Nor can you arbitrarily set yourself up as an authority on people from foreign places like N.Z.
That is the epitome of egotistical arrogance, nothing less, nothing more.
Funny how Xmas dodged my post.
So where's that proof of God?
What precisely of what I am saying is pseudo-intellectual?
When I say you are a pseudo-intellectual I point to two things.
1) Using a quote finder to find quotes from various philosophers and spamming them
2) Trying to conflate parallel universes and string theory claiming it is mathematically justified
Those are both examples of someone trying to sound like they are intelligent when in truth they are talking out of their ass.
Now dodge this with some more dissembling and ignore WBK trying to bring something substantive to the discussion.
You are a charlatan.
Again, one last time, you cannot arbitrarily set yourselves up as authorities on any subject where established authorities already exist.
Until you first understand this, then we can proceed from there in having a competent intelligent and fruitful debate.
If you can't, then there is no point in going any further.
You have to have a premiss that is backed by established authority.
Simple debate mechanics.
Until you start there, then there is no point in going further.
Get back to me when you are ready to begin at the beginning.
You cannot put the cart before the horse, either of you.
Good luck.
Oh, and enjoy your baiting.
I addressed you both in the plural, or did you conveniently miss that fact?
So, you are wrong again, I neither acknowledged nor dodged you.
If you had been paying attention you would have seen this.
Reread my last post before this one.
Then let me know.
We can go from there.
Or continue on the fruitless path you are already on and see what it brings you.
You might also bring a little humor to the table as well.
No offense mate, but Jakey is a lovable chap and your friends sound like a bunch of wankers. Mate, seriously, why are you wound so tight? Jake likes to hit the speed bag and it keeps the stress away. Try it mate.
He's a coward wbk. He won't address anything head on and tries this dissembling nonsense. You are wasting your time.
Why?
Because I refuse to suc b to your feeble attempts to bait me into fruitless pissing contests?
It is ironic that what you accuse me of is the very tactic you are engaged in yourself.
And you want my participation?
Don't be silly.
I've done my time here making a fool of myself.
Now it's your turn.
You are doing an admiral job of it so far IMHO.
Much offense, bloke. Mate, you are not from down under, bloke. Wankers are bloke mates shrimp on the barbie. wallabies and joey crocodile hunters.
See. I'm from Australia!
C'mon, fuuzzy, that is an epic fail.
This is further proof of your pseudo intelligence at work.
You should really stop, because you are making a gigantic fool of yourself.
You addressed me but not the points I made in my post. Or did you conveniently miss that fact?
lol you addressed me but didn't acknowledge me. Cool contradiction.So, you are wrong again, I neither acknowledged nor dodged you.
Neat. So, where's that evidence for God?blah blah blah
dp
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
