Not only is this a complete dodge, this doesn't even make any sense.
Why don't you post the exact post where a claim was made regarding god?
Because you pulled it outta your ass and tried to attribute it to xmas - you deceiving little prick - everything else that followed was garbage because you never posted the exact post where the claim was made.
So you can STFU troll.
Not only is this a complete dodge, this doesn't even make any sense.
So you never had a post of anyone making a claim.
Got it.
back in the 90s pulling a TRoll train was part of our job at RTT (Rack The TRolls) and TRolls.net
the other THE
http://www.thetrolls.net/phpbb/
http://www.thetrolls.net/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=2
T1B
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/vie...+mouse#p718820
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/sea...d527aa0f7b9dd0
Jim Romes Smack chat
http://web.archive.org/web/199702261...at/board.shtml
http://web.archive.org/web/200005112...=10&LastLogin=
There was another forum the Smack bat haven't seen it.
Back in the 90s at Jim Romes smack chat forum they had a topic called "pile on" it later became "say something about the poster above you" and other names. I get a kick out of someone lecturing me on what the proper way to name the topic when they was probably in diapers or elementary school back in 1996![]()
Last edited by mouse; 11-15-2013 at 08:46 PM.
Making a claim about what? What are you talking about?
In this post, xmas outright accuses me of making up the definition.
"B-bu-but he said if I wanted to make up my own definitions, not that I did!"
If you want to play that game, fine, I will. xmas never technically accused me of making up definitions, did he?
That's a direct challenge. Okay, I accept that challenge.
Here you go:
Oh, it turns out he did claim that I created the definition I posted. So
No more hiding, xmas.
In before, "I only said that you create your own unverifiable definitions, I never said that you created a definition of 'atheism'!" You can't weasel out of this one on a technicality.
I knew you would try to weasel out of it.
But it still won't fly.
You can't twist them to suit your own ends this time.
My posts stand on their own merit.
They say exactly what I want them to say.
Semantics won't help you.
The only fool you have made is yourself.
And the more you quote me, the more foolish you will look.
Try some laughter next time.
It will get you a lot farther.
![]()
I predict there will be some weasel attempts
Deflecting.
And you were right.
But unfortunately for you, it was Woo doing the weaseling.
![]()
I didn't find all these links just to have my post buried on page 16
Actual post. ^
Lolololol.
Sorry Mouse, I am extremely busy, but I will check them out.
mouse wants some attention.
Cool non-response. You asked me to show you where you, or anybody else, accused me of making up my own definition. I did.
If I am wrong, explain why. Don't quote people who have nothing to do with this.
Explain the last quote of yours in my previous post.
you and I disagree on that.
It also wouldn't be unfortunate for me either way.
Then you can't read.
Still no explanation.
I think the popular opinion is that it's you with the reading comprehension problems.
Called it.
Woo gets destroyed and he weasels and tap dances and other idiots still try to help him by posting garbage and insults.
It is what it is.
I will definitely be checking on those!
Thanks!
The TROLLL TRAIIINNNNNN!!!!!!!
![]()
You're too unintelligent to know the score.
Okay, now sbm is accusing me of being wrong still. Next comes SA210. Then mouse.
Don't expect an explanation from any of them about why. I'm just wrong. I take time to make claims that I back with evidence, and all I get is, "You're wrong." Do I get an explanation? Nope.
Unintelligence is a guy who allows other men to his wife and then starts a thread asking for advice.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)