Battle of Blair vs Neal
http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400488965
Blair isn't the issue. He sucks. We wouldn't be any better with him because our core is older. Tim is slower. Manu is Manu without the skills he used to have. Diaw. Splitter. Everyone except Leonard is suffering a decline induced by age, even Parker.
Neal was a turnover, no move, heat check chucker with no D. So what?
Nah he's a 0-timer.
I still do not think anyone is aloooot worse than Neal the way you said it, atleast I hope not.
I'd say pot meet kettle but wait, who the are you again? Nevermind, it's not important.
Last edited by Hoops Czar; 11-09-2013 at 11:17 PM.
Wolters is the starting PG and the backup Ridnour is injured. That's why Neal is being pressed into action at the backup PG position.
well he does not stay in front of anybody, in fact, he gets straight up dribbled without any effort from anybody.. just to name two emblematic moments, both game clinching defenses were terrible despite being in our favor, let me brake it down:
- the first one, he is contesting a shot from behind the player shooting a 3, so anything he can achive, is fouling the player, instead leaves the player a free shot (granted it's unbalanced, but still free) with no rpessure
- the second one, against iggy is downright pathetic, one on one situation against one of the worst shooters in the league, anybody knows he is going to the rim, yet belinelli manages to not only not hold him off with his body, but he doesn't even stay in front of him, leaving him a clean path to the rim where timmy actually contest the shot.
and tbh, if you look closely to his halfcourt D, you can see that he never actually guards anybody off the ball, takes half an hour to recover from a screen and so on.. neal was only terrible at recovering from help D, he was never being picked up like belinelli is tbh..
It's way to early to compare Marco to Gary unless you go back to Gary's first
season with the Spurs. Everyone here knows that the longer Marco plays here
the more he will fit in. This was the same with Gary. I think that Marco is more
athletic than Gary will become a good addition to the Spurs. It's way too early to
compare the two, come back at the end of the season.
fk this clown tbh
marco >>>> hero
Bonner is our only player left on the roster besides the Big Three which were present on the 2007 championship team.
I will give it time till I make a full judgement on this here, hope you are wrong.
Hope you don't seriously believe this.
I'll say this, my heart and nerves are EXTREMELY grateful that matador defense playing, chucking, ball-movement killing mother er is no longer a Spur. Let him get his garbage-time stats in Milwaukee. We know better.
11 pts(4-12 FG), 0 rebs, 3 assist, 5 turnovers, 4 fouls in 26 minutes. -29 vs Indiana
Don't try so hard guys..there'll always be a place fer white dudes in the NBA.... Relax
Bump.
10 pts(4-11 FG), reb, assist, -11 in 20 minutes vs Bobcats.
Neal average 12 pts on 39% FG in the season.
he's shooting like 43% from three. i think beli is shooting like 53% from 3
+1
Word.....................
Marco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hero.
See, this thread only gets bumped when Neal has a lousy game. I guess nobody bothered to bump this thread when he went for 18 points on 6-11 shooting, 4 assists and just 1 turnover against the Heat or his 23 points on 8-15 shooting 4/1 A/TO ratio vs the Cavs. If you're going to start scrap booking Neal's bad games, then you should start one up for Belinelli too. Belinelli's stats would be nearly identical to Neal's if he were playing for the Bucks. But carry on.
He's shooting 39% on the season, bro. Sounds like those bad games are frequent, tbh!
The Bucks suck. They have very few guys that can penetrate off the dribble, just about all shots taken are from outside the paint, and he certainly isn't getting the kind of open looks like he was getting in San Antonio because the Bucks don't move the ball around like the Spurs. It's not all that shocking that his field goal percentage has taken a dive.
Hoops, bottomline, Marco is a better fit for the Spurs. Neal was a good role player when he was here but Marco is a better role player. Why? Because of his bbiq, his passing, his court vision, his defense in relation to Neal's nonexistent defense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
