Reply With Quote
Nets. Lolkers at least had pre-career raping injury Bryant chucking them to victory sometimes and Paussy wasn't completely neutered like he is this season.
2012/13 Lakers
2013/14 Nets
12/13 Lakers
or
13/14 Nets?
Nets. Lolkers at least had pre-career raping injury Bryant chucking them to victory sometimes and Paussy wasn't completely neutered like he is this season.
12/13 Lakers, since they were considered favorites to come out of the West.
12-13 Lakers, for sure.
The LOLakers made the playoffs in the West. Nets are ing horrible.
Either team would hold on to a 5 point lead with 28 seconds left in game 6, NBA Finals.
120 million reasons for my vote.
The Nets have a 120 million dollar roster too. So try again, face.
Nyets.
The Lakers had a serviceable Dwight Howard, Nash was less of a pussy than _eron Williams, Kobe was playing well before The Achilles.
KG looks worse than Duncan (and that's saying a lot), Pierce looks even more of a TOSB than Manu, Brook is hurt, Kidd is way in over his head.
In order for that to be possible, they would have to first make it to game 6 of the finals. Which they didn't/couldn't.
dumbass
On the bright side, at 3-9 the Nets are only a game and a half out of a playoff spot in the leastern conference.
too early to say. nets need time to agglutinate the new pieces and they'll only get better as the season progresses, but speaking of current form I think they're probably worse than the 12-13 lakers, tied with the 13-14 lakers
The Lakers did suck ass last year, but wow holy the Nets suck
s couldn't even make it to Game 5 of the first round.
Too early to tell as there are still games to be played for the nets.
That said, the lakers last year wasn't a horrible team, they were 7th seed in the west with their 12fta advantage. The nets, at this pace, probably won't make 7th seed in a so far disappointing season.
We'll just have to wait this out.
Knicks?
At least the Nets have fat ass Williams out and are currently playing two relics that just dont cut it anymore.
Knicks, in the other hand are just terrible WITH Melo and a so so cast.
They shouldn't be this bad but yet they are. My vote, Knicks.
The Lakers were a bigger disappointment than the Nets could ever be, but the Nets can very easily break down from injuries, implode and toss out a HoF basketball player from his coaching debut.
Tough, both had sky high expectations. Record wise the Nets are worse, but the Lakers IMO were a bigger disappointment. Everything that could go wrong in a season took place. Chemistry issues, injuries, coaching changes (3x).
It's a Spur board, so Lakers by default.
The Nets are much worse so far, but the 2013 Lakers were probably the most disappointing team in NBA history, at least based on expectations, tbh..
I believe NY will bounce back to the playoff range before the all-star break with big daddy TC back. Teams with negative W/L records are among the top 8 in the east, NY ain't left too far behind imho.
Nets have still time to turn it around tbh
Lakers had lots of injuries last year, they stay healthy they beat the Spurs.
Lakers had lots of injuries, lost many of their top players for long stretches of the season. Had the spurs lost their top players for the same amount of games they don't make the playoffs.
The Lakers had no backcourt in the playoffs with the injuries, had the spurs lost their backcourt they also get swept.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
