Reply With Quote
No.
- Just as good as a shooter
- A much better Defender and game recognition
No.
No.
Plus he looks like Spud McKenzie
that or some type of mulatto Klingon.
Thompson would be much easier to stop if he didn't play with Curry, tbh..
He was also pretty bad last year, a 12 PER and extremely inconsistent..we'll see if be can maintain his hot start this year..
But he is progressing nicely. He's not a dominant iso type player, but obviously has a useful skill set and seems to be finding his way.
The Warriors are a fun team to watch, and Klay Thompson is not better than Steph Curry.
I'm a fan of both tbh but Curry is the superior player. You can take Klay out of a game but Curry is much tougher to gameplan against IMO.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2013110824Thompson would be much easier to stop if he didn't play with Curry, tbh
I see Jim with 8 points in 32 minutes.
nothing more then a spot up shooter
He was completely useless against Kawhi in the playoffs, tbh..once Pop made the switch in game 3, his series was over..
I think i saw kirbe with 0 points in the last lakers game.
No
You are stupid.
Going to bookmark this stuff for future refrences tbh.
It's a good thing there weren't message boards in the 90's. I'm sure there would have been some mancrushing nut hugger saying Pippen is better than Jordan or something similarly re ed then too.
No
He does have stronger ankles tbh, but no Steph is better.
No. He plays a different role, and he's nowhere near the shooter. He does have Curry's tunnel vision though, not seeing anyone on the court to pass the ball to. Curry has his moments when he's amazing, Klay as well, but no.
NO.
Also, I hope you get verbally crapped on for just saying that
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
