Reply With Quote
The AFC doesn't have the defensive prowess we see in the NFC.
Pretty much guaranteed a superbowl winner now
The AFC doesn't have the defensive prowess we see in the NFC.
^But they have the white QB
Didn't a great white QB just lose to Russell Wilson? Didn't the great Aaron Rodgers get punked by Kaerpernick.....three times in a row?
And how did that work out for Krap last year?
With less than one season under his belt he ended up in the SB and if not for a terrible non call wins it.
correct he lost the superbowl
Yep, four yards away watching a defender holding his receiver.
loser
translation
Yeah the whole world saw that how that wasn't called is a mystery to me. . it's even on youtude, how that was missed..?
no translation losers are losers and 100 years from now all anyone's going to remember is that he lost so, loser
90 years ago or so Harold Abrahams won the Olympic 100m, but his main rival Eric Liddell didn't run because he couldn't compete on a Sunday. They even made a movie out of it, many thinking Liddell would have won.
About 80 years ago the great Eulace Pea was injured and couldn't run in the Olympics so......
Wrong as usual.
except in your ty case the person on record didn't compete and therefore didn't lose you dumb . Krap is on record as a loser
ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMM.....right over your head...again.
Nobody should be this ing stupid, wow~~~~~~~~~~~
Usain Bolt lost to Justin Gatlin this season after a week where he was nursing an injury, now tell me moron do you really think anyone considrerd the great Usian Bolt a loser? There are cir stanced involverd ya ing idiot.
took you long enough to realize you had literally no response. Waiting for me to go to sleep i guess
I'll go slow....
There are cir stances involved dummy, we all know that.
How many tournaments does Tiger Woods win a year? Nowhere close to all those he enters, so he's a loser...right?
your case the party in question is not a do ented loser. In my case we have a do ented loser. The two cases are not related. So when i say he's a loser i'm dead on, he'll always be the qb that ended the 9ers perfect superbowl record.
I knew you weren't getting it, yep...you weren't.
I was showing you that yes time won't matter that's why I mentioned 90 and 80....ok? Dude, you gotta be about the dumbest cat on this site, it's like trying to talk to some kid who don't know .
Kaep will always be known as that cat who was just tossed in there and preceded to take us to a SB and if not for a ty non call wins it.
200+ years ago we won the revolutionary war, 2000 years ago Jesus dies, i can go back further, and just throw out events that have nothing to do with the topic like you did. context matters and your situation is nothing like the one i originally presented. You're just throwing at the wall.
Why didn't the great baseballer Josh Gibson play in the major leagues? Well let's see could it be because blacks weren't allowed? You see little guy we do pay attention to the situation and not just the results, which was a point that you couldn't comprehend.
how many world series did he lose? Yep ZERO so he's not a loser like Krap
There are 32 teams, right? So 30 of them all had QB's that were far worst losers than he was...right? since 30 NFL QB's didn't eve make it. I know...ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
but only one goes down in history as the superbowl loser. In this case it's the extra historical fact as the qb that ended the 9ers perfect run at the lambo trophy
So 100 years from now the only NFL QB's anyone will know about are Joe Flacco and Colin Kaerpernick, thats losing? Ask somebody,,,"so who was the QB for the Rams" it would be........"How should I know".
losers can be reknowned and still losers. The confederates, the nazis, the brits.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
