This. I'd be shocked if a league that couldn't get 12 to agree to $50 will get 12 to agree to $100 one year later.
you people for trying to shave points off PPR. I hope you all die slow, fiery deaths.
This. I'd be shocked if a league that couldn't get 12 to agree to $50 will get 12 to agree to $100 one year later.
fractional points should be added for sure. way less chance of a tie. also keeping the PPR at 1 point allows for a lot more options when drafting. Everyone benefits from the point the same but it also allows the ty ass RB choices to be that much better. I think that is always a good thing. 3rd payout as points leader sounds like a good idea.
I care more about adding fractional points tbh. I just won the league at 1.0 PPR so if yall want to keep it at that fine
And yeah regular season points leader should at least get his money back as a payout.
Sooo after getting to the airport too early and having nothing to do here's what needs to be voted on once we get 12:
1) Since we agree there should be PPR to some extent, there's no need to vote on that, we can just skip to whether or not it's 0.5 or 1.0 PPR.
2) Whether or not there should be fractional points
We should have two stages of voting for bonus/penalty points, the first stage for whether or not there should be bonus/penalty points for each of those things, and then a 2nd stage for what the points should be for all things where we voted yes. I agree with J.T. that 300+ yard passing games and 100+ rushing/receiving games are far too frequent and don't merit bonus points but we should still vote on it. Same with Harlem on QBs who throw 3+ INTs, that's a good idea.
To kind of piggy back on Harlem's idea on QB INT's....we made each INT -2 points this year. Seemed to work well, no complaints from anyone.
And@ me making suggestions as a bystander at this point.
Picks are -3 in my league. Don't do fractional pts for passing or returning yds. 1 pt/20 yds passing seems to work well, 1 pt/10 yds returning. Make lost fumbles worth -2 or -3. FF's (regardless of recovery) should be +1-2 pts imo.
Sounds like we may have a legit shot at the $400 league too...almost halfway there.
Yup yall s are gonna pay off my car for me. If I don't pay it off myself beforehand, which I probably will, which means...Vegas trip.
i'm not in the league, though i'm first on the wait-list
![]()
my input anyway, in my experience, especially in recent years, qb's put up monster points anyway. 25 passing yards per point, 6 for td's, -3 for INT's. i've also seen 4 for passing td's with -2 for INT's. either way, having 2 int's negate a TD seems to make sense. a 1 TD 2 INT game should not be a net positive imo
NO ING WAY TO 4-PT TDs...that is the most sexual scoring in FF, and will not allow it in any league I'm a part of. Not happening. A touchdown is worth 6 any way you slice it.
This. No ing way are we doing 4 point passing touchdowns.
I agree w/ Spurraider on 6/3 TD/INT, 2 INTs should cancel out a touchdown.
Agree on 2 INT equal to 1 TD in scoring. I'm in on making the 6 point pass TD an untouchable stat.
Also, for those who participated this year, how was your experience with LeagueSafe? For the winners, did they disperse your payment quickly enough? Just wondering, if we all had good experiences with them I'm definitely open to using them for future leagues. Seems like the easiest way for strangers to play in a money league.
They already deposited the money in my bank account. Jewing a $5.00 fee was pretty lame but I'd have a hard time believing there's a 3rd party service like that that doesn't charge a withdrawal fee. The fee is well worth it so no one can complain there's internet gotry going on.
The site did have a random message saying it can only disperse to US banks, so that's probably what happened with Harlem's payment. We can plan around that next year with paypal as the intermediary.
The league is mine next year. No way the Cowboys defense will me TWO years in a row. No way.
- Jerry Jones, 1999
Every time a starting black QB on your team wins their game=3 points
This is an impossible function to add into any of the scoring metrics provided by ESPN.com, Yahoo.com, or NFL.com. If this proposal receives a majority approval it will have to be done with a concurrent proposal to load all stat tracking and league scoring off-site with all numbers being crunched by hand.
-3 points when a black QB gets injured via monkeyball
This has been noted and filed under your proposal to load scoring off-site in order to add custom metrics.
In on the hundred league, no way on the 400
I vote for a return of the IDP
Leaguesafe is cool
6/3 TD/INT change
on taking away the bonus for RB's
fumbles should result in lost point(s)
Id like to take this chance to reiterate my intentions to stay in the league at the higher $100 dollar rate.
I vote yes to 1.0 PPR. anything less overly marginalizes runningbacks.
I vote Yes to fractional points because ties shouldnt be allowed in fantasy football for money, and all means should be taken to avoid them. Also, football is a game of inches and each yard counts.
6/3 TD/INT is a little high. I vote yes on the condition of keeping 300 yard bonus.
Keep the 100 yard RB bonus. Random RBs get hot every year and this helps keep them as relevant as possible. If you're really worried about too many bonuses being handed out, just lower the bonus point amount for 100/300 rushing/passing and keep the tiered system.
There should be negative points for fumbles if there are negative points for ints. As well as blocked kicks/punts/safeties
Im undecided but leaning toward yes about the $400 league. I would need the rules before deciding.
Idk why anyone would vote against fractional points.
44 yards should count for more than 40 yards.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)