We evolved from a great ape, now what?

[Blake]

No one but the trolls are crying lately dumb .

You don't know wtf respect is - so deal with it - and figure it out - and get cucked in the meantime - same difference to me.


Also - this isn't jr college night class - so don't worry about logical fallacies and go yourself.

No, you cry incessantly.

If you want respect during a discussion or debate, you're going to need to learn what a logical fallacy is.

Until then, nobody will see you as anything more than a crazy ass talking clown.

[silverblk mystix]

No, you cry incessantly.

If you want respect during a discussion or debate, you're going to need to learn what a logical fallacy is.

Until then, nobody will see you as anything more than a crazy ass talking clown.

You think I want respect?

That is your problem. No one gives two s what you think anyone "needs" to do. You your pants when invited to meet in person - so that "tough talk" is invalid.

Go find someone to your wife - this is pretty much your ceiling anyway.

[DJR210]

Intercom - **Code 2, Cellblock A!!, Code 2, Cellblock A!!**

*types away happily on ST*

[SA210]

You think I want respect?

That is your problem. No one gives two s what you think anyone "needs" to do. You your pants when invited to meet in person - so that "tough talk" is invalid.

Go find someone to your wife - this is pretty much your ceiling anyway.

While she stares at the ceiling as the bull is giving it to her

[silverblk mystix]

While she stares at the ceiling as the bull is giving it to her

[Blake]

You think I want respect?

Yes.

" give respect, get respect "

Damn you're stupid.

[SA210]

Damn I'm stupid.

[Blake]

^i called that

[SA210]

i called that bf of my wife..he said yes, he'll bang her some more Yay!

[Woo Bum-kon]

Let's review:
- You tried to assert that the definition of atheism that I posted was made up by me because it didn't exactly match the definition on dictionary.com. Let's first disregard the fact that you are getting your definition of atheism from a general dictionary as if dictionary.com is an actual authority on the subject ( , I took one philosophy class and even I know not to use a simple dictionary when talking about potentially complex subjects ).


Anyway, here's what I described atheism as:






Here's you accusing me of making it up:






I have to take a break for a moment and again laugh at you for using broad definitions and thinking that they are the only definitions there are.


Anyway, here's the rest of your post:




That's you accusing me of making up the definition I provided.


Again, here's "my" definition:






And here's the second definition on Dictionary.com, which was YOUR source, by the way:






So, not only were you completely wrong about me trying to establish myself as an authority, you also never even bothered to admit it. , you were too lazy to even read the second definition from your own source. I pointed out repeatedly that dictionary.com does not contradict what I posted, and you ignored me.


So, in regards to that whole definition of atheism argument we were having, YOU. WERE. WRONG. You were wrong when you accused me of making up my own definition and you were being stupid and lazy for using dictionary.com as your source in the first place.


If we are going to get anywhere, first acknowledge that you were wrong when you accused me of trying to set myself up as an authority on what atheism is.

I posted this hours ago and that coward xmas hasn't even attempted to refute the points I made in this post. So, when he told ClipperNation that he addressed every point I made, he lied. He didn't address the points I made when I originally made them, and he is refusing to address them now.

[DJR210]

I posted this hours ago and that coward xmas hasn't even attempted to refute the points I made in this post. So, when he told ClipperNation that he addressed every point I made, he lied. He didn't address the points I made when I originally made them, and he is refusing to address them now.

Let him get some sleep. He has posted periods and pseudo-intellect haiku format bull for the last 24 hours or so, non-stop. He finally ran out of gas, that's all.

[spurraider21]

Bot no one here claimed it genius.

everybody in this thread that implies evolution is a complete farce is going with the "creator" model, which claims the existence of a deity. maybe not the judeo-christian god (though probably), but a god nonetheless.

the whole "we are all blind, nobody knows" crap also applies to the flying spaghetti monster. you can't claim something exists with no evidence or reason behind it, then put the burden of proof on the other side, which is exactly what that is doing.

[silverblk mystix]

everybody in this thread that implies evolution is a complete farce is going with the "creator" model, which claims the existence of a deity. maybe not the judeo-christian god (though probably), but a god nonetheless.

the whole "we are all blind, nobody knows" crap also applies to the flying spaghetti monster. you can't claim something exists with no evidence or reason behind it, then put the burden of proof on the other side, which is exactly what that is doing.

Post the exact post where someone made the claim.

Simply put.

[spurraider21]

Post the exact post where someone made the claim.

Simply put.

You cannot have creation without creator. Playing a cute game is not worth my time.

[silverblk mystix]

You cannot have creation without creator. Playing a cute game is not worth my time.

I don't think you were talking about me - I never made a claim regarding "god" and I wasn't playing any games.


As far as the creation without the creator -

wrong person - there are trolls in here who would circle jerk around you for days with that claim.

I don't have the need to - irregardless - of my opinion on it.

[DisAsTerBot]

irregardless

[spurraider21]

All I know it's re ed to claim creation and not simultaneously claim the existence of a creator. It is equally re ed to put the burden of proof on the side not making a claim. If you cannot dispute these points, then do not respond to this

[silverblk mystix]

All I know it's re ed to claim creation and not simultaneously claim the existence of a creator. It is equally re ed to put the burden of proof on the side not making a claim. If you cannot dispute these points, then do not respond to this

Still waiting for you to post where the claim was made.

If you can't - then don't respond to this post.

Also - you may possibly be right regarding the creation/creator thing - no one knows.

You may also be wrong and all this could have come from nothing - no one knows.

It could also be something completely different, unknown, mysterious, undefinable -


No one in knows.

[Trill Clinton]

I posted this hours ago and that coward xmas hasn't even attempted to refute the points I made in this post. So, when he told ClipperNation that he addressed every point I made, he lied. He didn't address the points I made when I originally made them, and he is refusing to address them now.

you take the whole atheist thing very serious, fam. as much as you complain about me spittin' hot fiya you are just as passionate or more about your atheism beliefs as i am for equality for minorities.

[silverblk mystix]

you take the whole atheist thing very serious, fam. as much as you complain about me spittin' hot fiya you are just as passionate or more about your atheism beliefs as i am for equality for minorities.

just' sayin'

[Woo Bum-kon]

you take the whole atheist thing very serious, fam. as much as you complain about me spittin' hot fiya you are just as passionate or more about your atheism beliefs as i am for equality for minorities.

Atheism is neither here nor there. I would take issue with this coward's behavior no matter what we were talking about.

[SA210]

That's called butthurt ^^

[Blake]

Still waiting for you to post where the claim was made.

It's the whole point of this thread, stupid.

[Blake]

butthurt ^^

[SA210]

That's called extensive butthurt by a cuck ^^