The way I read it, he didn't say George was the 3rd best player in the NBA because of that game, but rather that game was a demonstration of why he is the 3rd best player in the game.
Oh, nobody is going to do that, I am just saying that the game shouldn't sway voters one way or another in a vacuum. Any reasonable voters shouldn't look at a mid November game against one of the worst/most under-performing team in the league and say he is making a strong case for MVP.
Whether that is actually the case is something else, and I yes, I agree that MVP voting has become an issue, though DPoY, CoY, and defensive teams are bigger problems.
The way I read it, he didn't say George was the 3rd best player in the NBA because of that game, but rather that game was a demonstration of why he is the 3rd best player in the game.
Absolutely. It was just like he came to a conclusion ...for example someone one here mentioned (pre-season) PG was already a superstar (it was a Laker fan) ...I said, No. Not yet. That kind of game even vs. the knicks could open some folks eyes ...that was ll I am saying. And MVP campaigns are built over signature moments I thought it was one ...
paul george candidacy for mvp....has more credibility that that fake ass hero 2 seasons in a row by parker...coat riders have no business being mention in any award....
Its close, but Lebron is ahead.
Per 36...
I would also add Kevin Love (25,4/13,3/4,8) and Anthony Davis (21,3/11/4,1Blocks/1,9Steals).
What about Cousins! (26/12/1,6 Blocks/2,2 Steals)
Is Kevin Durant really number 2?...because Paul George overall appears to be the better player.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)