We evolved from a great ape, now what?

[xmas1997]

It's a trolls job to get angry when they lose. Expect more rage from them. All we can do is continue to laugh at their fits and make them angrier in doing so lol

Well, I'm done playing Woos games.
I humored him for a while, but since he has shown himself to be a poor loser, then for sure he is just trolling for his kicks.
I warned him ahead of time too, but only a wise man would heed that.
I am starting to figure out better who the trolls are on here.
Most of them use insults and ridicule as their primary weapon to compensate for their lack of discussion and debate skills. And they use questions over and over again as their secondary tactics, but their agendas are all the same.
And yes, it is a clear symptom of their inferiority complexes and pseudo-intellects.
I'll catch them quicker next time and just disregard them without wasting any time or effort.
You guys can bash them all you want, my blessings. They seem to only respond to that.
I will just not pay any attention to them.
I know two or three for sure, and at least one quasi-troll. I won't mention his name, but his initial starts with a "b".

[SA210]

lol

[Woo Bum-kon]

Still too afraid to answer my question.

All I asked you to do was explain why you made those if/then posts if you were not actually accusing me of anything. Why won't you answer?

[mouse]

Where did you come up with these?

I remembered forums i used to post in and did a search on the ...

http://archive.org/web/




Do a search on 1997 WOAI and find the only 5 Spur Fans that existed before 1998.

[SA210]

^^ is that Clitternation in that pic

[xmas1997]

Still too afraid to answer my question.

All I asked you to do was explain why you made those if/then posts if you were not actually accusing me of anything. Why won't you answer?

My very very last and final answer for you because I wasted enough time on you already:
The "if/then" posts are self explanatory as well as a very common debate strategy.
You would have known right away had you bothered to read my posts and/or had you ever participated in school debates. Man, those were a long time ago, I never thought those debates would be of use unless I became an attorney or politician. Go figure.
In many ways it is similar to the "baiting" that trolls use, but not quite the same because there is no malicious intent.
'Nuff said. Unless you can try to be a good sport about this.
I always admit when I am wrong on here, done it many times, it is not demeaning.
The most important thing IMHO is to find the humor in everything, as long as it isn't at someone else's expense.

[xmas1997]

Actually I do have one other thing to tell you, Woo, I honestly hold no ill will toward you, whether you are trolling, or not.

Same with Blake, although if he were a fly, I'd have no qualms about swatting him!

[Woo Bum-kon]

Okay, I'm going to sleep. Will xmas actually answer my question by the time I wake up? Probably not. I'll have to ask him another fifty times. He'll fake indignation and call me a troll. He will quote people who have nothing to do with our discussion. He will post paragraph after paragraph telling us about his intentions. He will post paragraph after paragraph on why he won't respond to me anymore while still responding.

All of that is preferable to simply explaining what he meant in a few posts. All I asked him to do was to explain why he posted what he did, but he refuses to answer. This is the philosophy guy, ladies and gentlemen. Apparently, people well-versed in philosophy don't care about discussion and would rather whine to each other than express their points of view in a meaningful way.

[xmas1997]

Okay, I'm going to sleep. Will xmas actually answer my question by the time I wake up? Probably not. I'll have to ask him another fifty times. He'll fake indignation and call me a troll. He will quote people who have nothing to do with our discussion. He will post paragraph after paragraph telling us about his intentions. He will post paragraph after paragraph on why he won't respond to me anymore while still responding.

All of that is preferable to simply explaining what he meant in a few posts. All I asked him to do was to explain why he posted what he did, but he refuses to answer. This is the philosophy guy, ladies and gentlemen. Apparently, people well-versed in philosophy don't care about discussion and would rather whine to each other than express their points of view in a meaningful way.

I told you.
Common debate strategy.
Self explanatory.
Do I have to keep repeating this?

[Woo Bum-kon]

My very very last and final answer for you because I wasted enough time on you already:
The "if/then" posts are self explanatory as well as a very common debate strategy.
You would have known right away had you bothered to read my posts and/or had you ever participated in school debates. Man, those were a long time ago, I never thought those debates would be of use unless I became an attorney or politician. Go figure.
In many ways it is similar to the "baiting" that trolls use, but not quite the same because there is no malicious intent.
'Nuff said. Unless you can try to be a good sport about this.
I always admit when I am wrong on here, done it many times, it is not demeaning.
The most important thing IMHO is to find the humor in everything, as long as it isn't at someone else's expense.

You still can't answer my question. .

So, instead of just explaining why you posted what you posted, you will just state that what you posted is self-explanatory. That makes sense to you. You could have answered my question hours ago, but you would rather just say that I am wrong without explaining.

When I accuse you of being wrong, I explain why I believe that you are wrong, and I use evidence to support my claim. When you accuse me of being wrong, you just accuse me and call it a day. I have to ask you dozens of times to explain yourself, while you only have to ask me once. What kind of skilled debater refuses to give any reason for his statements?

[Woo Bum-kon]

I told you.
Common debate strategy.
Self explanatory.
Do I have to keep repeating this?

Again, saying that it is self-explanatory doesn't answer anything. Explain it. Stop wasting time.

[xmas1997]

Again, saying that it is self-explanatory doesn't answer anything. Explain it. Stop wasting time.

It is self explanatory, Woo.
It is a very very common tactic in debates.
Look it up online, they can explain it better than I can.
The "if/then" query.

But you "demanding" that I do something will get you nowhere fast.
Is that an Asian cultural thing?

[Woo Bum-kon]

Was I trying to set myself up as an authority or not on what the definition of atheism is? Yes or no? Hopefully, you'll answer this question before Thanksgiving.

[BRHornet45]

And your week-long meltdown and stubborn clinging to a magical sky man is helping the human race how?

lol Clipper my that one was good

real talk

[SA210]

You still can't answer my question. .

So, instead of just explaining why you posted what you posted, you will just state that what you posted is self-explanatory. That makes sense to you. You could have answered my question hours ago, but you would rather just say that I am wrong without explaining.

When I accuse you of being wrong, I explain why I believe that you are wrong, and I use evidence to support my claim. When you accuse me of being wrong, you just accuse me and call it a day. I have to ask you dozens of times to explain yourself, while you only have to ask me once. What kind of skilled debater refuses to give any reason for his statements?

Hi troll. I noticed you cried about others saying things in a conversation that didn't concern them. That's funny bc that's what you always tried doing to me and other posters before. You will probably deny that or put your spin on it, that's fine. I expect that. But I see you don't like it when the shoe is on the other foot. Whether xmas gives you the answer you want him to give you or not, so you can save face, there is one irrefutable fact here. Whether you talk to him, me, sbm, or anyone...you are one angry dude.

You are freakin as mad as Blake, chump and the rest of the trolls. Why are you so angry bro? It's not good for you man. You are pissed off, all the damn time.

So whatever crap you wanna reply to this or any other..fact remains..you are one unhappy pissed off butthurt little man.

That is all.

Happy trolling

[xmas1997]

Was I trying to set myself up as an authority or not on what the definition of atheism is? Yes or no? Hopefully, you'll answer this question before Thanksgiving.

I don't know, were you?
You would know better than I would.
What I know about is the "if/then" tactic used in debates.
"If" one thing, "then" another.
What's to explain?
It is what it is.
Never used it before?

[Woo Bum-kon]

I don't know, were you?
You would know better than I would.

- Atheism is a lack of belief in a god.
- Atheism is a disbelief in a god.

Based on your understanding of the English language, do these definitions contradict each other? If not, then why did you ask me if I was trying to contradict your source if I didn't?

[Blake]

I don't know, were you?
You would know better than I would.
What I know about is the "if/then" tactic used in debates.
"If" one thing, "then" another.
What's to explain?
It is what it is.
Never used it before?

If you knew how to properly debate, then you wouldn't have so many people ting on you.

[xmas1997]

Was I trying to set myself up as an authority or not on what the definition of atheism is? Yes or no? Hopefully, you'll answer this question before Thanksgiving.

Woo, why do you ask me why you do something when you know perfectly well why you do something.
You want me to read your mind, or what?

Were you?
And if so, why were you?
I honestly have no idea what you were doing.
And I know even less why.
Ask yourself.
You want me to psychoanalyze you or what?
Sorry, I'm not qualified for that.
You did what you did for what ever reason you did it for.

[Blake]

Hi troll. I noticed you cried about others saying things in a conversation that didn't concern them. That's funny bc that's what you always tried doing to me and other posters before. You will probably deny that or put your spin on it, that's fine. I expect that. But I see you don't like it when the shoe is on the other foot. Whether xmas gives you the answer you want him to give you or not, so you can save face, there is one irrefutable fact here. Whether you talk to him, me, sbm, or anyone...you are one angry dude.

You are freakin as mad as Blake, chump and the rest of the trolls. Why are you so angry bro? It's not good for you man. You are pissed off, all the damn time.

So whatever crap you wanna reply to this or any other..fact remains..you are one unhappy pissed off butthurt little man.

That is all.

Happy trolling

you're not the mad one. It's everyone else that's mad.

I predict you'll do something mad. Go.

[Woo Bum-kon]

This dude is trying so hard to play dumb right now. There is no way he has seriously debated anybody. It's amazing to see the lengths that he will go to avoid answering a direct question.

No, I did not try to go against authority when I posted my definition of atheism. Why did you ask me if I was trying? What did you see in my posts that gave you that impression?

[xmas1997]

If you knew how to properly debate, then you wouldn't have so many people ting on you.

If you know the answer, Blake, then you answer his question. Because I have no earthly idea why Woo does anything.
As for the debate?
Been there, done that.
It's over.
But if you misunderstood, then go back and reread all the posts.
I did.
Been there, did that.
Don't need to do it again a third time.
But be my guest if you want to, I'm not stopping you.

[xmas1997]

This dude is trying so hard to play dumb right now. There is no way he has seriously debated anybody. It's amazing to see the lengths that he will go to avoid answering a direct question.

No, I did not try to go against authority when I posted my definition of atheism. Why did you ask me if I was trying? What did you see in my posts that gave you that impression?

Well, then, good for you, Woo.
I knew you could answer that for yourself.
So what else is new?

[SA210]

you're not the mad one. It's everyone else that's mad.

I predict you'll do something mad. Go.

Hi angry troll. I see you are still not loving yourself. Why do you hate yourself so?

[Blake]

If you know the answer, Blake, then you answer his question. Because I have no earthly idea why Woo does anything.
As for the debate?
Been there, done that.
It's over.
But if you misunderstood, then go back and reread all the posts.
I did.
Been there, did that.
Don't need to do it again a third time.
But be my guest if you want to, I'm not stopping you.

I've read enough here to know through that wordy gibberish, you haven't answered anything. You prefer to talk and whine about people instead of discussing the topic.

The great thing about this place is that all you have to do to be victorious is declare yourself the winner.