LMAO dude i ing remember laughing at that ! Wasn't that picked up like a few weeks before? Does that still have a job in the league?
this pitiful dude is also to thank for the onside kick. the ball straight bounced right off his chest
![]()
LMAO dude i ing remember laughing at that ! Wasn't that picked up like a few weeks before? Does that still have a job in the league?
Reality....
bounced right off chest and boom ...
look on his face says more than just losing the ball .... "damnit I'm gonna be fired again! Kendra gone be mad!".
and sure enough she cried her way home ...
![]()
Last edited by BRHornet45; 11-25-2013 at 02:47 AM.
Can't blame Hank though, tbh. No prep for . ing Kendra, goddamn ho went from gobbling old white balls to loser half-nig balls. Hanks a mulatto right? ing doesn't matter, is light skinned enough. hahha
that drop was embarrassing. He could've easily changed the momentum of the game. Pierre Garcon also dropped a surefire TD. people will always remember that Manning pick 6, even though Wayne ran a ty route for some reason. still, getting a Jim Caldwell coached team to the SB was an accomplishment in itself.
second half adjustments won the game. Saints outscored Colts 25-7 in the second half.
Like I said, momentum. Payton ing ass-prison raped that dumb Colt's coach. Don't even remember his name. Just remember he always looked ing clueless. lol
I just don't see Denver with any real shot at winning. They have to secure the 1 seed to avoid playing in cold windy places like KC or Foxborough, hope their own home field doesn't have bad weather, and even if they get to the Super Bowl, it's in New Jersey so he has another cold windy game against probably a pretty stout defense.
Life will be a lot easier on Brees without Browner and Thurmond, so it may be closer than that in the end tbh...
We'll likely have to call a guy up from the practice squad for this one.
If you guys lose ima be in pissed.
you know, considering we gave you guys that W in Charlotte lol
Gave us that win? I recall Russell TAKING it from you. Russ to Kearse.And hey, players make plays. A forced fumble isn't being given anything. Even if you didn't fumble, there was no guarantee you were getting in the end zone, even if you were between 5-10 yards out.
In a game like this, anything can happen. The Saints are a high level opponent who primarily passes the ball, against a defense missing the bulk of their cornerback depth. This game is as important to us, as it is to you tbh. We want that tie breaker for home field, as I'm sure you would like them to get their comeuppance and spiral out of control so the Panthers can take the division lead.
I'll give you that about the fumble, but I'm about 90% sure we would have taken that in. Besides, this is a different team then it was in week one. Looking forward the rematch in the playoffs.
One game at a time. We have a tough end to our schedule.
But, the past two years we've played close, both at your place I might add. Carolina hasn't had to make the trip up North yet.
just like they pushed Brees down the field against the Niners.
Anyone picking Denver as the favorite is delusional.... it's going to be cold throughout the entire playoffs, and Peyton is 1-6 in cold weather since 2003.... in games below 40 degrees, Peyton has thrown 22 interceptions to 24 touchdowns.... Denver is the favorite for another embarrassing one-and-done choke, imho.....
I think the Seahawks win the Super Bowl running away.
Having said that, the Giants have proven with their last two SB wins that if you get hot, then anyone could potentially win it.
I don't really disagree with you....which sucks for me.
But you never know, they can still start clicking again and become unstoppable like they were at the first part of the season. We will see though. I do want to thank you for your team showing up yesterday....that turned out to be huge for us.
I would give NO the nod right now in the NFC. NE/Pittsburgh would be my picks (1a.1b.) for the AFC
lol the Seahawks winning on a neutral field
lol thinking Denver has a chance
lol at still using a false premise of a "neutral field" as an excuse. This is as open as all --there will be 2 new contestants in New Jersey this year who'll it be is still to be determined.
False premise? Seahawks were 3-5 last year on the road (only 1 win vs. a team with a winning record)
They are 5-1 so far this year with only two of those vs. winning teams
But, lets look at the entirety of their schedule this year... They have beaten a grand total of 3 winning teams all season![]()
![]()
![]()
Here are the teams Seattle has beaten:
Panthers(r)
Niners
Jags
Texans
ans
Cards(r)
Rams
Bucs
Falcons
Vikes
That is ing impressive!
We still don't know much about this squad, tbh, other than that under Wilson, the Seahawks are a combined 8-6 on the road in the last two years with only 3 of those victories against winning teams. It's obvious that they play much, much better at home than on the road. A Super Bowl is not a home game, and they wouldn't benefit from fake noise and 25+ yards in procedure, delay, and false-start penalties like they always do in Seattle.
I'll take a team with a proven, super-bowl winning QB (Saints) over a game manager with a 1-1 record in the playoffs (lost on the road) any day. And, if Green Bay gets ARod back and slips into the playoffs, I would take them over the Seahawks too.
Don't know who's going to win, but it won't be Denver. Their defense is appalling.
I thought that had to be wrong, i figured their defense had to be at least mediocre, but so far their Defense is ranked no. 26 while their offense is obviously ranked 1.That sounds just like some of those colts' teams.
Meanwhile patriots D is ranked 9. lol, so even when their fans on their D or they deal with injuries, they still have at least a middle of the road D, if not better. props to Belichick.
So...the Saints have one win against a winning team on the road and one more win against a winning team than the Seahawks do and they're overwhelmingly better than the Seahawks? I'm not sold on that and perhaps the upcoming MNF will go a ways to prove who is the better team. There's a ton of games to go and the 2nd half will definitely show what the Hawks are in comparison to some of the other top teams in the NFC are. I would scoff at the idea that you think the Packers would beat the Hawks with that horrid of a defense that gave up wins to the hapless Cade McNown and tied with Christian Ponder. But, there is too much to play for to really get a read on what's going to happen.
Last edited by The Gemini Method; 11-25-2013 at 05:26 PM.
can you two get a room plz?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)