Reply With Quote
Kobe: 5
Daddy: 4
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
Record between the Shaq and Gasol era. Now can't win a single game without a dominant frontline. SMH.
Kobe: 5
Daddy: 4
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
I do believe MJ likes the rockets tbh. that's why he retired and let them win a couple.
You can have that, but I'm stickin' with 0-3...
Kobe: 5
the tired old bag Duncan: 4
Out of curiosity Cubster, since Duncan returned to All-NBA status and is once again rounding into form (2 assists shy of a triple double last night tbh) while the Spurs have one of the top 4 records in the league, when he is no longer going to be considered the TOSB when it is clearly Achilles-torn Kobe who is now the TOSB? Or are you just going to stay in the past?
Surely you can admit Kobe is TOSB status now?
When the Lakers have 6 in the cabinet and Kobe makes them take 1 out and have to give it back then he'll be TOSB.
Duncan must wear that shame, his shame. He could not make a layup over a shrimp. Then couldn't make a tap in of the miss over the same shrimp. Don't fret though,,,it not like he' been made to pay for it (cept here). It's like it never happened. James got his back-to-back, Media got what they wanted and it was (hands off Duncan and the Spurs).
Kolby can't even make it back to get a chance at 6, tee hee.
Ipso facto::uncan is the tired old bag.
I ain't Media. I ain't lettin' you offin' the hook.
Well yeah he definitely choked but it has nothing to do with being a TOSB. imo mental state was damaged after Manu/Pop robbed him after game 6
Of course it does. Had he not been a TOSB he would have made either the layup, or the tap in. He didn't. Duncan is resisdent TOSB now, Lee. And it fits him. He's got that hang dog look, it's like natural. But, now there is a good reason for it.
^ fine you can have that...I've got
Tired old = TOSF
As it should be.
He averaged 27 and 14 in the last two games of the Finals, on the road. Parker went 3-13 and Manu was doing his best Earnest Byner impressions. But you don't talk about that, do you?
I know you love distilling things down to singular moments for whatever reason (this is you being manipulated by media, who thrives on presenting "moments" removed from context). But the game wasn't lost on that missed Duncan layup.
And you know that. But to admit otherwise would deprive you of ammunition when we get in Kobe's ass.
Of course I enjoy those moments. I was raised on those moments, tortured by them. Then all the sudden the worm turned, I got straightened out ('85) and then "you" and Media didn't want to do the MOMENTS anymore. Uh, uh. We doin' the MOMENTS.
Salty ass
0-3
When has Media never wanted to do "moments?"
ESPN built a billion dollar empire on "moments."
Media crucified Buckner, when it was Schilraldi who should've been hanging. Etc, etc. You know the drill.
They won't do Webber turning his back on Horry.
ESPN built a billion dollar empire on "moments."
Media crucified Buckner, when it was Schilraldi who should've been hanging. Etc, etc. You know the drill.
They won't do Wallace turning his back on Horry.
They won't do Duncan missing that layup.
They won't do Barkley ing up on Pippen leaing to the Paxson 3. The video is right there. It's never been cited. And never will.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
