Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 39 of 39
  1. #26
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    My Idea

    Cut the lottery from 14 to 8 teams

    Those 8 teams are entered into the lottery

    After the order is determined, the other 6 picks will be up for grabs in another drawing amongst those 8 teams. For example; Milwaukee could land the 2nd and 10 pick, or Utah the 3rd and 9th pick.

    The very worst teams could get two top prospects in the same draft. The two team teams that didn't get 2nd lottery picks would have greater chance to win the lottery by adding more ping pong balls in their favor. The other 6 teams (depending if they are still that bad and how good their picks were) would have a predetermined amount of ping pong balls deducted.

    For example; If Charlotte & Orlando only received the #4 & 5 picks and not any of the picks in the #9-14 range. They would have a higher chance to win the following drafts lottery by giving them more ping pong balls.
    You're just encouraging MORE tanking if a team in the bottom 8 can get TWO lottery picks. Also, what happens to the teams that SHOULD be picking 9-14? Are their picks just bumped back? And everyone else's are bumped back, too? Thanks for pushing the Spurs back into the 30s for their first rounder.

  2. #27
    Veteran r0drig0lac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    14,624
    the only real solution is that all the teams that did not make the playoffs and all teams eliminated in the first round of the playoffs attend the lottery,% with very close as well be the last league or be eliminated in the first round have almost the same chance of catching a lottery, and therefore teams will fight to make the playoffs. And before you say that increasing the difference between the teams, the league today functions to only have 2 or maybe 3 teams with a real chance, so the only real change is that teams need to play not to lose in order to participate in the lottery

  3. #28
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    I think they just need to change the lottery back to the way it was. The worst team has 14 chances, and the last lottery team has one. It's SO heavily weighted towards the worst teams now that they are encouraging tanking.

    Just put it back the way it was.
    Last edited by exstatic; 12-30-2013 at 12:07 PM.

  4. #29
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    You're just encouraging MORE tanking if a team in the bottom 8 can get TWO lottery picks. Also, what happens to the teams that SHOULD be picking 9-14? Are their picks just bumped back? And everyone else's are bumped back, too? Thanks for pushing the Spurs back into the 30s for their first rounder.
    the top 6 teams in the league would end up picking 30-36th. I over looked that part. Those 6 teams could be give a second second round pick within the top 42 going from the team with the

    Current Top 6 teams in the league

    Pacers
    Oklahoma City
    Spurs
    Portland
    Miami
    Clippers

    For example

    31. Clippers
    32. Miami
    33. Portland
    34. San Antonio
    35. Oklahoma City
    36. Indiana
    37. Indiana
    38.Oklahoma City
    39. San Antonio
    40. Portland
    41. Miami
    42. Clippers

    This is actually, fairly, similar to another proposed draft change that was floated around a couple of seasons ago (Where every team in the lottery received 2 first round picks and the other half draft picked in the 2nd round).

    While the top teams wouldn't be able to pick the 30 best available players. They would be able to get 2 prospects on favorable contracts. Less impactful players, generally, but teams could be willing to take bigger risks with multiple picks (particular teams that have top records for several seasons)

    The only proposal that actually would eliminate tanking is the "draft chart". As long as there is a lottery, teams will tank. Limiting the lottery to 8 teams, in theory, could limit the amount of teams that attempt to lose game.

    Teams that normally finish just outside of the playoffs would be forced to be more active in the off-season. Instead of making minimal changes and playing out the following season and seeing how they fair. If they fall out of contention for a playoff spot, then they usually start playing younger players in hopes of improving the draft standing.

    The idea that the 8 worst teams can get 2 picks inside the top 14, Is a good one. Not fool proof but a good one.
    Last edited by cd021; 01-01-2014 at 02:34 AM.

  5. #30
    Peace! bluebellmaniac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,853
    The integrity of the game is at stake, you gotta eliminate tanking. I vote for the draft wheel.

  6. #31
    Since 1979 Das Texan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Post Count
    5,340
    The product of the NBA in general already sucks, what they really need to do is make the NBADL a true minor league system with each team having their own affiliate and having 5-8 players on those teams under their control.

  7. #32
    No Spurs No DrunkTXLabrat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    1,867
    i hate tanking. but i don't like the idea of set draft position. i think the best fix is every team gets lottery balls. champs get one, runner up 2, champs conference runner up 3, runner up conf. runner up 4, etc. that's about as fair as it can get.

  8. #33
    Peace! bluebellmaniac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,853
    i hate tanking. but i don't like the idea of set draft position. i think the best fix is every team gets lottery balls. champs get one, runner up 2, champs conference runner up 3, runner up conf. runner up 4, etc. that's about as fair as it can get.
    But that is why teams tank... Kirby pls....
    Last edited by bluebellmaniac; 01-02-2014 at 04:19 AM.

  9. #34
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,325
    But that is why teams tank... Kirby pls....
    lol

  10. #35
    Believe. timmy2003's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    610
    But that is why teams tank... Kirby pls....
    Exactly. Teams at the bottom simply don't have much motivation.

  11. #36
    No Spurs No DrunkTXLabrat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    1,867
    kirby pls?

  12. #37
    No Spurs No DrunkTXLabrat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    1,867
    set draft order would suck. dismiss and joke all you want. no my idea isn't as good at completely disincentivizing as set draft order. it's better, cause it doesn't scorch the earth like set orders would.

    sucky teams need to draft higher. they just need the kick in the butt of a bigger chance of bad luck.

  13. #38
    Peace! bluebellmaniac's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,853

  14. #39
    No Spurs No DrunkTXLabrat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    1,867
    thanks blue. set draft order would blow. it's a fix for tanking, but it's a break for drafting. bad team + bad pick = such a bad team, might as well let em tank.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •