thunderup going in raw
Have you sought the scientific reason as to why you're such a got? Brain chemistry I bet.
thunderup going in raw
Nope. Scientific theory is not a guess, it is backed up by evidence and tests. Gravity is a theory too, you really gonna jump off a building and think you're gonna fly because it's only a "theory?"go look up the cosmic microwave background and the viewing of light from billions of light years away, there's a lot more evidence of the big bang then for god, which is none
Who here has observed evolution? tbh
Who here has observed god? tbh
guess he don't exist![]()
okay then, point being both take faith to believe in
look i can post random links that people think somehow prove a point
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...igion-culture/
http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines...of-eden-found/
See that sculpture, which seems more logical, that it created itself from a pile of rocks or that it was created by a sculptor?
Trolling![]()
really hope bill brings up something about zeitgeist of egyptian times since Jesus was just brought up. Roast him bill plz![]()
did you even read that Nat Geo link?
And lol at the weekly world news. I know you're trying to prove a point but c'mon bro at least find a legit news site
actual funny post from a butthurt christian tbh
tbh it'd be from a solid piece of whatever it's chiseled from not a pile of rocksgood trolling though
Atoms did not exist at that point.
And no scientist with an ounce of sense is going to explain conditions BEFORE the Big Bang. Because we don't know.And therein lies the crux of the matter. In science you are allowed to say we have no idea, or based on observable phenomena we think this is the way it works. Test, test again and look for more evidence. If we ever find hominid fossils the same age as dinosaur fossils science has some explaining to do. Ideas can be refuted based on good evidence reviewed thoroughly.
People like you just make up. So how did insects arise? were they created specially on their own? Poof and God made them? In science that explanation is called supernatural I give up, so I will make something up.
Damn, we should just give up trying to solve some of the mysteries of cancer, since you could come and perform a healing dance around the patients bed...
You don't understand what science can and cannot do. End of story. So because science cannot explain the grand variety of the living world for you, give us your theory please.
Both Ham and Nye are idiots, tbh.
Your entire story above basically is stating nothing other than "it's okay for evolutionists to have no clue on how the world came about, but the idea of god is wrong"
and that "healing dance" claim pretty much summed up your entire argument - stupid and insultive
Further, not knowing how the Big Bang came to occur has absolutely nothing to do with the evolution of living things. Because we can't explain what led to the Big Bang we throw out evolution?
Thats totally ignorant and lacks any kind of common sense.
Tbh I don't really see the point of this debate, viewers supporting either side are not going to be swayed to the opposition
Where did I state the idea of God is wrong smartass? Science can't deal with the supernatural, ie things that cannot be studied using science.
So now you tell me how you think we arrived at the great variety of life we see today since it's clearly not evolution?
What do you have that is better and more predictive?
Give be up the goods, the board awaits your insight.
Believing in a magical invisible sky man and his fairy tales that all contradict each other
No but others looking in can see the difference between two very human endeavors used to explain the universe and the rules it might follow. Add philosophy and people can truly understand our struggle to understand
its all good for me. I would hope people can understand the difference between our methods.
Ken said the bible has the origin of everything but whats the origin of the bible?
The Riverside Church
January 19, 1936
My dear Dr. Einstein,
We have brought up the question: Do scientists pray? in our Sunday school class. It began by asking whether we could believe in both science and religion. We are writing to scientists and other important men, to try and have our own question answered.
We will feel greatly honored if you will answer our question: Do scientists pray, and what do they pray for?
We are in the sixth grade, Miss Ellis's class.
Respectfully yours,
Phyllis
----------------------
January 24, 1936
Dear Phyllis,
I will attempt to reply to your question as simply as I can. Here is my answer:
Scientists believe that every occurrence, including the affairs of human beings, is due to the laws of nature. Therefore a scientist cannot be inclined to believe that the course of events can be influenced by prayer, that is, by a supernaturally manifested wish.
However, we must concede that our actual knowledge of these forces is imperfect, so that in the end the belief in the existence of a final, ultimate spirit rests on a kind of faith. Such belief remains widespread even with the current achievements in science.
But also, everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that some spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is surely quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive.
With cordial greetings,
your A. Einstein
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)