i've been called out for no reason, not sure how does that makes me salty.
Did Marco bang your wife or something?
He's playing fine and making stuff happen off the bench. He already looks better than Neal, and I really liked Neal's role with this team when he wasn't playing PG. It's like you want him to be bad. Salty as .
i've been called out for no reason, not sure how does that makes me salty.
and how exactly some blowouts can prove that wrong?
LMAO at this clown Raven.
![]()
Ever think part of the reason we are blowing teams outs is due to Belinelli's presence on the court
i never questioned his ability to score in bunches tbh, his ability to score in bunches in a playoff game is a whole other discussion. Also, it is not a coincidence that the only game we lost was Belinelli's best game. His D however is terrible and if you pay close attention to it, you can notice that even in blowouts. The fact that a lot of teams are currently terrible, doesn't change that tbh, you've got to look at the big picture.
Those goalposts sure are getting tired.
That is the one aspect Neal has on Belinelli...
who fkin cares? all i was saying is that neal was able to move the chains when the offense stagnated in the PO and belinelli will not, neal could not be a pg for us and belinelli can be that even less, neal could not defend anyone well, belinelli will defend even worse. I was always positive about letting him go, but saying belinelli is an upgrade over neal is flat out re ed.
^at this
sounds like Obama backtracking on his healthcare today![]()
where did i backtrack?making up
That Italian sausage sure is salty I saiddddddddd
that's the same Obama said
FAIL. Marco already proved he's superior defender to Neal. the proof: Pop gave him all possible minutes, instead with Neal, Pop would pull him after his daily mistakes.
FAIL. Marco already proved he's clutch in Portland.less clutch shooting,
FAIL. Marco is averaging less TOs than Nealincapability of handling the ball
Marco shooting 50% from 3and worse percentages from 3.
Neal shot 38%
Raven
complete and utter failure
wow that's so pathetic even for you
man, we're what 8 games into the season and you are revising marco's career percentages? are you trying to say he is not a horrible defender ? i don't get what are you trying to say, honestly it's funny because you are trying to troll me up by saying nothing and just quoting something that i said that is pretty blatant tbh..
I'm comparing #s in Spurs unis. not my fault Marco already proved you wrong 8 games into the season![]()
The way you're turning on Neal is pretty cold blooded tbh when you used to have him as your avatar... Neal = season saving shot. Neal = best player of a finals game. Neal makes bad shots and good shots at the same rate, there's no bad shot for him basically which is why he was so good for the Spurs in the POs...
Beli is a worse shooter and a bit better passing and driving. It's not a huge upgrade or downgrade but it's gonna be damn hard for Beli to live up to what Neal has done... Let's see Beli running the point against pressure defense to laugh a little bit like Neal was asked to do...
Last edited by Baam; 11-14-2013 at 01:43 PM.
An healthy Neal is shooting 52% from 3 on scruby team with worse looks right now...
he actually was awful in 5 games, played what the system gave him and nothing else in two and was very good in the one which ended in a loss with a load of points given up. If that's proving anything than good, but yeah you are both re ed and ignorant to what the rules of statistics are.
You are the one that seem ignorant of how stats work. Nobody hits their average every game. Numbers go up, and numbers go down, game to game. Overall, Beli is playing very well.
yeah, none is going to have .500 or more from three point range, so i'm not sure what your point is, since obviously hater's point is that 8 games in you can tell he is going to be.
the point is you were completely and utterly wrong about Marco. And don't worry, we have ALL SEASON to remind you if you keep doubling down on stupidity
btw this man shot 47%
![]()
Last edited by hater; 11-14-2013 at 02:34 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)