Reply With Quote
Wrong forum broski, but sick TV. I'm sure Cedric already pre-ordered his.
Last January at CES Samsung promised to deliver a 110-inch Ultra HDTV this year. Well the year is up and holding true to its promise, Samsung has delivered. Apparently the beast of a TV will be launched first in China, the Middle East and a handful of European countries, with a price tag of $142,000.
Measuring in at a whopping 2.6-meters by 1.8-meters, it is bigger than a king-size bed. I don’t think I even have a wall big enough for it to fit on in my house. But then little average me isn’t the target market. It’s more likely that the TV will appeal to VIPs and anyone else with a rather large wage packet.
It is available for custom orders, that is just before Samsung launch the new generation of Ultra HD TVs, which will include a 105-inch curved model.
It’s worth mentioning that the $142,000 price is only for the basic edition!
Wrong forum broski, but sick TV. I'm sure Cedric already pre-ordered his.
Dude can't even afford real Viagra.
Not being able to afford the brand name ED drugs is just another part of the intricate lie. Of course he can afford it.. he has a 125K car, and a home valued at almost a half million USD for god sakes.
Asians making up for their poor penis size by making big phones and big TV's
I have a 13 incher..So stfu
You're not Asian ?
Not talking about the suction cup dildo installed on your shower wall.
wait a sec, how do you know about that device?
he is the device
hey mouse
seems like the big producers have move away from sammys amlod technology...for mainstream ...too expensive apparently...
The tax on this
picklebreaths really talented in making TV sets and computer monitors imho. guess pickles can dramatically improve one's knowledge in optical technology
It's called a tablet
Solid investment tbh.
Is this 4K UHD or 8K UHD?
4320p? Gonna be about 10 years before we see that.
I have a 14 incher, ing noob.
13 incher? which's it, your arm or leg?
Would be sick in a sports bar. Night Clubs too, as it will be much better than projector screens, and multiple TV screens side by side.
Lol, there is seriously a troll account for every ing scenario.
Should not be priced at $150,000 if it's not 8K UHD tbh.
Calm down people.
8k is a theoretical standard that only exist in a few prototypes.
As it stands we don't even have the technology of transporting uncompressed 4k feeds over distances of more than a few meters or to process/switch them in any practical way.
And finally I love how people are buying <50" 4k UHD TV, because unless you are watching them from a distance of a few centimetres your eyes cannot tell the difference between 2k and 4k.
4k or 5k are great digital production formats intended for high end film/video production and post production. While broadcasters are mildly interested in the future possibility of using the 4k format for broadcasting, it is the TV manufacturers (most specifically Sony) who are using it as a marketing tool to sell useless expensive sets to people who don't know what they are buying.
It's like the famous pixel count war in still digital cameras, just because it has more pixel on an otherwise ty sensor, people expect the pictures to be better - and the manufacturers gladly support those opinions.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
