Reply With Quote
I'd rather they package De Colo in a deal with someone else to get a backup 3 but if no one bites, swapping De Colo for Neal is a win.
I suppose. Neal is better than throwing in Joseph and De Colo.
I just don't want to have to deal with his really awful defense again. It won't surprise me if the Spurs trade for him since it looked like they still wanted him back, but they don't need another SG.
I'd rather they package De Colo in a deal with someone else to get a backup 3 but if no one bites, swapping De Colo for Neal is a win.
DONE, I would take it..
This is a weird ing situation. He calls out Sanders, and they immediately want him out?
Odd but I'm sure with how the Bucks suck, Neal probably wants out of there more than anything
Whether Sanders really has been dogging it or not, he's much more valuable as a building block to the Bucks going forward than Gary Neal.
Obviously they felt so, anyways, because they did not seem to take too kindly to Neal's pep talk.
Or Sanders demanded Neal be moved. Could be a bad thing if they cater to his request.
That said, no to Neal. There were plenty of scenarios in which having Neal would make sense, but none of those are reality.
True, but I still think giving that much locker room power to an unproven commodity like Sanders sends a bad message
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
