Something to improve green sustainability is a good idea. However, anything like the Kyoto Protocol is a fools errand. As for replacing fossil fuels, it will be a natural process that doesn't need to be forced.
Not that I don't trust your ing genius, a dude like you who posts 38000 times here must an eminent scientist who understood everything but if you are wrong and indeed it is urgent we do something ? Like for instance we need to force the process...
so what then ? Enlighten me
why are you bringing political parties into this, tbh? 50 years ago scientists thought we were undergoing global cooling, were heading to an ice age, and actually pitched the idea of MELTING the polar ice caps to fight it. we didn't take rash actions with the thought process of "what if the skeptics are wrong"
Brazil getting owned per par
He calls it alternative design. Maybe it's mice that rule the universe.Mouse is not a creationistnot sure what he is either
So what raider ? What's your point again? Do you tell me fighting against c02 concentration could be a bad thing ? So it's better to do nothing ? Until when we gonna do like that ?
You're going to have to do more than blow him if you are going to sell that weak in here.
Somebody needs to explain to me what's alternative design tbh ? Aliens ?
stop putting words in my mouth. i said i was in favor of becoming smarter about our environmental efforts.
It didn't redo the quote in your original post so I will manually enter it and then right below it post the quote I have in mind. I will even bold key words to help you out.
Its damn obvious that you are comparing the ocean to a fizzing soda. As these posts happened in sequence.
Fighting against increased CO2 is not a bad thing, until it is advocated that we spend large amounts of money doing so.
Why not fight the fights that are more easily won, like reducing or stopping aerosol emissions?
My God.
When will your stupidity stop?
Is the ocean under pressure... do you have some magical cap on it to cause a sudden, drastic, change in pressure?
A soda can go flat without fizzing. Did you know that? If you change the temperature slowly, without containing it's release of CO2 pressure, you will not know it went flat until you tasted it.
I was not comparing a fizzing soda to the ocean like you imply. I was pointing out in a manner that people with no scientific understanding can comprehend. That a cold soda can just has a mild "pop" when you open it, and a warm soda can will fizz. This is because the fluid is capable of holding more CO2 when cold than when warm. I'm sorry that you cannot comprehend that temperature makes a difference in how much CO2 the water will hold. It's not my fault you are so ing stupid. The only way this relates to the ocean is helping people to understand that temperature changes the amount of CO2 the ocean will hold.
You are the owner of stupidity. Your attempt to call me stupid because of your lack of understanding, then because it doesn't fit in your simply world, and calling others stupid...
Think of evolution with the help of a higher power. We manipulate genetics already. The thought is that who ever God, or the gods are, manipulated genetics rather than it being purely accidental.
How much time separates these posts?
A) 1 week
B) 4 weeks
C) 3 months
D) 1 year
E) 3 years
Is this an annual ritual for you?
From January 2013:
Then once again, you are an idiot. My example of a soda going flat was for people who don't understand solubility of gasses in fluids. Almost everyone realizes soda holds less CO2 when warm than when cold. For you to think I literally meant the ocean acts like soda, to the degree soda responds... is so laughable.
those are your words, not mine. Deal with it. Youre the one that felt the need to dumb it down.
would you rather we talk about capacitors, flywheels, PDEs, linearity, consant what ifs, wishful thinking, heat exchange, flaglots, racism, solar burps, when and when not to use a graph, napkin math, warming drives CO2, or any of the other stupid you have said, partschanger?
Last edited by FuzzyLumpkins; 01-27-2014 at 01:21 AM.
Which means absolutely nothing.
it means plenty in the context of the post i was responding to
Oh and another thing dumbass, you put that solubility chart up immediately after the soda as ocean stupidity. We were talking about solubility, nitwit.
global warming? fck it who cares, the sooner the human species get burn to death is the best thing to happen to this planet
another week of 40 degrees down here...lmao
What if climate change has gotten so bad where it's basically pointless to do anything about it? What if it's like a black hole and we just saw the event horizon? I'm not an expert on physics or any science but I always thought that once you see the event horizon, it's game over. Maybe, we're just ed.
I don't see where am I putting words in your mouth, I'm just asking. at the end I'm questionning pace to solve issues. becoming smarter won't do it imo
Yes, I was explaining solubility. Again, the example with soda was a teaching aid that everyone can relate to. That CO2 solubility changes with temperature.
Why can't you get that simple truth through your head?
So...
What is the answer to post #90?
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 01-27-2014 at 01:02 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote