Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 110 of 110
  1. #101
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325
    Actually, he was a first round pick, #20 overall in 2010. Not exactly "out of the blue".
    Sure, yet also a "forgettable" first round pick.

  2. #102
    Tim to Tony to Manu! bdictjames's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    5,686
    36 points against the Rockets.

  3. #103
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Sure, yet also a "forgettable" first round pick.
    "Out of the blue" is Gary Neal, never drafted, bounced around Europe and made an NBA playoff team rotation at age 25. First round picks are "reclaimed" every year by other teams. That's not news or unusual.

  4. #104
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    Anderson was terrible when he came back. He was terrible to start his second season. His option wasn't picked up because Danny was BALLING. The End. Or, not quite. Queue last season. Both Kawhi and Jack go down. Anderson re-signs and plays well in 10 games. He gets a shot with Houston afterwards, and is traded to Philly and has an even better shot at rotation minutes. Yeah, Pop really hates this guy.

    Did Pop shoot your dog or something?
    Should I try speaking in your native language or is this just a reading comprehension thing? Reread my post and tell me again where I said Pop hated James Anderson. The whole point of signing prospects is to watch them develop. When the team is constantly picking 20th or later in the draft, you're pretty much assured that those picks are projects at best. Is your idea of development to watch a player sink or swim for a year, then, cast them aside like yesterday's garbage? The guy showed progress prior to the injury and was never given a fair shake when he returned unless you count his 4th quarter entrance's into blow outs. Danny Green played just 8 games in the 2010-11 season so that part of your argument is flat out laughable. By the time Green started BALLING, Anderson was already out of the rotation.

    The moral of exstatic's story is that its OK to waste roster spots with garbage talent like De Colo but heaven forbid using that slot for a draft pick in development like Anderson. The Spurs aren't a team that can just buy talent whenever it becomes available. They have to work hard at developing their talent so when the time comes, you aren't stuck in rebuilding mode for five or six years. It sure would be nice to have a versatile wing man who could backup Leonard at SF.
    Last edited by Hoops Czar; 11-14-2013 at 05:31 PM.

  5. #105
    Hello Moto elemento's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    3,101
    GL to him

    Even though he had a great game, he doesn't play like this every game. Philly fans complain about the same issues that he had here. Too slow, cannot create his own shot and his ball-handling skills are still poor.

    He is a great shooter and great shooters can have a big day when they're on. Neal had several great offensive games with us.

  6. #106
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    33
    This kid could score since college. 24ppg, 1st team All-American and Big 12 player of the year as a junior. Playing defense at an NBA level was always going to be his key for development. If anyone remembers what he looked like in those first few weeks before he got injured in SA, he was blocking shots and putting himself in good position despite his limited athleticism. I think he can carve out a role in the rotation for a good NBA team. But relying on him as a scorer and playing two ways as a good defender, that might be a bridge too far for him at the moment

  7. #107
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Should I try speaking in your native language or is this just a reading comprehension thing? Reread my post and tell me again where I said Pop hated James Anderson. The whole point of signing prospects is to watch them develop. When the team is constantly picking 20th or later in the draft, you're pretty much assured that those picks are projects at best. Is your idea of development to watch a player sink or swim for a year, then, cast them aside like yesterday's garbage? The guy showed progress prior to the injury and was never given a fair shake when he returned unless you count his 4th quarter entrance's into blow outs. Danny Green played just 8 games in the 2010-11 season so that part of your argument is flat out laughable. By the time Green started BALLING, Anderson was already out of the rotation.

    The moral of exstatic's story is that its OK to waste roster spots with garbage talent like De Colo but heaven forbid using that slot for a draft pick in development like Anderson. The Spurs aren't a team that can just buy talent whenever it becomes available. They have to work hard at developing their talent so when the time comes, you aren't stuck in rebuilding mode for five or six years. It sure would be nice to have a versatile wing man who could backup Leonard at SF.
    OK
    When he came back from injury, Pop never gave him the time of day. Never even attempted to get him involved. Yet, he'll keep Nando around with his piss poor at ude and his D-league talent, and for what?
    I like James and hate Nando, but they have the same problem: they were (or are) buried on the depth chart. They only kept Nando because there was no option to pick up. He was guaranteed this year. James wasn't guaranteed for year 3 going into year 2 and he was the fourth string SG. They didn't pick up his option. Nothing he did in year 2 made that look like a mistake. Not a damn thing. Then, lo and behold, Pop gave him another chance last year, picking him up when Kawhi and Jack went out. He played well in 10 games and earned another NBA shot.

    Not sure why you're still obsessing about this when we have Manu, Beli, and Green at SG.

  8. #108
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    Should be interesting to see what Anderson does with his promotion to the starting unit in Philly, since he had about every chance in the world to make himself the spurs starting SG and did diddlysquat each time.

    I'm guessing history will repeat itself there as it did here.

  9. #109
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Anderson started at the two to begin 2011-2012. So it's not like Pop didn't give him the chance. The truth is that James was flat-out horrible. There was no way Pop could justify keeping him in the SL and he didn't even seem to deserve to have his option picked up. Green meanwhile was awesome in limited minutes. He took the spot from Anderson over the course of a couple of months of thoroughly outplaying him. Then Manu came back, and there was simply no room for him in the rotation. Compounding that was that he was awful in garbage time.

    I wish they would have kept him. They probably would not have needed to sign Belinelli in the off-season and could have kept the MLE in their back pocket. But it's not like Anderson would be anything more than the ninth or 10th man. Don't be tricked by his game against Houston. He regressed big time against Atlanta.

  10. #110
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    5,544
    Should I try speaking in your native language or is this just a reading comprehension thing? Reread my post and tell me again where I said Pop hated James Anderson. The whole point of signing prospects is to watch them develop. When the team is constantly picking 20th or later in the draft, you're pretty much assured that those picks are projects at best. Is your idea of development to watch a player sink or swim for a year, then, cast them aside like yesterday's garbage? The guy showed progress prior to the injury and was never given a fair shake when he returned unless you count his 4th quarter entrance's into blow outs. Danny Green played just 8 games in the 2010-11 season so that part of your argument is flat out laughable. By the time Green started BALLING, Anderson was already out of the rotation.

    The moral of exstatic's story is that its OK to waste roster spots with garbage talent like De Colo but heaven forbid using that slot for a draft pick in development like Anderson. The Spurs aren't a team that can just buy talent whenever it becomes available. They have to work hard at developing their talent so when the time comes, you aren't stuck in rebuilding mode for five or six years. It sure would be nice to have a versatile wing man who could backup Leonard at SF.
    Can't look at it all in a vacuum. Spurs made this move in January 2012 when they still were burdened with the RJ deal (an extra year than SJax's) and he would have tied up a roster spot in 2012-13, as would have the #1 pick they gave up to move RJ. Manu, Green, Neal, RJ and Kawhi were all ahead of him for wing minutes, so he wasn't getting a chance to develop that year, especially given the shortened lockout season.

    Now he shows his first sign of life almost two years later.

    I'm not a De Colo fan but he wasn't in the picture yet at that point. Reason he's still around is because he's still under contract. First taker that offers anything of value, and he's out the door.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •